From: jeffsar...@hotmail.com
To: luky...@hotmail.com
Subject: RE: Retrying a request on other servers
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 21:27:11 -0400
that's Lukas for taking the time to reply.
Too bad unfortunately.
From: luky...@hotmail.com
To: jeffsar...@hotmail.com; haproxy@formilux.org
I setup a duplicate config on my local workstation (our production one
is quite large and not suitable for sharing in its entirety).
Interestingly I can't get an 'SC--' with a NOSRV when doing
tcp-request connection reject.
I'll dig a bit further. Is there any other scenario that might cause
an
Hi,
Would you be interested in acquiring Agile Software Users contact list to
boost your sales effort?
Data Field: Verified Phone Number, Fax Number, Verified Email Address,
Employee Size, Revenue size, SIC Code, Industry Type etc.,
We also provide other related Technology Users like:
Dassault
Hello!
I recently ran into a case where I was hunting down the cause of the
termination of a request looking like the following (IPs changed to
protect the innocent and/or guilty):
Mar 26 23:01:43 localhost haproxy[17207]: 1.2.3.4:19036
[26/Mar/2015:23:01:43.477] http-in http-in/NOSRV
thanks Lukas, I have this working now (at least on my test server).
fyi,
1.5.8 didn't work with either method.
1.5.11 worked with both methods.
thanks for your help.
-Original Message-
From: Lukas Tribus
Sent: Sunday, March 22, 2015 9:27 PM
To: Peter BUtler ; haproxy@formilux.org
I have been experimenting with increasing resilience to backend server
failure in a low latency environment and one thing that keeps coming up is
that connection retries are made against the same server. Typically in our
datacenters when we have connection issues it is because a machine or rack
Hi all,
Le 26/03/2015 22:52, Peter BUtler a écrit :
thanks Lukas, I have this working now (at least on my test server).
fyi,
1.5.8 didn't work with either method.
1.5.11 worked with both methods.
Good news ! This was precisely a patch I provided to sort the
certificates by filename. And
Hi the list!!!
I'll be traveling for business purpose to the SF bay Area, from the 20th
of April to 1st of May. I'll meet some customers and prospects on behalf
of our company, HAProxy Technologies.
So if any of you is available and wants to meet us, either to speak about
the open source
Hi,
Le 26/03/2015 15:16, jeff saremi a écrit :
checking once more to see if anyone has the answer as to why i get two
haproxy processes launched?
what would happen with the second one considering that the first one's
already using the listening sockets?
How can this be fixed?thanks
Please
Hi Joseph,
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 10:59:30AM -0700, Joseph Lynch wrote:
Great! I have attached the patch generated with git format-patch -1
and copied it below, feel free to adjust the commit message.
That's perfect, there's nothing to change, I've applied it as-is
(just fixed your email
Hi Jason,
Le 27/03/2015 01:14, Jason Harvey a écrit :
Hello!
I recently ran into a case where I was hunting down the cause of the
termination of a request looking like the following (IPs changed to
protect the innocent and/or guilty):
Mar 26 23:01:43 localhost haproxy[17207]: 1.2.3.4:19036
Hi Joseph,
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 06:45:29PM -0700, Joseph Lynch wrote:
Willy,
Thank you for the feedback. I believe that the patch attached at the
bottom of this email incorporates your suggestions. Please let me know
any further steps I need to take.
It took me a while to remember this
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 25, Shawn Heisey wrote:
On 3/25/2015 10:16 AM, Brandon wrote:
Hi, I am trying to deploy HAProxy in HTTP mode in front of a Windows
Server 2012 R2 ADFS 3.0 farm. In ADFS 3.0 backend servers require that
clients support SNI.
In my testing it does not appear that HAProxy
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 7:44 AM, Jarno Huuskonen jarno.huusko...@uef.fi wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 25, Shawn Heisey wrote:
On 3/25/2015 10:16 AM, Brandon wrote:
Hi, I am trying to deploy HAProxy in HTTP mode in front of a Windows
Server 2012 R2 ADFS 3.0 farm. In ADFS 3.0 backend servers
checking once more to see if anyone has the answer as to why i get two haproxy
processes launched?
what would happen with the second one considering that the first one's already
using the listening sockets?
How can this be fixed?thanks
From: jeffsar...@hotmail.com
To: haproxy@formilux.org
Title: IKKS
Bienvenue et merci pour votre inscription.Si ce message ne s'affiche pas correctement, visualisez la version en ligne.
MERCI.,
Nous vous
16 matches
Mail list logo