Re: HAProxy doesn't respect the `hold valid 1s` setting

Can any help to fix this bug? I reported here long time ago. On 14 August 2016 at 15:06, Tao Wang wrote: > Hi, > > As the issue reported on Github haproxy repo are disabled, I transfer > the issue here. > > I created a Github repo for this issue, >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] haproxy-1.7-dev6

Hi Willy. Thank you as always for the detailed answer. Am 10-11-2016 06:51, schrieb Willy Tarreau: Hi Aleks, On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 12:52:22AM +0100, Aleksandar Lazic wrote: > http://www.haproxy.org/download/1.7/doc/SPOE.txt I have read the doc. very interesting. When I understand

Re: problem building haproxy 1.6.9 on ar71xx

Hi Thomas, Am 10.11.2016 um 22:20 schrieb Thomas Heil: Also see: https://www.openssl.org/docs/man1.1.0/crypto/ERR_remove_state.html hmm. did i read correctly, that this function does nothing? It does nothing in openssl 1.1.0, as it isn't required in that branch. However it is required

Re: problem building haproxy 1.6.9 on ar71xx

Hey, On 10.11.2016 19:13, Lukas Tribus wrote: > Hi, > > > Am 10.11.2016 um 18:27 schrieb Thomas Heil: >> Hi, >> >> Iam facing a problem when building haproxy 1.6.9 with ssl for mips_24kc >> with musl 1.1.15. >> Openssl was building fine, but the function "ERR_remove_state(0)" does >> not exist

Re: Haproxy subdomain going to wrong backend

> On Nov 9, 2016, at Nov 9, 4:45 AM, Azam Mohammed wrote: > > Also we have exact same Haproxy config on QA and UAT environment and works > fine. > > QA Environment: > Haproxy Version: HA-Proxy version 1.5.4 > OS Version: CentOS release 6.3 (Final) > > UAT Environment: >

Re: Haproxy subdomain going to wrong backend

… please include the list in your responses too > On Nov 10, 2016, at Nov 10, 4:09 AM, Azam Mohammed wrote: > > Hi Bryan, > > Thanks for your reply. > > Putting "use_backend test" first in Haproxy config worked fine. > > But I have few more question based on the solution.

Re: problem building haproxy 1.6.9 on ar71xx

Hi, Am 10.11.2016 um 18:27 schrieb Thomas Heil: Hi, Iam facing a problem when building haproxy 1.6.9 with ssl for mips_24kc with musl 1.1.15. Openssl was building fine, but the function "ERR_remove_state(0)" does not exist but ERR_remove_thread_state(0); is available. So does anybody know

Re: Getting JSON encoded data from the stats socket.

Hi, On 16-11-10 16:56:33, Willy Tarreau wrote: > I removed you from the To in this response, but just as a hint we > generally recommend to keep people CCed since most of us subscribed > to lists have filters to automatically place them in the right box, > and some people may participate without

Re: Getting JSON encoded data from the stats socket.

On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 04:30:57PM +0100, ge...@riseup.net wrote: > (Please don't Cc: me, I'm subscribed to the list.) I removed you from the To in this response, but just as a hint we generally recommend to keep people CCed since most of us subscribed to lists have filters to automatically place

Re: Getting JSON encoded data from the stats socket.

Hi Simon! On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 04:27:15PM +0100, Simon Horman wrote: > My preference is to take things calmly as TBH I am only just getting > started on this and I think the schema could take a little time to get > a consensus on. I totally agree with you. I think the most difficult thing is

Re: Getting JSON encoded data from the stats socket.

(Please don't Cc: me, I'm subscribed to the list.) On 16-11-10 16:12:31, Willy Tarreau wrote: > That's cool! > > The only thing is that I don't want to delay the release only for this, > and at the same time I'm pretty sure it's possible to do something which > will not impact existing code

Re: Getting JSON encoded data from the stats socket.

On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 04:12:31PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: > Hi Malcolm, > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 12:53:13PM +, Malcolm Turnbull wrote: > > Georg, > > > > That's a timely reminder thanks: > > I just had another chat with Simon Horman who has kindly offered to > > take a look at this

Re: Getting JSON encoded data from the stats socket.

Hi Malcolm, On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 12:53:13PM +, Malcolm Turnbull wrote: > Georg, > > That's a timely reminder thanks: > I just had another chat with Simon Horman who has kindly offered to > take a look at this again. That's cool! The only thing is that I don't want to delay the release

Re: Getting JSON encoded data from the stats socket.

On Thu, 10 Nov 2016, at 13:53, Malcolm Turnbull wrote: > Georg, > > That's a timely reminder thanks: > I just had another chat with Simon Horman who has kindly offered to > take a look at this again. Sounds great! I'm very interested in logging this continually via chrooted unix socket, into

Re: Getting JSON encoded data from the stats socket.

Georg, That's a timely reminder thanks: I just had another chat with Simon Horman who has kindly offered to take a look at this again. On 10 November 2016 at 10:54, ge...@riseup.net wrote: > Hi all, > > On 16-07-05 10:05:13, Mark Brookes wrote: >> I wondered if we could

Re: HAProxy 1.5 vs 1.6

Am 10.11.16 um 10:24 schrieb Pavlos Parissis: > On 09/11/2016 09:20 μμ, Steven Le Roux wrote: >> Hi a first good coverage for a comparison between 1.5 and 1.6 would be >> http://blog.haproxy.com/2015/10/14/whats-new-in-haproxy-1-6/ >> >> 1.6 is perfectly considered stable and hasn't seen any

Re: Getting JSON encoded data from the stats socket.

Hi all, On 16-07-05 10:05:13, Mark Brookes wrote: > I wondered if we could start a discussion about the possibility of > having the stats socket return stats data in JSON format. After the discussion we had in July, I'm wondering what's the current status regarding this topic? Thanks and all

Re: Herald - Generic and extensible agent-check service for Haproxy

Hello Raghu, On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 01:30:05PM +0530, Raghu Udiyar wrote: > Hello > > We have developed a generic service (using python gevent) to serve as an > agent check service for Haproxy. Its extensible via plugins for application > feedback, and supports result cacheing, json

Re: HAProxy 1.5 vs 1.6

On 09/11/2016 09:20 μμ, Steven Le Roux wrote: > Hi a first good coverage for a comparison between 1.5 and 1.6 would be > http://blog.haproxy.com/2015/10/14/whats-new-in-haproxy-1-6/ > > 1.6 is perfectly considered stable and hasn't seen any maintenance > release for more than 2 months. It's being

Herald - Generic and extensible agent-check service for Haproxy

Hello We have developed a generic service (using python gevent) to serve as an agent check service for Haproxy. Its extensible via plugins for application feedback, and supports result cacheing, json expressions, arithmetic, regex match, and fallback in case of failure. The source is here :