? (
---
Hi! I want balancing send and receive EDIFACT files. I have servers what send
EDIFACT files and receive request from system what got my files. I try tune
haproxy 1.5.1 in tcp mode. Can you give advice - can I will use for my action
haproxy?
Merci.
Hi,
I'm looking at setting up a haproxy cluster, which is expected to hit
300.000+ active simultaneous connections.
Normally haproxy sends requests to the backend, having exchanged the
source ip, with it's own.
As far as I can gather - that would mean it will run out of ports, when
it hits
On 30/06/2014 07:47, Andrey Zakabluk wrote:
? (
---
Hi! I want balancing send and receive EDIFACT files. I have servers
what send EDIFACT files and receive request from system what got my
files. I try tune haproxy 1.5.1 in tcp mode. Can you give advice -
can I will use
❦ 30 juin 2014 15:54 +0200, Klavs Klavsen k...@vsen.dk :
As far as I can gather - that would mean it will run out of ports, when
it hits about 64k connections being open.
But perhaps ports can be reused, if they are used against different
backends ? (ie. the max open connection amount in
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Vincent Bernat ber...@luffy.cx wrote:
❦ 30 juin 2014 15:54 +0200, Klavs Klavsen k...@vsen.dk :
As far as I can gather - that would mean it will run out of ports, when
it hits about 64k connections being open.
But perhaps ports can be reused, if they are used
Hi folks,
I am writing a simple load balancer as a service to automate haproxy
configuration while providing a simple API to users, who only need to give
a few simple specifications of the load balancer they want.
I am trying to decide whether to run multiple haproxy instances or a single
Thank you for your tips - they are much appreciated.
Baptiste said the following on 06/30/2014 04:34 PM:
[CUT]
You can use transparent proxying.
that way, you can have up to 64K source port per source IP address :)
It should be enough.
That said, it requires you change the XMPP servers'
7 matches
Mail list logo
