Re: Help you generate more revenue for your haproxy.com.

On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 10:14:55PM +1000, Rob Thomas wrote: > You gotta wonder how this guy got this mailing list. He must have actually > LOOKED at the website, right? > > Sigh. Spammers. > > For anyone who cares, I don't think it's possible for haproxy to get MORE > exposure on google. > >

Help you generate more revenue for your haproxy.com.

Hi *haproxy.com ,* *Do you need to know how your website currently ranks on search engine result pages and how you can start beating your competitors right now?* Today, I went through your website *haproxy.com *; you seem to have a great website, but only

Re: ppa1~xenial with TLS v1.3 support

Hello, On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 at 11:31, Haim Ari wrote: > > Hello, > > Is there a way to add TLS v1.3 without compiling haproxy ? (and still use PPA > version for Ubuntu) No. TLSv1.3 requires OpenSSL 1.1.1, which is still in beta phase, and even if it becomes stable, it will require some time

Re: BUG/MEDIUM: incompatibility between DNS SRV records and server-state

On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 11:21:08AM +0200, Baptiste wrote: > I did not see the patch in 1.8 (I sent a specific one in my mail). It's expected, we usually run into some backporting sessions taking a whole day instead of doing them one at a time in random order. It helps us maintain the ordering

ppa1~xenial with TLS v1.3 support

Hello, Is there a way to add TLS v1.3 without compiling haproxy ? (and still use PPA version for Ubuntu) I noticed there is "OpenSSL extensions support" Thank you, HA-Proxy version 1.8.13-1ppa1~xenial 2018/08/01 Copyright 2000-2018 Willy Tarreau Build options : TARGET = linux2628 CPU

BUG/MINOR: fix server's resolver checking at configuration validation step

Hi there, In attachment, a patch to fix a bug reported by Marcos on the ML during the summer. The bug is that "haproxy -c -f cfgfile" don't check for if a server's resolver section exist, despite "haproxy -f cfgfile" does it. The issue, is that init scripts are not able to detect a mis

Re: BUG/MEDIUM: incompatibility between DNS SRV records and server-state

On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 5:46 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote: > On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 10:02:09AM +0200, Baptiste wrote: > > This patch improve the server-state file to fix this issue: the srv > record > > used to manage this server is now saved by the previous process and > changes > > can be