вс, 29 мар. 2020 г. в 23:41, William Lallemand :
> On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 09:18:54PM +0500, Илья Шипицин wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
>
> Hello Ilya,
>
> > while writing some doc "how to link custom openssl lib" (it is useful,
> for
> > example, for pfSense users),
> >
> > I noticed that currently "-L$S
Willy, I never saw any response to this - and don't think any of my responses
to you ever showed up on the mailing list archive either.
Trying to respond from a different address to see if there maybe is some sort
of block/rejection.
Can you confirm you received this?
-- Nathan
--
On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 09:18:54PM +0500, Илья Шипицин wrote:
> Hello,
>
Hello Ilya,
> while writing some doc "how to link custom openssl lib" (it is useful, for
> example, for pfSense users),
>
> I noticed that currently "-L$SSL_LIB" is specified both in .travis.yml and
> Makefile.
> no need to
Hello,
while writing some doc "how to link custom openssl lib" (it is useful, for
example, for pfSense users),
I noticed that currently "-L$SSL_LIB" is specified both in .travis.yml and
Makefile.
no need to keep in .travis.yml, I'll send a patch.
On other hand, "-Wl,-rpath,$SSL_LIB" is only spec
I wondered what algorithm is used for the "source" load balancing option?
The reason for the question is due to wanting to load balance a service
that uses both TCP and UDP traffic... where the TCP and UDP must go to the
same back-end.
For TCP we are currently using HAproxy and simply drop the UD
5 matches
Mail list logo