Re: [PATCH] MINOR: doc: ssl: req_ssl_sni needs implicit TLS

2020-07-18 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Sun, Jul 19, 2020 at 12:25:06AM +0200, Lukas Tribus wrote: > req_ssl_sni is not compatible with protocols negotiating TLS > explicitly, like SMTP on port 25 or 587 and IMAP on port 143. > > Fix an example referring to 587 (SMTPS port with implicit TLS > is 465) and amend the req_ssl_sni

[SPAM] Great News! You were chosen…

2020-07-18 Thread Emily Baudin
 Hey ,  It's not hard to get revenue if you know what you're doing.  There are people who make thousands of dollars online  without lifting a single finger.    How?  Click this link and setup your account

[PATCH] MINOR: doc: ssl: req_ssl_sni needs implicit TLS

2020-07-18 Thread Lukas Tribus
req_ssl_sni is not compatible with protocols negotiating TLS explicitly, like SMTP on port 25 or 587 and IMAP on port 143. Fix an example referring to 587 (SMTPS port with implicit TLS is 465) and amend the req_ssl_sni documentation. This doc fix should be backported to supported versions. ---

Re: [ANNOUNCE] haproxy-2.0.16

2020-07-18 Thread Jerome Magnin
Hi Dmitry On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 12:29:10PM +0300, Dmitry Sivachenko wrote: > > 1) new warnings: > > src/log.c:1692:10: warning: logical not is only applied to the left hand side > of this comparison [-Wlogical-not-parentheses] > while (HA_SPIN_TRYLOCK(LOGSRV_LOCK, >lock) !=

Re: [ANNOUNCE] haproxy-2.0.16

2020-07-18 Thread Dmitry Sivachenko
> On 18 Jul 2020, at 12:40, Илья Шипицин wrote: > > What is freebsd version? > It was 13.0-CURRENT, but after you asked I also tried 12.1-STABLE (clang version is also 10.0.0): the same warnings/error.

Re: Segfault on 2.2.0 and UUID fetch regression

2020-07-18 Thread Luke Seelenbinder
Good thoughts, Tim. I've created two Github issue: - https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/issues/762 (segfault) - https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/issues/763 (uuid config issue) Best, Luke — Luke

Re: [ANNOUNCE] haproxy-2.0.16

2020-07-18 Thread Илья Шипицин
What is freebsd version? On Sat, Jul 18, 2020, 2:32 PM Dmitry Sivachenko wrote: > > > > On 17 Jul 2020, at 17:34, Christopher Faulet > wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > HAProxy 2.0.16 was released on 2020/07/17. It added 45 new commits after > version > > 2.0.15. > > Hello, > > Here are new

Re: [ANNOUNCE] haproxy-2.0.16

2020-07-18 Thread Dmitry Sivachenko
> On 17 Jul 2020, at 17:34, Christopher Faulet wrote: > > > Hi, > > HAProxy 2.0.16 was released on 2020/07/17. It added 45 new commits after > version > 2.0.15. Hello, Here are new compile problems since 2.0.14 (FreeBSD/amd64, clang version 10.0.0) 1) new warnings: src/log.c:1692:10:

Re: Load testing HAProxy 2.2 on x86_64 and aarch64 VMs

2020-07-18 Thread Илья Шипицин
Hello, Martin! Can you please compare load profiles using google perftools ? I never tried to use gperf on ARM64, also, my trial at Linaro is over, I do not have an access to any ARM64 anymore. in short, gperf can be found https://github.com/gperftools/gperftools please follow "CPU profiling