Hi,
thank you for confirming.
Best regards,
Annika
---
Systemadministration
Travian Games GmbH
Wilhelm-Wagenfeld-Str. 22
80807 München
Germany
Tel: +49 / (0)89 / 324 915 - 171
Fax: +49 / (0)89 / 324 915 - 970
a.wick...@traviangames.com
www.traviangames.de
Sitz der Gesellschaft München
AG
Hi everybody,
we have a few regarding load at our Haproxy 1.5-dev19 cluster. We run
constantly at a load of 12 - 15 most of it is system load. I started to do
debugging with strace and see constantly the following message:
epoll_ctl(0, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, 1541, {EPOLLIN|0x2000, {u32=1541,
We are sorry that you decided to opt-out.
We confirm that this email account haproxy@formilux.org has un-subscribed.
Hi Annika,
we have a few regarding load at our Haproxy 1.5-dev19 cluster.
We run constantly at a load of 12 - 15 most of it is system load.
[...]
On our old cluster i do not see any of the Resource temporarily
unavailable” at splicing operation.
We can't tell if that kind of load is
There are some bugs with splice in 1.5-dev19... they have been fixed.
See this thread for the patches:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.haproxy/12774
(Or google for: Oh and by the way, the bug was present since 1.5-dev12. )
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Lukas Tribus
Hi,
I am sorry I forgot to attach the necessary files :x.
On 09 Dec 2013, at 14:56, Lukas Tribus luky...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi Annika,
we have a few regarding load at our Haproxy 1.5-dev19 cluster.
We run constantly at a load of 12 - 15 most of it is system load.
[...]
On our old
Hi,
On 08.12.2013 21:34, Igor wrote:
Hi, it may like stunnel's client mode.
In haproxy, we may get like this to terminate SSL server to HTTP server.
listen http
bind: 80
mode ssl-client
use-server sslsrv 127.0.0.1:443
I think this should work
--
listen http :80
mode http
server
Hi,
There are some bugs with splice in 1.5-dev19... they have been fixed.
See this thread for the patches:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.haproxy/12774
(Or google for: Oh and by the way, the bug was present since 1.5-dev12. )
thank you for the hint. I will try this on
Hi,
There are some bugs with splice in 1.5-dev19... they have been fixed.
See this thread for the patches:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.haproxy/12774
(Or google for: Oh and by the way, the bug was present since 1.5-dev12. )
This is not what Annika is seeing; that bug is
include/common/time.h:111:29: warning: implicit conversion from
'unsigned long' to '__darwin_suseconds_t' (aka 'int') changes value
from
18446744073709551615 to -1 [-Wconstant-conversion]
tv-tv_sec = tv-tv_usec = TV_ETERNITY;
~ ^~~
Thanks Thomas and Lukas, that's what I look for.
Bests,
-Igor
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 10:17 PM, Thomas Heil
h...@terminal-consulting.de wrote:
Hi,
On 08.12.2013 21:34, Igor wrote:
Hi, it may like stunnel's client mode.
In haproxy, we may get like this to terminate SSL server to HTTP
Hi,
listen http
bind: 80
mode ssl-client
use-server sslsrv 127.0.0.1:443
I think this should work
--
listen http :80
mode http
server sslsrv 127.0.0.1:443 ssl
--
Yes exactly, or something like this when using the frontend/backend approach:
frontend myfrontend
mode http
bind :80
Hi,
Hi
There are some bugs with splice in 1.5-dev19... they have been fixed.
See this thread for the patches:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.haproxy/12774
(Or google for: Oh and by the way, the bug was present since 1.5-dev12. )
This is not what Annika is seeing; that bug is about
Hi,
For testing we disabled splicing on one of the cluster members on the
new cluster (after succesfull tests). Now load drops below 8 from 16.
So I maybe try it with splice-auto and if that does not help with a
new haproxy build with the following git commits:
Yes, but please fix the
http://goo.gl/e6FzJp работа на не вредит глазам
Dear HAProxy community,
First of all thank you for the wonderful work and the support contained
within the archives of this emailing list.
I am trying to protect a specific endpoint of my application (let's assume
that it ends with /athanasios) and only that endpoint. The limits that I am
trying
Hi, after upgraded to haproxy-ss-20131207, haproxy failed to start due
to the errors:
[ALERT] 343/024837 (19081) : parsing [/etc/haproxy/conf.conf:15] :
error detected while parsing a 'rspideny' condition : missing args for
fetch method 'table_cnt' in sample expression 'table_cnt'.
[ALERT]
Hi,
On 09.12.2013 20:14, Igor wrote:
Hi, after upgraded to haproxy-ss-20131207, haproxy failed to start due
to the errors:
[ALERT] 343/024837 (19081) : parsing [/etc/haproxy/conf.conf:15] :
error detected while parsing a 'rspideny' condition : missing args for
fetch method 'table_cnt' in
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 8:07 PM, Athanasios | ZenGuard
athanas...@zenguard.org wrote:
Dear HAProxy community,
First of all thank you for the wonderful work and the support contained
within the archives of this emailing list.
I am trying to protect a specific endpoint of my application (let's
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 7:03 PM, Igor j...@owind.com wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible to create ACL that based on destination host's IP in
HTTP mode? For example,
acl n1 dst_ip 1.1.1.1
use_backend b1 if n1
if request host: u2.abc.com has IP 1.1.1.1, it will use backend b1.
Thanks.
Bests,
Hi Clemence,
If I were you, I would ask HAProxy to forward client IP address in an
header named differently than X-Forwarded-For, something like
X-Client-IP.
Then configure you nginx to log the IP found in X-Client-IP and you're done.
Baptiste
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 7:00 AM, Qingshan Xie xieq...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hello Experts,
not sure if this subject was already discussed or not, like to hear the
advices and suggestions.
If a single HAProxy instance as a load-balancer could not handle the
high-load traffic, how to scale multiple
On 4 Dec 2013 16:23, Chris Burroughs chris.burrou...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/03/2013 04:07 PM, Chris Burroughs wrote:
This could just be me not being adept at email patches. Sorry if this
is obvious but is this supposed to apply against 1.4 or 1.5?
To answer my own question this applies
On 12/09/2013 05:02 PM, James Hogarth wrote:
To answer yes it is against 1.5 ... The caveats are the peers don't work
and the session table and load balancing can get messed up due to the lack
of shared information between processes but if you just need to utilise
multiple stat sockets and the
Hi Igor,
include/common/time.h:111:29: warning: implicit conversion from
'unsigned long' to '__darwin_suseconds_t' (aka 'int') changes value
from
18446744073709551615 to -1 [-Wconstant-conversion]
tv-tv_sec = tv-tv_usec = TV_ETERNITY;
~ ^~~
include/common/time.h:32:26: note:
Hi,
Hello Experts,
not sure if this subject was already discussed or not, like to hear the
advices and suggestions.
If a single HAProxy instance as a load-balancer could not handle the
high-load traffic, how to scale multiple instances as a group of
load-balancers to handle the high-load?
Hi folks,
On Sat, 23 Nov 2013 12:05:24 +0100
Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote:
Hi Mark-Antoine,
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 07:37:21PM +0900, Marc-Antoine Perennou wrote:
I don't have access to a computer to actually test those, but:
- the first one looks nice, never felt really confident
Hi Lukas,
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 01:12:59AM +0100, Lukas Tribus wrote:
Hi folks,
On Sat, 23 Nov 2013 12:05:24 +0100
Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote:
Hi Mark-Antoine,
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 07:37:21PM +0900, Marc-Antoine Perennou wrote:
I don't have access to a computer to
28 matches
Mail list logo
