Hi guys,
I thought the message below might be of interest to some.
Cheers,
Tim B.
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: O'Reilly User Group Newsletter Winter 2015
Date: Thursday 29 January 2015, 19:02:07
From: O'Reilly UK
To: chair...@hants.lug.org.uk
View this email in your bro
On Thu, 2015-01-29 at 16:01 +, Alan Pope wrote:
> Modern Ubuntu (and thus Mint) was unaffected.
Hm, I stand corrected ... and 'find' tends to concur.
G.
--
Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG URL: http://www
On Thu, Jan 29 at 03:36, Gordon Scott wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-01-29 at 15:25 +, David Anderson wrote:
> > Looks like it hasn't affected all distributions. I had updates for
> > Centos and Raspbian, but nothing for Mint
> >
>
> As it's in glibc, that seems to me pretty unlikely.
>
> More likely
On 29 January 2015 at 15:36, Gordon Scott wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-01-29 at 15:25 +, David Anderson wrote:
>> Looks like it hasn't affected all distributions. I had updates for
>> Centos and Raspbian, but nothing for Mint
>>
>
> As it's in glibc, that seems to me pretty unlikely.
>
> More likely
On Thu, 2015-01-29 at 15:25 +, David Anderson wrote:
> Looks like it hasn't affected all distributions. I had updates for
> Centos and Raspbian, but nothing for Mint
>
As it's in glibc, that seems to me pretty unlikely.
More likely is either that Mint was already fixed, or Mint have yet
stil
On Wed, 28 Jan 2015 11:12:11 +
Imran Chaudhry wrote:
> Sounds like a pretty serious one, proof of concept involved an email
> sent to a Exim mail server to get a remote shell.
>
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/01/27/glibc_ghost_vulnerability/
>
Looks like it hasn't affected all distrib
