Afficher la version web. (http://trk.mix.uneoffredeouf.com/view/5rs-kwV3.php) |
Me désinscrire. (http://trk.mix.uneoffredeouf.com/usb/5rs-kwV3.php) | Signaler
comme courrier indésirable. (mailto:ab...@dgcnit.fr)
http://trk.mix.uneoffredeouf.com/tk/5rs-kwV3-bPE.php
On 23/04/2015 6:01 PM, i...@linux-web-development.de wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi!
I'm having trouble with one of our HAProxy-Servers that uses a backend
with TLS. When starting HAProxy the backend will report all servers as down:
Server
SSLv3 is not allowed anywhere in our infrastructure, it is disabled
already.
On 2015-04-23 16:09, Baptiste wrote:
maybe the server refuses sslv3...
Can you disable sslv3 on the server side?
Baptiste
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 3:38 PM, i...@linux-web-development.de
wrote:
I've checked again,
Hi All,
I’m playing with the new set-path feature and encountered a bug. I’m using
1.6-dev1 plus all the patches up to Apr 22nd, I think we’re all clear that
set-path was not working at all in 1.6-dev1 itself. It does now work but not in
all situations I’d expect.
My config is below. I do nc
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 10:01:19AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi Simon,
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 02:51:25PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
(...)
This series attempts to address that problem by first disentangling the
state and colour of servers in the first two patches, which are new -
maybe the server refuses sslv3...
Can you disable sslv3 on the server side?
Baptiste
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 3:38 PM, i...@linux-web-development.de wrote:
I've checked again, but the time on those servers is correct..
On 2015-04-23 14:16, Daniel Schneller wrote:
Have you checked the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi!
I'm having trouble with one of our HAProxy-Servers that uses a backend
with TLS. When starting HAProxy the backend will report all servers as
down:
Server web_remote/apache_rem_1 is DOWN, reason: Layer6 invalid
response, info: SSL
Hi Simon,
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 02:51:25PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
(...)
This series attempts to address that problem by first disentangling the
state and colour of servers in the first two patches, which are new -
arguably a worthwhile clean-up in its own right. The remaining two patches
Have you checked the time/date on the Haproxy host?
If they are wrong, the certificate might look bad from HAProxy’s point of view.
Daniel
--
Daniel Schneller
Infrastructure Architect / Developer
CenterDevice GmbH
On 23.04.2015, at 10:00, i...@linux-web-development.de wrote:
-BEGIN
I've checked again, but the time on those servers is correct..
On 2015-04-23 14:16, Daniel Schneller wrote:
Have you checked the time/date on the Haproxy host?
If they are wrong, the certificate might look bad from HAProxy’s
point of view.
Daniel
--
Daniel Schneller
Infrastructure Architect /
10 matches
Mail list logo