On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 11:50:30PM -0400, Dave McCowan wrote:
Hi Willy,
blush Yes, I changed my variable names after testing to clean up and
failed.
Is my obvious corrected patch the correct fix?
Yes I think so.
Or should we clamp down on the use of global chunks being passed downstream?
Hello all,
I'm asked to evaluate possible pitfalls about subj. Can you point me to any
info?
--
With all the respect,
Aleksandr Vinokurov
+7 (921) 982-21-43
@aleksandrvin
Apologies, I had a copy/paste error in the disable server command I
provided at the end. The actual command I'm using is this:
echo disable server nodes/web01 | sudo socat stdio /run/haproxy/admin.sock
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Abe Voelker a...@abevoelker.com wrote:
My use case is
Does anybody know about this error, and how it can be fixed:
I installed the required devel packages and the compilation went fine but i
could see a message at the bottom(skipping incompatible
/usr/lib/libcrypt.so when searching for -lcrypt) .Is it severe or can be
ignored?
gcc -g -o haproxy
Hi Guys,
I am creating a whitelist of subnets allowed to access HAPROXY during
maintenance. Basically I want to redirect everyone to our maintenance page
other than users in the whitelisted file.
Here is my config...
frontend https-in
bind *:443 ssl crt
On 17 Jul 2014 14:50, Abe Voelker a...@abevoelker.com wrote:
So basically I'm wondering if there is a way to expire these
pre-existing sessions or connections or somehow force them to behave like a
new one so that they will queue up in HAProxy?
I believe 1.5 has the on-marked-down
❦ 17 juillet 2014 16:36 +0400, Aleksandr Vinokurov aleksandr@gmail.com :
I'm asked to evaluate possible pitfalls about subj. Can you point me
to any info?
Without a POSIX layer like Cygwin, this is unlikely to work. With
Cygwin, poll() is mapped to select() so you won't be able to handle
On 17 Jul 2014 18:15, JDzialo John jdzi...@edrnet.com wrote:
I am creating a whitelist of subnets allowed to access HAPROXY during
maintenance. Basically I want to redirect everyone to our maintenance page
other than users in the whitelisted file.
This is not working and is forwarding everyone
It was a method I found online without really understanding what
X-Forwarded-For header does.
Traffic does not pass through a reverse proxy before hitting HAProxy. It
should be a direct hit from the client. Is there a header I can compare to our
whitelist to reliably get all incoming
Here is the corrected (and retested) :-) patch.
Commit comment: Use temporary trash chunk, instead of global trash chunk in
make_proxy_line_v2() to avoid memory overwrite.
--Dave
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 4:17 AM, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 11:50:30PM -0400, Dave
Hi Dave,
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 02:34:01PM -0400, Dave McCowan wrote:
Here is the corrected (and retested) :-) patch.
Commit comment: Use temporary trash chunk, instead of global trash chunk in
make_proxy_line_v2() to avoid memory overwrite.
Thank you, I've just applied it now.
Best
This means that you have incompatible (from the point of view of ld)
versions of libcrypt.so and libc.so that would have otherwise been
first preference to resolve the dependencies, but since the
compilation succeeded those apparently were found somewhere else. If
haproxy starts up and is able to
Hi guys,
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 07:26:45PM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
??? 17 juillet 2014 16:36 +0400, Aleksandr Vinokurov
aleksandr@gmail.com :
I'm asked to evaluate possible pitfalls about subj. Can you point me
to any info?
Without a POSIX layer like Cygwin, this is
What minimum version of libcrypt.so and libc.so is required to perfectly
compile haproxy 1.5.2?
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Sasha Pachev sa...@asksasha.com wrote:
This means that you have incompatible (from the point of view of ld)
versions of libcrypt.so and libc.so that would have
Kuldip - haproxy should compile just fine with any reasonably recent
version of libc/libcrypt. I think your problem is that you possibly
have an extra libc.so (in addition to the one that is actually used by
your system) that is for an incompatible architecture or something of
that kind. What kind
15 matches
Mail list logo