On 1 April 2011 12:10, bryan hunt wrote:
> OK, there's been a lot of vitriol, let's revisit my original comment.
*sigh* seeing as it's April 1st, and you are a joke, I'll bite...
"vitriol" - no... just people saying you're not very nice... I'd
guess: accompanied lots of quiet shakes of the head;
On 01/04/11 12:10, bryan hunt wrote:
So far I've got a five man clique ganging up on me.
I'm guessing a large part of the responders, and this is a complete shot
in the dark - are employed by such institutions and as such with brook
no criticism.
I also have found Bryan offensive, this is a li
> I personally will be setting my email app to dump any future postings
> from you in the 'trash'.
Fine. Send a letter to Mary Whitehouse while you're at it. I'm going to
do some (real) work now. With kindest regards, Bryan Hunt
--
Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
Web Interface: http
On Fri, 01 Apr 2011 12:10:10 +0100
bryan hunt wrote:
> "Wow. So that's where the tax dollars go. Efficient."
>
> I presume there's several hundred people on this list.
>
> So far I've got a five man clique ganging up on me.
I have kept out of this so far but as a long time member of HantsLUG I
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 12:10:10PM +0100, bryan hunt wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 10:52 +, Andy Smith wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 10:16:33AM +0100, bryan hunt wrote:
> > At this point I personally would just prefer if you buggered off of
> > your own accord.
>
> OK, there's been a lot
> > I'm guessing a large part of the responders, and this is a complete shot
> > in the dark - are employed by such institutions and as such with brook
> > no criticism.
>
> You would be wrong in at least three cases. I do not know where the others
> work or whether they work at all.
>
> And th
On Friday 01 April 2011 11:33:05 bryan hunt wrote:
> I'm just interested in discussing Linux related issues and perhaps going
> to the occasional meeting. (Full stop)
Then stick to doing that. And stop trolling.
Lisi
--
Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
Web Interface: https://mailman
On Friday 01 April 2011 12:10:10 bryan hunt wrote:
> I'm guessing a large part of the responders, and this is a complete shot
> in the dark - are employed by such institutions and as such with brook
> no criticism.
You would be wrong in at least three cases. I do not know where the others
work o
On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 10:52 +, Andy Smith wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 10:16:33AM +0100, bryan hunt wrote:
> > If you (or someone you can influence) runs the list, and you (or they)
> > don't like my opinions, feel free to unsubscribe me.
>
> At this point I personally would just prefer i
On Fri, 01 Apr 2011 11:46:14 +0100, bryan hunt wrote:
On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 11:07 +0100, Michael Pavling wrote:
On 1 April 2011 10:16, bryan hunt wrote:
> Grow up, and message me on list. I'm sure this has got more to do
with
> my mockery of your previous, pompous, posting than a concern for
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 10:16:33AM +0100, bryan hunt wrote:
> If you (or someone you can influence) runs the list, and you (or they)
> don't like my opinions, feel free to unsubscribe me.
At this point I personally would just prefer if you buggered off of
your own accord.
Andy
signature.asc
De
On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 11:07 +0100, Michael Pavling wrote:
> On 1 April 2011 10:16, bryan hunt wrote:
> > Grow up, and message me on list. I'm sure this has got more to do with
> > my mockery of your previous, pompous, posting than a concern for the
> > greater good.
>
> ... and I only read The Th
On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 10:28 +0100, Lisi wrote:
> On Friday 01 April 2011 10:16:33 bryan hunt wrote:
> > Grow up, and message me on list. I'm sure this has got more to do with
> > my mockery of your previous, pompous, posting than a concern for the
> > greater good.
>
> That is offensive. Adam is
On 1 April 2011 10:16, bryan hunt wrote:
> Grow up, and message me on list. I'm sure this has got more to do with
> my mockery of your previous, pompous, posting than a concern for the
> greater good.
... and I only read The Three Billy Goats Gruff to my daughter last night...
--
Please post to:
On Friday 01 April 2011 10:24:33 Vic wrote:
> > I've noticed that veto of discourse is a tradition peculiar to this
> > isle.
>
> There is no such "veto of discourse".
>
> There are, however, a number of us who consider your posts to be less than
> helpful, and who would be especially pleased were
On Friday 01 April 2011 10:16:33 bryan hunt wrote:
> Grow up, and message me on list. I'm sure this has got more to do with
> my mockery of your previous, pompous, posting than a concern for the
> greater good.
That is offensive. Adam is most emphatically not offensive, ever that I have
seen. T
> I've noticed that veto of discourse is a tradition peculiar to this
> isle.
There is no such "veto of discourse".
There are, however, a number of us who consider your posts to be less than
helpful, and who would be especially pleased were you not to post further.
> I, conversely, consider my
> I have not replied on list.
>
> Please do not post email like this again to this list, they are
> not helpful.
>
> Chris has put a lot of effort into securing the University venue
> for our use. We jump through whoops and we do not complain as we
> are not paying for the university. If you d
Chris
Can I thank you in advance for helping us to respect an organisation's
procedures, and for generously guiding us through them.
I think that like you, most responsible LUG members are reasonable enough to
acknowledge that security is dealt with in many ways, and for many reasons
that an outs
On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 08:03 +0100, Chris Malton wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> (With apologies for not sending via Adam first)
>
> Unfortunately, after some discussion with the Systems team at the
> University, I have had the wipe the DHCP database due to a fundamental
> flaw in the web form used to
Hi everyone,
(With apologies for not sending via Adam first)
Unfortunately, after some discussion with the Systems team at the
University, I have had the wipe the DHCP database due to a fundamental
flaw in the web form used to submit the data.
If you have already submitted DHCP requests, ple
21 matches
Mail list logo
