Hello,
I am wanting to move to HAProxy for my load balancing solution. Over
all I have been greatly impressed with it. It has way more throughput
and can handle way more connections then our current LB Solution
(nginx). I have been noticing one issue in all of our tests though, it
seems like in
Can't find 1.4.16 at http://haproxy.1wt.eu/download/1.4/src/ ?
Bests,
-Igor
2011/6/9 Hervé COMMOWICK hcommow...@exosec.fr:
Hello Matt,
You need to activate logging to see what occurs to your requests, you
can use halog tool (in the contrib folder) to filter out fast
requests.
Other
As i say, it is not yet released, get the snapshot or wait a week.
Hervé.
On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 17:43:51 +0800
Igor j...@owind.com wrote:
Can't find 1.4.16 at http://haproxy.1wt.eu/download/1.4/src/ ?
Bests,
-Igor
2011/6/9 Hervé COMMOWICK hcommow...@exosec.fr:
Hello Matt,
You
Dearly Beloved,
My name is Mrs. Elizabeth KrUger; I am a dying woman who has decided to donate
what i have to you/charitable organisation. I am 69 years old and i was
diagnosed with cancer immediately after the death of my husband 2 years ago,
who has left me everything he worked for and
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 7:33 AM, habeeb rahman pk.h...@gmail.com wrote:
apache rewrite rule:
RewriteRule ^/(.*)$ http://127.0.0.1:2443%{REQUEST_URI} [P,QSA,L]
Why are you using a rewrite instead of mod_proxy?
ProxyPass does some nice things by default, like adding the
X-Forwarded-For header
James,
Thanks for your points. Rewrite rule was set up by some other guys and is
being used for some time now and works well with round robin.
Anyhow I will look at mod_proxy in detail. Not sure how SSL termination can
be done with it and moreover how haproxy gonna balance based on client IP.
Any
Hi,
we are using haproxy only in tcp mode.
Actually we have the problem that we see broken requests on our backend
server, but we cannot see which client group is causing the problem.
That's because we only see the IP and the source port of haproxy in our
server logs and the client IP and
Habeeb,
given your Apache does actually insert/append an X-Forwarded-For header
you can use this statement instead of balance source in HAProxy:
balance hdr(X-Forwarded-For)
This has a few caveats you should be aware. Users can set the
X-Forwarded-Header themselves (which is done by some
Haproxy lets me provide a static page that's returned when 503 and
other error conditions are triggered. With monitor-uri though, I'm
not able to customize the 200 response. What is the right way to
request that feature?
-Matt
I turned on those two options and seemed to help a little.
We don't have a 2.6.30+ kernel so I don't believe option
splice-response will work(?). Thats one of the things I'm going to try
next.
I used halog to narrow down the sample, it was still a few 100 lines
so I picked three at random.
Jun
Hi, I am a rookie for operation of computer networks.
I am trying to utilize haproxy to do load balance according to a
client's location.
I have found some tool to get the client location by the client himself.
I hope the client can periodically send the information of his
location to haproxy, and
Hi Matt,
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 11:37:00AM -0700, Matt Christiansen wrote:
I turned on those two options and seemed to help a little.
We don't have a 2.6.30+ kernel so I don't believe option
splice-response will work(?). Thats one of the things I'm going to try
next.
Splicing is OK since
I am sure it's been asked before, I can find some vague references on how to
accomplish this but nothing that does not include recompiling the kernel. I
think these posts are out of date. So, sorry in advance but here's the
question. I have about 1000 listen (groups) and need to pass the client
If you need to pass the client IP you simply need to enable x-forwarded-for
(option forwardfor).
If you truly need transparent load balancing then depending on what Linux OS
and version you are running you MIGHT very well need to recompile the kernel
and iptables. For the one environment that
Hi Alexey,
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 01:32:06PM +0400, Alexey Vlasov wrote:
Hi!
Here, actually, I've found the description of the same problem. At
Apache falling/restart, haproxy returns to users 502 error.
http://www.formilux.org/archives/haproxy/0812/1575.html
Here I give the example of
Hi Robert,
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 04:23:46PM -0400, Robert Lassiter wrote:
I am sure it's been asked before, I can find some vague references on how to
accomplish this but nothing that does not include recompiling the kernel. I
think these posts are out of date. So, sorry in advance but
Hi Andreas,
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 03:55:46PM +0200, Andreas wrote:
Hi,
we are using haproxy only in tcp mode.
Actually we have the problem that we see broken requests on our backend
server, but we cannot see which client group is causing the problem.
That's because we only see the
Hi Willy,
I agree the haproxy logs show that, but we also monitor the time spent
processing the request which takes in to account, GC, reading data off
the FS and a number of things inside the app and I see no 3sec times
in there or anything near it. Also I have no 3 sec outliers in output
from
Hi Matt,
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 01:50:11PM -0700, Matt Christiansen wrote:
Hi Willy,
I agree the haproxy logs show that, but we also monitor the time spent
processing the request which takes in to account, GC, reading data off
the FS and a number of things inside the app and I see no 3sec
Hi Guillaume,
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 05:10:09PM -0400, Guillaume Bourque wrote:
Hi all,
I have haproxy 1.4.10 running fine.q
One or twice a day I have some healt check failed in my stat page where can
I look to find when this health check has failed to try to find out what it
cause it
I added in the tun.bufsize 65536 and right away things got better, I
doubled that to 131072 and all of the outliers went way. Set at that
with my tests it looks like haproxy is faster then nginx on 95% of
responses and on par with nginx for the last 5% which is fine with me
=).
What is the
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 04:04:26PM -0700, Matt Christiansen wrote:
I added in the tun.bufsize 65536 and right away things got better, I
doubled that to 131072 and all of the outliers went way. Set at that
with my tests it looks like haproxy is faster then nginx on 95% of
responses and on par
22 matches
Mail list logo
