Goodbye from our Newsletter

2014-04-17 Thread Tu Informe
Goodbye from our Newsletter, sorry to see you go. You have been unsubscribed from our newsletters. This is the last email you will receive from us. Our newsletter system, phpList, will refuse to send you any further messages, without manual intervention by our administrator. If

Re: strange error message unknown keyword 'tcp-request' in 'backend' section

2014-04-17 Thread Ghislain
Le 16/04/2014 17:34, Willy Tarreau a écrit : Hi, Just a guess, I suspect that Ghislain also has 1.3 running on this machine, and it might be the version found inthe path or referenced in the startup script. Willy Hi, you are dam rigth ! this is a version 1.3 that give the message not the

Re: Ubuntu 14.04 package

2014-04-17 Thread pablo platt
Thank you, this is extremely helpful. On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Vincent Bernat ber...@luffy.cx wrote: ❦ 12 avril 2014 12:49 CEST, pablo platt pablo.pl...@gmail.com : Is there a 1.5~dev22 deb package for Ubuntu 14.04 (trusty)? I've found the following ppa but it only has package

Re: strange error message unknown keyword 'tcp-request' in 'backend' section

2014-04-17 Thread Ghislain
to answer my own side question, 1.3.15 so no tcp-request, it was added in 1.3.16 of course ;p best regards, Ghislain.

RE: Regarding Haproxy Configuration

2014-04-17 Thread Lukas Tribus
Hi, Dear Sir Can you help me about how to redirect request in case if one of the server is down. Is there any command for this or I have to change in configuration file. Please respond to the mailing list, not me directly. I refer you to the documentation for informations about

separate traffic by domain

2014-04-17 Thread Fabrizio Fichera
Hi, With Haproxy 1.4 how do I separate traffic by domain in mod tcp? Example: mysql traffic In Haproxy with layer 4 not work hdr_dom I was thinking something like: frontend bind 0.0.0.0: mode tcp acl app1 hdr_dom(host) -i app1.mydomain.com acl app2 hdr_dom(host) -i app2.mydomain.com Best

Re: separate traffic by domain

2014-04-17 Thread Thierry FOURNIER
On Thu, 17 Apr 2014 10:43:41 +0200 Fabrizio Fichera fabriziofich...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, With Haproxy 1.4 how do I separate traffic by domain in mod tcp? Example: mysql traffic In Haproxy with layer 4 not work hdr_dom I was thinking something like: frontend bind 0.0.0.0: mode tcp

Re: Ubuntu 14.04 package

2014-04-17 Thread Vincent Bernat
❦ 17 avril 2014 08:59 CEST, Vincent Bernat ber...@luffy.cx : Is there a 1.5~dev22 deb package for Ubuntu 14.04 (trusty)? I've found the following ppa but it only has package for Ubuntu 13.10 and below. https://launchpad.net/~vbernat/+archive/haproxy-1.5 I will update the repository this

Segfault during soft-stop

2014-04-17 Thread Apollon Oikonomopoulos
Hi all, Current master segfaults during soft-stop with the following config: global log /dev/loglocal0 frontend test mode http bind 127.0.0.1: bind ::1: redirect prefix http://example.com gdb shows: Program received signal SIGUSR1, User

Re: Segfault during soft-stop

2014-04-17 Thread Apollon Oikonomopoulos
Hi Lukas, On 12:09 Thu 17 Apr , Lukas Tribus wrote: Hi, gdb shows: Program received signal SIGUSR1, User defined signal 1. [WARNING] 106/123715 (18187) : Stopping frontend test in 0 ms. Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x in ?? () (gdb)

RE: Segfault during soft-stop

2014-04-17 Thread Lukas Tribus
Hi, Can you compile with CFLAGS=-g -O0 in the make command, to avoid that the compiler optimizes out to much and provide the gdb output of backtrace full? Strange, after a full cleanup and rebuild it doesn't segfault anymore, so please disregard this and apologies for the noise. Can you

Re: Segfault during soft-stop

2014-04-17 Thread Apollon Oikonomopoulos
On 12:30 Thu 17 Apr , Lukas Tribus wrote: Hi, Can you compile with CFLAGS=-g -O0 in the make command, to avoid that the compiler optimizes out to much and provide the gdb output of backtrace full? Strange, after a full cleanup and rebuild it doesn't segfault anymore, so please

Re: Recommended strategy for running 1.5 in production

2014-04-17 Thread Kobus Bensch
Hi List I use haproxy on centos. I regularly build a RPM I then use in spacewalk to first roll out to test, then post testing to production. This process works great as if we need to roll back we can do that very easily. Kobus On 17/04/2014 08:10, Vincent Bernat wrote: ❦ 16 avril 2014

Re: RFC: removal of bsd and osx Makefiles

2014-04-17 Thread Morgan Aldridge
On Monday, April 14, 2014, Lukas Tribus luky...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi list, this is to request comments regarding the removal of bsd and osx Makfiles. Its was proposed by Willy Tarreau, the reason are: - osx and bsd Makefiles don't support USE flag, so they can't be used if SSL, ZLIB and

Re: RFC: removal of bsd and osx Makefiles

2014-04-17 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi Morgan, On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 07:17:19AM -0400, Morgan Aldridge wrote: On Monday, April 14, 2014, Lukas Tribus luky...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi list, this is to request comments regarding the removal of bsd and osx Makfiles. Its was proposed by Willy Tarreau, the reason are: -

