Hi, I hope you are well. I represent an experienced video production and
marketing company that has produced over 800 episodes and 1000 Promotional
videos. Plus we can actually help promote your company to the world as we
have broadcast partners locally, internationally and online with stunning
Vie
On 17/03/2017 05:57 μμ, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
> Willy.
>
> Am 14-03-2017 22:17, schrieb Willy Tarreau:
>> Matthias,
>>
>> I could finally track the problem down to a 5-year old bug in the
>> connection handler. It already used to affect Unix sockets but it
>> requires so rare a set of options an
Hi Aleks,
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 05:57:02PM +0100, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
> I love your commit massages ;-).
>
> They are very detailed and sometimes bigger the the code change.
That's expected, especially on a bug. The code is the result of a
long analysis. If this analysis is lost, next time
Le 16 mars 2017 à 17:49, Emmanuel Hocdet a écrit :Hi Emeric,Le 16 mars 2017 à 14:44, Emeric Brun a écrit :I'm clearly not sure that setting openssl's options to ~no-tlsxx have the same behavior than forcing the callback sets (using force-) to one protocol.I alwa
Hi.
The subject looks strange so let me the explain the setup a little bit.
I have a old rsyslog without ssl module.
I need to send syslog messages via tcp to a remote syslog server.
Between the local server and the remote server is a haproxy which I can
only use as https-sni-forwarder.
http
Willy.
Am 14-03-2017 22:17, schrieb Willy Tarreau:
Matthias,
I could finally track the problem down to a 5-year old bug in the
connection handler. It already used to affect Unix sockets but it
requires so rare a set of options and even then its occurrence rate
is so low that probably nobody not
Dear Willy and Dmitry,
Am 14.03.17 um 22:17 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
Or you may prefer to wait for 1.7.4. It's not planned yet given that
there are other fixes in the wild waiting for some feedback though.
Thanks guys for the detailed feedback, it's now time to turn the page
and switch to less di
Hi!
I upgraded a HAProxy instance from v1.6.10 to v1.7.3 with no changes to
configuration and I noticed that now clients connecting to a WebSocket backend
are getting disconnected after being idle for "timeout client" time rather than
the much longer "timeout tunnel" time. As I understand it,
> On 17 Mar 2017, at 12:04, Willy Tarreau wrote:
>
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 12:45:54AM +0300, Dmitry Sivachenko wrote:
>> I committed your patch to FreeBSD ports.
>
> I was just reported an undesired side effect of this patch with smtp
> in clear without proxy-proto :-(
>
> [.
Hi Dmitry,
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 12:45:54AM +0300, Dmitry Sivachenko wrote:
> I committed your patch to FreeBSD ports.
I was just reported an undesired side effect of this patch with smtp
in clear without proxy-proto :-(
The problem is that we're using the CONNECTED flag to indicate whether
we
Hello, Ryan!
I also propose a different approach... just in case.
I had the same problem with some further constraints.
The Java client runs on Windows and an haproxy instance running on
another server was very difficult to setup complying to all the security
policies.
In this case it was mu
11 matches
Mail list logo