On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, CMR wrote:
>
> > > It seems to me that there's a "third way" for this to work. I think the
> > > media needs to be in some ways both centrally organize/aggregated, but
> > > also distributed in terms of production and actual media hosting.
> > >
> > > In other words, there need
> > It seems to me that there's a "third way" for this to work. I think the
> > media needs to be in some ways both centrally organize/aggregated, but
> > also distributed in terms of production and actual media hosting.
> >
> > In other words, there needs to be a main source for finding Dean medi
> It seems to me that there's a "third way" for this to work. I think the
> media needs to be in some ways both centrally organize/aggregated, but
> also distributed in terms of production and actual media hosting.
>
> In other words, there needs to be a main source for finding Dean media,
> but t
Pardon me if I'm a little late to this discussion.
2. There is significant debate over whether the database for
the media repository should reside in a central location,
or be distributed among DeanSpace sites. I have posted my
arguments for a centralized database in/on [*] the Wiki:
I just wanted to mention my status updates on this list, for
anyone who wasn't at the last IRC meeting.
1. Alison and i have been working hard on the media module.
Our work in progress is running in a sandbox at
http://sf4dean.com/sandbox/. We are getting feedback from
the Dean Media