Re: Segfault during soft-stop

2014-04-17 Thread Thierry FOURNIER
On Thu, 17 Apr 2014 13:36:47 +0300 Apollon Oikonomopoulos apoi...@debian.org wrote: On 12:30 Thu 17 Apr , Lukas Tribus wrote: Hi, Can you compile with CFLAGS=-g -O0 in the make command, to avoid that the compiler optimizes out to much and provide the gdb output of backtrace

RE: RFC: removal of bsd and osx Makefiles

2014-04-17 Thread Lukas Tribus
Hi, Migrating to linux.  Like Willy explained, BSD and OSX continue to be fully supported with GNU make, the proposal is just to drop the specific Makefiles, which is obsolete anyway, because of a lot of missing features (like zlib). This will actually simplify building haproxy under OSX

[PATCH 0/3] systemd wrapper improvements

2014-04-17 Thread Apollon Oikonomopoulos
Hi, The following patches improve the systemd wrapper in a couple of ways: - The systemd wrapper itself is now re-executed on SIGUSR2, allowing a new version of both HAProxy and the wrapper to be gracefully loaded. - We use standard error for message logging, which seems to get more

[PATCH 1/3] MINOR: systemd wrapper: re-execute on SIGUSR2

2014-04-17 Thread Apollon Oikonomopoulos
Re-execute the systemd wrapper on SIGUSR2 and before reloading HAProxy, making it possible to load a completely new version of HAProxy (including a new version of the systemd wrapper) gracefully. Since the wrapper accepts no command-line arguments of its own, re-execution is signaled using the

[PATCH 3/3] MINOR: systemd wrapper: propagate exit status

2014-04-17 Thread Apollon Oikonomopoulos
Use HAProxy's exit status as the systemd wrapper's exit status instead of always returning EXIT_SUCCESS, permitting the use of systemd's `Restart = on-failure' logic. --- src/haproxy-systemd-wrapper.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git

[PATCH 2/3] MINOR: systemd wrapper: improve logging

2014-04-17 Thread Apollon Oikonomopoulos
Use standard error for logging messages, as it seems that this gets messages to the systemd journal more reliably. Also use systemd's support for specifying log levels via stderr to apply different levels to messages. --- src/haproxy-systemd-wrapper.c | 15 +-- 1 file changed, 9

Re: [PATCH 0/3] systemd wrapper improvements

2014-04-17 Thread Marc-Antoine Perennou
Hi, On Thursday, April 17, 2014, Apollon Oikonomopoulos apoi...@debian.org wrote: Hi, The following patches improve the systemd wrapper in a couple of ways: - The systemd wrapper itself is now re-executed on SIGUSR2, allowing a new version of both HAProxy and the wrapper to be

Re: Recommended strategy for running 1.5 in production

2014-04-17 Thread Ryan O'Hara
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 11:12:07PM +0100, Kobus Bensch wrote: I use haproxy on centos. So I build a RPM i then use in spacewalk to first roll out to test, then post testing to production. I can add el6 to my copr build if you need an rpm build. Currently I'm only building 1.5-dev22 in copr for

Re: [PATCH 0/3] systemd wrapper improvements

2014-04-17 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi, On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 12:05:25AM +0900, Marc-Antoine Perennou wrote: Hi, On Thursday, April 17, 2014, Apollon Oikonomopoulos apoi...@debian.org wrote: Hi, The following patches improve the systemd wrapper in a couple of ways: - The systemd wrapper itself is now re-executed

Re: [PATCH] FEATURE Extending PROXY protocol for SSL

2014-04-17 Thread Todd Lyons
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote: Note that this probably marks the death of protocol v2 that nobody implemented yet, but that was supposed to be easier to parse... Exim git HEAD has support (for the forthcoming 4.83 release) for Proxy Protocol, when built

Re: [PATCH] FEATURE Extending PROXY protocol for SSL

2014-04-17 Thread David S
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 5:44 PM, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote: (...) We can also decide that we don't implement the extensions in v1 which will motivate adoption for the new v2. (...) What's your opinion ? Willy I prefer to make the extension v2 only, mostly because I don't want to

Re: [PATCH] FEATURE Extending PROXY protocol for SSL

2014-04-17 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi David, On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 01:51:36PM -0400, David S wrote: On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 5:44 PM, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote: (...) We can also decide that we don't implement the extensions in v1 which will motivate adoption for the new v2. (...) What's your opinion ?

cR, Tq, timeout http-request

2014-04-17 Thread Chris Burroughs
We are running 1.4.24 for an application that sees almost entirely small http requests. We have the following timeouts: timeout client 7s timeout server 4s timeout connect 4s timeout http-request 7s There are a significant number of cR/http-408 responses in the

Re: Ubuntu 14.04 package

2014-04-17 Thread pablo platt
I've just installed it with the new ubuntu trusty release. Great timing. Thank you for providing this ppa. On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Vincent Bernat ber...@luffy.cx wrote: ❦ 17 avril 2014 08:59 CEST, Vincent Bernat ber...@luffy.cx : Is there a 1.5~dev22 deb package for Ubuntu 14.04

Re: Ubuntu 14.04 package

2014-04-17 Thread Jorge Severino
Any pkg for openbsd? The most secure unix :-) Imho openbsd+haproxy+carp+ifstated is a excelent choice for solid lb. El 17/04/2014 17:25, pablo platt pablo.pl...@gmail.com escribió: I've just installed it with the new ubuntu trusty release. Great timing. Thank you for providing this ppa.