I get this socket error:
haproxy[63881]: Server adserver.dev.adworxs.net/adserver2.dev is DOWN,
reason: Socket error, check duration: 8ms. 1 active and 0 backup servers
left. 0 sessions active, 0 requeued, 0 remaining in queue.
The check duration changes with every error entry, and a manual
Thank you for all your help.
I've fixed the problem now in configuring the backends to just answer
with a index.php file as default, for every unspecific request. That
seems to solve the problem for now.
Greets
Sebastian
On 10.02.2012 14:12, Graeme Donaldson wrote:
On 10 February 2012 14:50,
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Sebastian Fohler i...@far-galaxy.com wrote:
I get this socket error:
haproxy[63881]: Server adserver.dev.adworxs.net/adserver2.dev is DOWN,
reason: Socket error, check duration: 8ms. 1 active and 0 backup servers
left. 0 sessions active, 0 requeued, 0
This is the definition of the backend checks:
server adserver2 192.168.10.61:80 check inter 24 we
ight 100
listen adserver.adworxs.net
bind192.168.10.68:80
modehttp
log global
I've checked the values Willy posted on the haproxy page. All my
hardware configurations should meet the needs of haproxy. Still I have
major performance problems. How do I best find out why? The logs tell me
not nearly anything I neec to now to fix that problems. Since I use vm's
to try
Hi Sebastian,
Please, help us. You create too many threads at a time for too many
different problems (or sometimes for the exact same issue), where most
of the time the answer is in the documentation.
It's really difficult to follow you. At this time, in this new thread, I
can't guess which
2012/2/12 Sebastian Fohler i...@far-galaxy.com:
I've checked the values Willy posted on the haproxy page. All my hardware
configurations should meet the needs of haproxy. Still I have major
performance problems. How do I best find out why? The logs tell me not
nearly anything I neec to now to
The memory usage right now is around 65% now. So that shouldn't be the
problem.
We are talking about around 9 MBps Traffic, for around 700 session in
short times for every webserver which are four right now.
On 12.02.2012 12:24, Łukasz Jagiełło wrote:
2012/2/12 Sebastian
2012/2/12 Łukasz Jagiełło jagiello.luk...@gmail.com:
2012/2/12 Sebastian Fohler i...@far-galaxy.com:
I've checked the values Willy posted on the haproxy page. All my hardware
configurations should meet the needs of haproxy. Still I have major
performance problems. How do I best find out why?
Sorry I thought it's a completly different thread since it does not
address the check problems at all.
But if it would have been better to leave all those questions in one
thread, I apologize.
The values I'm talking about are the performance examples to be found on
the haproxy website, so not
Hi Sebastian,
Can you take a screenshot of your stats page and share it with us?
Then, please do the changes below in your configuration:
turn nbproc to 1
increase the maxconn on the frontend to 4000
cheers
Hi,
On 12.02.2012 12:54, Baptiste wrote:
lukaszatjagiellodotorg
Hi,
When speaking about virtualization, there are so many factors to take
into account.
- which hypervisor are we speaking about ?
VMWare ESXi 5.0
- what phisical NIC are using?
Broadcom Corporation Broadcom NetXtreme II
I did sent you the screenshot, before the changes.
Just to clear that out.
How do I know that HAProxy is taking all the CPU resources?
PFSense shows the CPU and NIC Traffic resources, I get a rising CPU load
until it's 100% and after that haproxy stops the adserver.adworxs.net
frontend the
Le 12/02/2012 13:21, Sebastian Fohler a écrit :
Hi,
On 12.02.2012 12:54, Baptiste wrote:
lukaszatjagiellodotorg
Hi,
When speaking about virtualization, there are so many factors to take
into account.
- which hypervisor are we speaking about ?
VMWare ESXi 5.0
Take into account that
On 12.02.2012 14:24, Cyril Bonté wrote:
Take into account that virtualization can be a bottleneck for a
network component like haproxy.
I know that, that's the reason I used one physical nic especially for
the haproxy instances.
Sure there could still be some problem, but that would be a
Your nbproc is still 2.
You should turn it to 1.
You should also remove the option httpclose, replacing it by option
http-server-close.
It will save some packets on the client side.
Are the backend servers VMs too?
Are they hosted on the same vsphere server?
How many physical network cards are
I've changed nbproc to 1 now, as I did change the httpclose option, it
seems to help a little.
The adserver.adworxs.net backends are physical servers.
The adserver.dev.adworxs.net backends are vm's.
There are four physical NICs used by the vsphere server.
Greets,
Sebastian
On 12.02.2012 14:42,
On the last screenshot you set, you had a lot of retries...
Which means there may be some issues for your HAProxy to reach the
server sometimes.
Have you checked all the network settings (speed and duplex) on both
servers (web and vsphere) and switches?
I've noticed that too.
The problem is, when I try to reach the backendservers themselves (they
are all reachable by there own name, adserve1/adserver2/...). The don't
show any problems at all, the question in that case is, how do I find
out which error they throw, seen from the lb end.
Sure I
Le 12/02/2012 22:31, Sebastian Fohler a écrit :
I've noticed that too.
The problem is, when I try to reach the backendservers themselves (they
are all reachable by there own name, adserve1/adserver2/...). The don't
show any problems at all, the question in that case is, how do I find
out which
Hi Sander,
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 04:28:39PM +0100, Sander Klein wrote:
Hi All,
I'm having a small problem with non RFC2616 requests. I would like to
log them, but haproxy only logs:
cluster1-in cluster1-in/NOSRV -1/-1/-1/-1/0 400 1951 - - PR--
235/235/0/0/0 0/0 {|||} {} BADREQ
Is
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 08:01:11AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 09:12:47AM +0100, Sebastian Fohler wrote:
I get this socket error:
haproxy[63881]: Server adserver.dev.adworxs.net/adserver2.dev is DOWN,
reason: Socket error, check duration: 8ms. 1 active and 0
22 matches
Mail list logo
