Re: Performance considerations for ACL order and type

2016-05-17 Thread Bryan Talbot
> On May 17, 2016, at May 17, 3:32 PM, Sean Decker > wrote: > > I'm wondering if there are any significant performance implications for the > order of our ACLs known without doing multiple rounds of testing. Here is an > example mixing path_beg and path_reg. IMO:

RE: Using socket commands to add a new server to a backend

2016-05-17 Thread Tugberk Ugurlu
Thanks! What do you think about this approach: http://engineeringblog.yelp.com/2015/04/true-zero-downtime-haproxy-reloads.html Seems a bit complicated to get it right but wonder if it's worth investing into. Tugberk > Subject: Re: Using socket commands to add a new server to a backend > To:

Performance considerations for ACL order and type

2016-05-17 Thread Sean Decker
I'm wondering if there are any significant performance implications for the order of our ACLs known without doing multiple rounds of testing. Here is an example mixing path_beg and path_reg. acl url_wcfg path_beg -i /portal /portal/ /reports /reports/ use_backend Portal if url_wcfg

Re: [PATCH] MEDIUM: init: allow directory as argument of -f

2016-05-17 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 11:34:24PM +0200, maxime de Roucy wrote: > I can do it tomorow evening (France time). Fine, thank you Maxime. No rush, don't worry. The most important is that we know what to do and that everyone agrees. Willy

Re: [PATCH] MEDIUM: init: allow directory as argument of -f

2016-05-17 Thread maxime de Roucy
I can do it tomorow evening (France time). Le 17 mai 2016 11:18 PM, "Willy Tarreau" a écrit : > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 11:12:35PM +0200, Nenad Merdanovic wrote: > > Hello Willy, > > > > On 05/17/2016 09:41 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > > Nenad, you were the one reporting the sorting

Re: [PATCH] MEDIUM: init: allow directory as argument of -f

2016-05-17 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 11:12:35PM +0200, Nenad Merdanovic wrote: > Hello Willy, > > On 05/17/2016 09:41 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > Nenad, you were the one reporting the sorting issue, what do you think > > about all this ? > > I don't have strong feelings about this -- the initial point I

Re: [PATCH] MEDIUM: init: allow directory as argument of -f

2016-05-17 Thread Nenad Merdanovic
Hello Willy, On 05/17/2016 09:41 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote: > Nenad, you were the one reporting the sorting issue, what do you think > about all this ? I don't have strong feelings about this -- the initial point I asked about was the versionsort vs alphasort and then just pointing out that we've

Re: [PATCH] MEDIUM: init: allow directory as argument of -f

2016-05-17 Thread Maxime de Roucy
Le mardi 17 mai 2016 à 21:28 +0200, Cyril Bonté a écrit : > Well, I'd rather think we shouldn't bother with setlocale(), stay > with the C locale, and document how the files are sorted. The > behaviour is different than calling "haproxy -- *.cfg", where globing > is made by the shell itself and

Re: [PATCH] MEDIUM: init: allow directory as argument of -f

2016-05-17 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 09:28:21PM +0200, Cyril Bonté wrote: > Le 17/05/2016 20:01, Willy Tarreau a écrit : > > At least we now need to find a way to fix this because we can't accept > > to have such random breakage in a way that it all but auditable. When > > you host 1000 customers and 50 of

Re: [PATCH] MEDIUM: init: allow directory as argument of -f

2016-05-17 Thread Cyril Bonté
Le 17/05/2016 20:01, Willy Tarreau a écrit : At least we now need to find a way to fix this because we can't accept to have such random breakage in a way that it all but auditable. When you host 1000 customers and 50 of them start to report random breakage after an upgrade, you can only

Re: [PATCH] MEDIUM: init: allow directory as argument of -f

2016-05-17 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi Cyril, On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 07:55:01PM +0200, Cyril Bonté wrote: > Hi all, > > Le 14/05/2016 00:13, Willy Tarreau a écrit : > > Hi Maxime, > > > > On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 12:09:07AM +0200, Maxime de Roucy wrote: > > > Hello Willy, > > > > > > Le vendredi 13 mai 2016 à 19:22 +0200, Willy

Re: [PATCH] MEDIUM: init: allow directory as argument of -f

2016-05-17 Thread Cyril Bonté
Hi all, Le 14/05/2016 00:13, Willy Tarreau a écrit : Hi Maxime, On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 12:09:07AM +0200, Maxime de Roucy wrote: Hello Willy, Le vendredi 13 mai 2016 à 19:22 +0200, Willy Tarreau a écrit : Maxime, could you please add a call to setlocale(LC_ALL, "") as suggested by Nenad

E-commercants : revolutionnez la gestion de vos envois avec Upela

2016-05-17 Thread Upela
Module de transport gratuit pour Prestashop, Amazon, Ebay, Magento | Voir la version en ligne Upela Expédiez vos plis, colis, palettes dans le monde entier Upela connecte les meilleurs transporteurs directement à votre plateforme e-commerce Centralisez toutes vos expéditions

RE: HAproxy and ftp_put response "504 Timeout"

2016-05-17 Thread Info (ITpartner.ee)
Hello everyone, Finally fixed an issue. Indeed it wasn't related to FirewallD or HAproxy. The issue was in php code, for some reason I had to change position of ftp_passv ( move it after ftp_login) // Juri -Original Message- From: Björn Zettergren

Re: Using socket commands to add a new server to a backend

2016-05-17 Thread Conrad Hoffmann
On 05/17/2016 12:53 PM, Tugberk Ugurlu wrote: > Thanks for getting back! > Is there a place that I can influence this change or do you think that this > is something not possible cuz of some internal architectural concerns or > similar? I am trying to mimic the AWS ELB's register and deregister

RE: Using socket commands to add a new server to a backend

2016-05-17 Thread Tugberk Ugurlu
Thanks for getting back! Is there a place that I can influence this change or do you think that this is something not possible cuz of some internal architectural concerns or similar? I am trying to mimic the AWS ELB's register and deregister features. BTW, is HAProxy open source? If so, is it on

Re: Using socket commands to add a new server to a backend

2016-05-17 Thread Conrad Hoffmann
Hi Tugberk, On 05/16/2016 05:25 PM, Tugberk Ugurlu wrote: > Hi, > Is it possible to register a new server under a backend? This is similar to > what is being asked here: > http://haproxy.formilux.narkive.com/1OibZABp/using-haproxy-socket-to-add-new-servers > I cannot see the command available

⚡ VENTES FLASH ⚡ Plus que 48h pour réserver

2016-05-17 Thread Wonder Weekend
Bien plus qu'un weekend ! A

RE: HAproxy and ftp_put response "504 Timeout"

2016-05-17 Thread Info (ITpartner.ee)
Hi! I have already tried the simplest php ftp upload script, that works fine on other hosting. Script example: // FTP access $ftp_server = 'HOSTNAME'; $ftp_username = 'USERNAME'; $ftp_password = 'PASSWORD'; // setup of connection $conn_id = ftp_connect($ftp_server) or die("could not connect