> That last sentence, cast in bronze. "Ours is but to choose
> individually."
>
> Whatever your opinion on the Dean campaign and how they interact with
> us, it's up to individuals to make their choices. This group is an
> informal association, and I don't think we're going to make a
> collective d
Here's where I begin and end on this.
It is in fact the nature of the "beast" and one can choose, as a
"player" to work for
change within it (and risk being consumed by it), or work outside for
it
(and risk being "used", then ultimately sidelined by it) or choose to
sit it
out and navel gaze to
> interested>
>
Stop yer scarin me!
> I would be tempted to tie this back to some of the paradigm issues I hear
> discussed concerning the campaign. To what extent are connections
> centralized? That smacks of a top-down approach as opposed to a bottom up
> approach, particularly in terms of t
