On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 09:48:16AM +0500, ??? wrote:
> Hello,
>
> that patch was not applied?
Ah crap, sorry! At home I'm working on several machines and forgot to
push from the one I applied it on. Now done.
Willy
Hello,
that patch was not applied?
пт, 3 апр. 2020 г. в 17:18, Willy Tarreau :
> On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 11:46:58PM +0500, ??? wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > this PR cleans up SSL linking.
> > it is very well aligned to "how to link to custom openssl" documentation.
>
> It's indeed cleaner,
Hi.
On 03.04.20 09:16, Dario Di Pasquale wrote:
Hi! I write on behalf of Immobiliare.it, an Italian company leader in the real
estate services and advertising market, we are using almost exclusively HAProxy
for our load-balancing. In particular, we are using a patched version of HAProxy
to
It seems to also fail on cold start when there's a `peers` block that is
unused. It's very mysterious!
We aren't actually using the peers for anything in this config any more, so
I'm going to strip it out for now and proceed with testing 2.0.14.
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 1:56 PM Willy Tarreau
On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 01:50:56PM -0700, James Brown wrote:
> I actually messed up testing last week; reverting Tim's commit appears to
> fix it.
OK that's very useful, thanks! However you didn't respond to my other
question:
> > > James, just to confirm, does it fail to start from a cold start
I actually messed up testing last week; reverting Tim's commit appears to
fix it.
On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 5:41 AM Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 02:27:05PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 12:32:32PM -0700, James Brown wrote:
> > > I reverted that commit,
Ahh, thank you. I was expecting it to come through as the newer version
rather than a backport.
Sean
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 10:25 AM Lukas Tribus wrote:
> Hello Sean,
>
> On Mon, 6 Apr 2020 at 18:12, Sean Reifschneider wrote:
> >
> > Been kind of watching for the haproxy versions to update
Hi Baptiste,
Op 6-4-2020 om 11:43 schreef Baptiste:
Hi Piba,
my answers inline.
Using 2.2-dev5-c3500c3, I've got both a server and a
servertemplate/server that are marked 'down' due to dns not replying
with (enough) records. That by itself is alright.. (and likely has
been
Hello Sean,
On Mon, 6 Apr 2020 at 18:12, Sean Reifschneider wrote:
>
> Been kind of watching for the haproxy versions to update in the PPAs for
> Ubuntu. Considering the security nature of them, I'm kind of chomping at the
> bit... :-) Any chance of those getting updated soonish? I can
Been kind of watching for the haproxy versions to update in the PPAs for
Ubuntu. Considering the security nature of them, I'm kind of chomping at
the bit... :-) Any chance of those getting updated soonish? I can build
my own if there's a delay, but I should be able to build them here.
Thanks,
Hi Piba,
my answers inline.
Using 2.2-dev5-c3500c3, I've got both a server and a
> servertemplate/server that are marked 'down' due to dns not replying
> with (enough) records. That by itself is alright.. (and likely has been
> like that for a while so i don't think its a regression.)
>
You're
11 matches
Mail list logo
