2009/8/1 Alan Pope :
> Did you miss my mail?
>
> http://hantslug.org.uk/lurker/message/20090731.093125.4d0316d0.en.html
Ahh I did miss it . By the way nice reply :)
* URLs to photos changing in the upgrade, breaking search engine fu,
and any inbound links from elsewhere.
* Increased load on the
2009/8/1 Steve Kemp :
> On Sat Aug 01, 2009 at 17:53:09 +0100, Alan Pope wrote:
>
>> "Mass generalisations are always wrong".
>
> Everybody generalises from one example, I know I do...
Well my generalisation was based on years of talking to system admins
of both windows and linux , website design
2009/8/1 pavithran :
> I opened the gallery in my firefox 3.6a and gallery works now perfectly .
> Looks like the template has been changed . Thanks for the prompt action .
>
Did you miss my mail?
http://hantslug.org.uk/lurker/message/20090731.093125.4d0316d0.en.html
Cheers,
Al.
--
Please post
2009/8/1 pavithran :
> 2009/8/1 Keith Edmunds :
>> Let's see some proof. Show us the source that fails to render correctly.
>
> Will do for sure in 5 hours . Right now I am at hartley library
> sitting on a ISS machine using windows XP + Internet explorer :)
I opened the gallery in my firefox 3.6a
On Sat Aug 01, 2009 at 17:53:09 +0100, Alan Pope wrote:
> "Mass generalisations are always wrong".
Everybody generalises from one example, I know I do...
Steve
--
Debian GNU/Linux System Administration
http://www.debian-administration.org/
--
Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
Web
On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 05:54:52PM +0100, pavithran wrote:
> 2009/7/31 Keith Edmunds :
>
> > So you're running alpha software and you've found a bug: excellent. Now
> > you need to establish whether Firefox is failing to correctly render valid
> > HTML/CSS/etc, or whether the site code is invalid.
2009/8/1 Keith Edmunds :
> Let's see some proof. Show us the source that fails to render correctly.
Will do for sure in 5 hours . Right now I am at hartley library
sitting on a ISS machine using windows XP + Internet explorer :)
Sorry for going off topic but check this
http://forum.susu.org/index.
2009/7/31 Philip Stubbs :
> Therefore I would suggest that makes you the most suitable person to
> do something about it.
I would be glad to
> Build a sample gallery, with whatever system you feel would work well,
> and then trial it somewhere.
Though it may sound like an ad for my pics LOL but I
On Sat, 1 Aug 2009 17:54:52 +0100, pavithra...@gmail.com said:
> Yes I run firefox 3.6 alpha but it gets updated every 6 hours or so
> hence I belive in the firefox developer community to write a browser
> which properly renders HTML,CSS and JS .
One wonders why they need to update it, then.
You
2009/7/31 Keith Edmunds :
> So you're running alpha software and you've found a bug: excellent. Now
> you need to establish whether Firefox is failing to correctly render valid
> HTML/CSS/etc, or whether the site code is invalid. Even in the second case
> there is still an argument for reporting t
2009/8/1 pavithran :
> 2009/7/31 Lisi :
>> On Friday 31 July 2009 03:15:12 pavithran wrote:
>>> Aren't we as linux users
>>> on Cutting edge ?
>>
>> No
>
> I don't agree :P
> I could rather say :
>
> Linux sys admins and people afraid of change : No to cutting edge
> Developers and Geeks : Yes to
2009/7/31 Lisi :
> On Friday 31 July 2009 03:15:12 pavithran wrote:
>> Aren't we as linux users
>> on Cutting edge ?
>
> No
I don't agree :P
I could rather say :
Linux sys admins and people afraid of change : No to cutting edge
Developers and Geeks : Yes to cutting/bleeding edge .
Regards,
Pav
On 07/31/2009 10:57 AM, Lisi wrote:
On Friday 31 July 2009 03:15:12 pavithran wrote:
Aren't we as linux users
on Cutting edge ?
No
Lisi
I'd agree with that, it is sometimes referred to as the "Bleeding Edge"
for a reason!
I like to live by the "if it ain't broke, don't fix i
On Friday 31 July 2009 03:15:12 pavithran wrote:
> Aren't we as linux users
> on Cutting edge ?
No
Lisi
--
Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
--
Alan Pope wrote:
> * Increased load on the server as the new version of gallery
> introduces cpu-intensive photo scaling features.
>
> If anyone has experience of mitigating these two outstanding issues
> then I'm happy for us to move with the times and move to gallery2.
>
I'm sure there'll be
Hi Pavithran,
I'm the (current) web master for HantsLUG so I guess I can answer some
of your questions/concerns.
2009/7/30 pavithran :
> The pictures at http://hants.lug.org.uk/gallery/ are really good but
> the gallery software looks too old :(
>
It's gallery 1.5.4 which has been around a while
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 03:15:12AM +0100, pavithran wrote:
> 2009/7/30 Hugo Mills :
>
> >> 1. Please update the gallery software
> >
> > Without meaning to come across as a miserable curmudgeon(*), what
> > would newer software gain, other than a fleeting warm fuzzy feeling of
> > running someth
2009/7/31 pavithran :
> 2009/7/30 Hugo Mills :
>>
>> Take more recent pics, then? :)
>
>> Then go ahead and add them...
> I haven't been to any of the hantslug meets so I neither could upload
> or recognise members .
> I will surely come to the next meet and do it :)
Hi Pavithran,
The respons
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 03:15:12 +0100, pavithra...@gmail.com said:
> Well no wrong in using the old gallery software . But the reason for
> my mail was the gallery didn't render properly in my Minefield 3.6a (
> firefox 3.6 alpha ) browser .
So you're running alpha software and you've found a bug:
2009/7/30 Hugo Mills :
>> 1. Please update the gallery software
>
> Without meaning to come across as a miserable curmudgeon(*), what
> would newer software gain, other than a fleeting warm fuzzy feeling of
> running something up to date, and an indefinable odour of undiscovered
> security flaws
James,
Can you email me a screenshot showing how it fails to render. I have
viewed that page using 3.5.1 and it seems ok.
Stephen D
--
Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk
Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire
LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk
2009/7/30 Stephen Davies :
> If the software being used is Gallery V1 then it can be upgraded to V2.
> AFAIK, V1 is not being actively developed any more
>
> I used Gallery 2 when constructing the Aldershot & Farnham Camera Club
> site. I was able to customize the software quite easily to give me t
If the software being used is Gallery V1 then it can be upgraded to V2.
AFAIK, V1 is not being actively developed any more
I used Gallery 2 when constructing the Aldershot & Farnham Camera Club
site. I was able to customize the software quite easily to give me the
finish we required.
I you want
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 11:22:35 +0100
Hugo Mills wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 01:38:13AM +0100, pavithran wrote:
> > The pictures at http://hants.lug.org.uk/gallery/ are really good but
> > the gallery software looks too old :(
> >
> > Here are my requests:
> > 1. Please update the gallery soft
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 01:38:13AM +0100, pavithran wrote:
> The pictures at http://hants.lug.org.uk/gallery/ are really good but
> the gallery software looks too old :(
>
> Here are my requests:
> 1. Please update the gallery software
Without meaning to come across as a miserable curmudgeon(*
Hi lug,
The pictures at http://hants.lug.org.uk/gallery/ are really good but
the gallery software looks too old :(
Here are my requests:
1. Please update the gallery software
2 . Use some candy template ( but usable)
3. Upload more recent pics
Having said all that I am very happy to see old pic
26 matches
Mail list logo
