I don't see how. The socket is immediately close()'ed when it hits
tcp-request
connection reject, this is as cheap as it gets.
If you're getting attacked, you try to send as few unnecessary packets
as possible, I guess a silent drop could be nice.
Yes, but that can't be done in
Hi,
I don't see how. The socket is immediately close()'ed when it hits
tcp-request
connection reject, this is as cheap as it gets.
If you're getting attacked, you try to send as few unnecessary packets as
possible, I guess a silent drop could be nice.
a) HAProxy (configured with rate
Hello,
Le 15/01/2015 19:30, Lukas Tribus a écrit :
tcp-check is for health checks only. You cannot implement a specific
Layer 7 protocol via configuration.
You can:
- use TCP mode, without touching the TCP payload (without inserting
command above)
- use TCP mode with the PROXY protocol,
Hello,
I am trying to set up a health check service similar to the inetd solutions
suggested in the documentation. Unfortunately, my backends run on different
ports because they are being created dynamically and as far as I can tell I
cannot include the server port in my healthcheck either as
Hi,
I'm converting an older listen configuration to a frontend/backend set
up for SSL...would the following directives be better suited in the
frontend or the backend section?
# Persistently map clients to backends by client IP
stick-table type ip size XX expire YY peers ZZ
stick on src
Morning all …
I’ve been fighting with an issue here, and have run out of ideas …
We have a wordpress site, two webheads behind haproxy … balance leastconn …
in front of haproxy, we are using Incapsula, as CDN/DDoS shield … if I am only
running one webhead, everythign works great,
found it just after I sent this:
balance hdr(X-Forwarded-For)
testing right now, but *looks* like it fixes the issue … *cross fingers*
On Jan 16, 2015, at 9:21 AM, Marc Fournier scra...@hub.org wrote:
Morning all …
I’ve been fighting with an issue here, and have run out of ideas …
We recently switched our web cluster to use HaProxy 1.5.x from a combination
of pound and xrctl. So far, we're loving it!
Some questions have come up, though, that we'd like to entertain:
1) Logging performance data:
A) How long before the page started putting out data? (implying that
For lb i use rsync+vrrp+ifstated.
Atte. Jsd
El 16-01-2015 21:48, Benjamin Smith li...@benjamindsmith.com escribió:
We recently switched our web cluster to use HaProxy 1.5.x from a
combination
of pound and xrctl. So far, we're loving it!
Some questions have come up, though, that we'd like to
We've used spread (spread.org) and wackamole (backhand.org/wackamole) with
great success to do HA clustering. Had a very bad time with pacemaker.
As for repos, I'd recommend compiling from source to stay current - it's a
pretty simple build, not many deps.
Cheers,
Jeff
On Jan 16, 2015 5:47 PM,
220700googlegoogle mapH9EgmtOz83QQ3150058554
18024025957J7e2U0a0eF07
11 matches
Mail list logo
