Does anyone installed / reviewed or have any kind of impression about Fedora
Linux ?
References:
http://fedora.redhat.com/
http://www.fedora.us/
http://www.linuxelectrons.com/staticpages/index.php?page=20031015191542155
attachment: winmail.dat
Hello,
It's quite weird that the Linux source would not be in the three
"normal" CDs. Source or not, it's a mainstream part of the distro.
I suppose that you can download it from
ftp://194.199.20.114/linux/redhat/9/en/os/i386/SRPMS/kernel-2.4.20-8.src.rpm
(found at rpmfind.net) or grab
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003, Eli Billauer wrote:
Hello,
It's quite weird that the Linux source would not be in the three
normal CDs. Source or not, it's a mainstream part of the distro.
Eli: he was talking about the source to the entire GNU/Linux operating
system with all of its components, not
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003, Eli Billauer wrote about Re: [Haifux] Linux source code:
Hello,
It's quite weird that the Linux source would not be in the three
normal CDs. Source or not, it's a mainstream part of the distro.
Actually, the source of the Linux *kernel* is indeed part of the normal
Exactly, Fetish ! This can be a good reason to tell people when they ask
me next time about kernel compiling.
Thanks!
Eli Billauer wrote:
Hello,
It's quite weird that the Linux source would not be in the three
normal CDs. Source or not, it's a mainstream part of the distro.
I suppose that
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 02:19:21PM +0200, Alon Altman wrote:
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, John Doe wrote:
Hello..
I've encounters a problem while installing he updates cd...
The msg is:
error: Failed dependencies:
/boot/vmlinux-2.4.20-20.9 is needed by
An article was published on 24 hours today, about book crossing in
general, and mentioning the book crossing we had in August Penguin and in
Haifux. Also there is a relation to the intended book crossing on Nov'
26th, during the Technion's day without shopping.
