Hi Jarno,
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 07:18:48AM +0300, Jarno Huuskonen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Mar 25, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
> > how about to try this, it's untested.
> >
> > http-request set-var(req.mysticky)
> > url_param(email),url_param(newsletter_id)
> > stick on req.mysticky table
HI Emeric,
Thanks for your response, responses inline
>
> On Mar 29, 2017, at 04:31, Emeric Brun wrote:
>
> Hi Aaron,
>
> On 03/28/2017 10:03 PM, Aaron van Meerten wrote:
>> Hi HAProxy List,
>> [snip]
>>>
>>> I’ve got a fleet of 10 proxy servers peering with each other,
Le 29/03/2017 à 13:23, Cyril Bonté a écrit :
De: "Cyril Bonté"
À: nos...@mrietzler.de
Cc: haproxy@formilux.org
Envoyé: Mercredi 29 Mars 2017 12:36:01
Objet: Re: 100% cpu usage with compression in haproxy.cfg
Hi all,
De: nos...@mrietzler.de
À: haproxy@formilux.org
Envoyé:
Hi Manu,
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 06:10:13PM +0200, Emmanuel Hocdet wrote:
> Hi Willy,
>
> > Le 27 mars 2017 à 17:54, Willy Tarreau a écrit :
> >
> > Hi Manu,
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 05:46:46PM +0200, Emmanuel Hocdet wrote:
> >>> I'm not much comfortable with the "sslv3"
Hi Willy,
> Le 27 mars 2017 à 17:54, Willy Tarreau a écrit :
>
> Hi Manu,
>
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 05:46:46PM +0200, Emmanuel Hocdet wrote:
>>> I'm not much comfortable with the "sslv3" and so on as they easily read
>>> as "use sslv3 only" (for me at least) but we can get rid
Use boringssl SSL_CTX_set_ocsp_response to set OCSP response from file with'.ocsp' extension. CLI update is not supported.
0001-MINOR-boringssl-basic-support-for-OCSP-Stapling.patch
Description: Binary data
On 03/29/2017 02:35 PM, Frederic Lecaille wrote:
Hello Willy,
As I began to work on server template feature, I found a bug in patch
#0019 (due to a copy and paste again).
Here is a new patch.
Sorry for this one.
Fred
Here is a patch which fixes this bug, to be merged with current haproxy
Hello Willy,
As I began to work on server template feature, I found a bug in patch
#0019 (due to a copy and paste again).
Here is a new patch.
Sorry for this one.
Fred
>From 9da661d95b42cac3c65be783b4c8c71e900366e6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From:
[...] *snip*
> Currently I'm using haproxy mostly as an SNI reverse proxy.
>
> I'm using 1.6.2-6
>
> Would it be recommended to upgrade to 1.7?
I cannot comment specifically on SNI but I remember reading this from
Willy...
https://www.mail-archive.com/haproxy@formilux.org/msg24244.html
Hi,
Currently I'm using haproxy mostly as an SNI reverse proxy.
I'm using 1.6.2-6
Would it be recommended to upgrade to 1.7?
thanks in advance for your answers
> De: "Cyril Bonté"
> À: nos...@mrietzler.de
> Cc: haproxy@formilux.org
> Envoyé: Mercredi 29 Mars 2017 12:36:01
> Objet: Re: 100% cpu usage with compression in haproxy.cfg
> Hi all,
>
> > De: nos...@mrietzler.de
> > À: haproxy@formilux.org
> > Envoyé: Mercredi 29 Mars 2017
In a haproxy with ssl-nsi (not terminate ssl).
I want to check state of VM witch are under other haproxy, so I need
"option httpchk GET /healthcheck"
(https://www.mail-archive.com/haproxy@formilux.org/msg24823.html)).
or
"option httpchk GET /testwebwls/check"
Hi all,
> De: nos...@mrietzler.de
> À: haproxy@formilux.org
> Envoyé: Mercredi 29 Mars 2017 11:52:10
> Objet: 100% cpu usage with compression in haproxy.cfg
>
> i have upgraded to haproxy 1.7.4
>
> when i add the compression algo & type configs in frontend, haproxy
> raises up to 100%.
> this
i have upgraded to haproxy 1.7.4
when i add the compression algo & type configs in frontend, haproxy raises up
to 100%.
this happens also with 1.7.1.
when i comment those two lines out, everything is working like a charm, even
compression is working. so i expect i don't need this config
Hi Aaron,
On 03/28/2017 10:03 PM, Aaron van Meerten wrote:
> Hi HAProxy List,
>
> I posted the following approximately 2 weeks ago and was hoping that someone
> else might have experienced these inconsistencies within the stick tables
> between peers. It seems to be an issue even in the
15 matches
Mail list logo