Hi again Kevin,
Well, I suspect that there might be a corner case with the bug I fixed
which might have caused what you observed.
The "timeout connect" is computed from the last expire date. Since
"timeout check" was added upon connection establishment but the task
was woken too late, then that a
Hi Kevin,
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 09:01:43PM -0500, Lange, Kevin M. (GSFC-423.0)[RAYTHEON
COMPANY] wrote:
> Monsieur Tarreau,
>
> Actually, we are seeing frontend service availability flapping. This morning
> particularly. Missing from my snippet is the logic for an unplanned outage
> landing p
Dear Reader,
Invitation to attend GOAL’s next workshop led by - Tanya Vaislev,
Senior Manager, Legal Cisco Systems, Inc., USA
Topic: Strategic Management of Technology and Resources to Increase
Attorney Productivity
Venue: At your desk: On your Laptop/PC or Phone
Date: 29 May 2012
Time: 9:00 am
Hi,
I'm jut guessing, but to me it can work for URLs only, so in your
case, it will match "/", "/customer/12345", and
"/some/path?customerId=12345".
For now, the string table can't have a concatenated string of 2
information, Host header and URL in your case.
But who knows, maybe this feature will
Hi Lange,
Would it be possible to take a trace (tcpdump) of the health check?
This may help as well.
Cheers
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 4:01 AM, Lange, Kevin M. (GSFC-423.0)[RAYTHEON
COMPANY] wrote:
> Monsieur Tarreau,
>
> Actually, we are seeing frontend service availability flapping. This mornin
Monsieur Tarreau,
Actually, we are seeing frontend service availability flapping. This morning
particularly. Missing from my snippet is the logic for an unplanned outage
landing page, that our customers were seeing this morning, so it haproxy truly
is "timing out" and marking each backend as d
Hi,
This implements the feature discussed in the earlier thread of killing
connections on backup servers when a non-backup server comes back up. For
example, you can use this to route to a mysql master & slave and ensure
clients don't stay on the slave after the master goes from down->up. I've
I've already put an upgrade to haproxy in place.
Kevin M Lange
Mission Operations and Services
NASA EOSDIS Evolution and Development
Intelligence and Information Systems
Raytheon Company
+1 (301) 851-8450 (office)
+1 (301) 807-2457 (cell)
kevin.m.la...@nasa.gov
kla...@raytheon.com
5700 Rive
Err...more precisely...
HA-Proxy version 1.4.15 2011/04/08
Copyright 2000-2010 Willy Tarreau
Build options :
TARGET = linux26
CPU = generic
CC = gcc
CFLAGS = -O2 -g -fno-strict-aliasing
OPTIONS = USE_REGPARM=1 USE_PCRE=1
Default settings :
maxconn = 2000, bufsize = 16384,
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 04:31:39PM -0500, Lange, Kevin M. (GSFC-423.0)[RAYTHEON
COMPANY] wrote:
> I thought it was a bug in the reporting, considering we've played with
> numerous values for the various timeouts as an experiment, but wanted your
> thoughts.
> This is v1.4.15.
>
> [root@opsslb1
I thought it was a bug in the reporting, considering we've played with numerous
values for the various timeouts as an experiment, but wanted your thoughts.
This is v1.4.15.
[root@opsslb1 log]# haproxy -v
HA-Proxy version 1.4.15 2011/04/08
Copyright 2000-2010 Willy Tarreau
On May 24, 2012, at 5
Hi Kevin,
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 04:04:03PM -0500, Lange, Kevin M. (GSFC-423.0)[RAYTHEON
COMPANY] wrote:
> Hi,
> We're having odd behavior (apparently have always but didn't realize it),
> where our backend httpchks "time out":
>
> May 24 04:03:33 opsslb1 haproxy[4594]: Server webapp_ops_bk/we
Hi,
We're having odd behavior (apparently have always but didn't realize it), where
our backend httpchks "time out":
May 24 04:03:33 opsslb1 haproxy[4594]: Server webapp_ops_bk/webapp_ops1 is
DOWN, reason: Layer7 timeout, check duration: 1002ms. 0 active and 0 backup
servers left. 1 sessions ac
> > Hi!
> >
> > I'm trying to use HAproxy to support the concepts of "offline", "in
> > maintenance mode", and "not working" servers.
>
> Any good reason to do that???
> (I'm a bit curious)
Sure. I want to be able to mark a machine offline by creating a file (as
opposed to marking it online by
Baptiste,
Whenever this feature will be implemented, will it work for a specific url
like:
subdomain1.example.com
What about by query string? like:
www.example.com/customer/12345
or
www.example.com/some/path?customerId=12345
Will it work for all the above?
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 9:38 PM,
On Thursday, May 24, 2012 01:59:32 AM Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 01:12:14AM -0700, Justin Karneges wrote:
> > Well, the network could fail at anytime and have a similar effect. I'm
> > not sure if killing all connections to the backup is really any worse
> > than killing all con
Hi,
Just for archive: CVE-2012-2391
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/05/23/15
Kevin Decherf - M: +33 681194547 - T: @Kdecherf
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 9:30 PM, Vivek Malik wrote:
> A recommended upgrade for all production users. While we are not
> (generally) affected by th
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 01:12:14AM -0700, Justin Karneges wrote:
>> Well, the network could fail at anytime and have a similar effect. I'm not
>> sure
>> if killing all connections to the backup is really any worse than killing all
>> conne
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 01:12:14AM -0700, Justin Karneges wrote:
> Well, the network could fail at anytime and have a similar effect. I'm not
> sure
> if killing all connections to the backup is really any worse than killing all
> connections to the non-backup (via on-marked-down). Either way a
On Wednesday, May 23, 2012 11:57:14 PM Willy Tarreau wrote:
> There is an option at the server level which is "on-marked-down
> shutdown-session". It achieves exactly what you want, it will kill all
> connections to a server which is detected as down.
Perfect!
> > 2) If the master eventually come
20 matches
Mail list logo