Re: [PATCH] enable coverity daily scan again

2020-12-23 Thread Илья Шипицин
чт, 24 дек. 2020 г. в 07:53, Илья Шипицин : > > > чт, 24 дек. 2020 г. в 01:51, Tim Düsterhus : > >> Ilya, >> >> Am 23.12.20 um 21:21 schrieb Илья Шипицин: >> > this adds daily job. >> > token specification also must be done, let us do it after merge. >> >> I've cleaned up the YML and commit

Re: [PATCH] enable coverity daily scan again

2020-12-23 Thread Илья Шипицин
чт, 24 дек. 2020 г. в 01:51, Tim Düsterhus : > Ilya, > > Am 23.12.20 um 21:21 schrieb Илья Шипицин: > > this adds daily job. > > token specification also must be done, let us do it after merge. > > I've cleaned up the YML and commit message a bit: > > a) Fixed some typos. > b) Improved the naming

Re: haproxy hiding url/minio

2020-12-23 Thread Jonathan Opperman
Hi Chad, On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 2:46 PM Jonathan Opperman wrote: > Hi Chad, > > On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 2:04 PM Chad Lavoie wrote: > >> Greetings, >> >> On 12/23/2020 7:10 PM, Jonathan Opperman wrote: >> > >> > Works perfectly fine, what is the best way to hide /minio so it will >> > rather

Re: haproxy hiding url/minio

2020-12-23 Thread Jonathan Opperman
Hi Chad, On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 2:04 PM Chad Lavoie wrote: > Greetings, > > On 12/23/2020 7:10 PM, Jonathan Opperman wrote: > > > > Works perfectly fine, what is the best way to hide /minio so it will > > rather say /storage so externally > > I hide the fact that we are using minio? > > You

Re: haproxy hiding url/minio

2020-12-23 Thread Chad Lavoie
Greetings, On 12/23/2020 7:10 PM, Jonathan Opperman wrote: Works perfectly fine, what is the best way to hide /minio so it will rather say /storage so externally I hide the fact that we are using minio? You can do that by using 'http-request set-path %[regsub(^/storage,/minio)]' to

haproxy hiding url/minio

2020-12-23 Thread Jonathan Opperman
Hi All, Wanted to get some advice if this is even possible? Want to route https://www.portal.example/minio to a minio instance in the backend. Running haproxy 1.8 configured an acl acl PATH_minio path_beg -i /minio then using backend: use_backend bk_minio_portal if portal PATH_minio backend

Re: [PATCH] enable coverity daily scan again

2020-12-23 Thread Tim Düsterhus
Ilya, Am 23.12.20 um 21:21 schrieb Илья Шипицин: > this adds daily job. > token specification also must be done, let us do it after merge. I've cleaned up the YML and commit message a bit: a) Fixed some typos. b) Improved the naming of the Workflow and the workflow steps. c) Add newlines to

[PATCH] enable coverity daily scan again

2020-12-23 Thread Илья Шипицин
Hello, this adds daily job. token specification also must be done, let us do it after merge. Ilya From 6f52831ee614a334ac5b8ab2c2b29d5e51a681d2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ilya Shipitsin Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2020 01:18:04 +0500 Subject: [PATCH] CI: Github ACtions: enable daily Coverity scan

Wording in home page

2020-12-23 Thread Julien Pivotto
Dear list, on http://www.haproxy.org/ : > We always support at least two active versions in parallel and an extra > old one in critical fixes mode only. The currently supported versions > are : Then, all releases to 1.5 are listed. I think we don't support 1.5 anymore :) Could someone fix the

Re: [*EXT*] Re: Quick question on atomics on ARM

2020-12-23 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 03:12:38PM +0100, Ionel GARDAIS wrote: > My bad, I wasn't up to date. No worries, a devel version is never up to date by definition! > Olivier's fix is OK : no more CPU hogging. Perfect, thanks for the quick test! Willy

Re: [*EXT*] Re: Quick question on atomics on ARM

2020-12-23 Thread Ionel GARDAIS
My bad, I wasn't up to date. Olivier's fix is OK : no more CPU hogging. -- Ionel - Mail original - De: "Willy Tarreau" À: "Ionel GARDAIS" Cc: "David CARLIER" , "haproxy" Envoyé: Mercredi 23 Décembre 2020 14:52:32 Objet: Re: [*EXT*] Re: Quick question on atomics on ARM On Wed, Dec

Re: [*EXT*] Re: Quick question on atomics on ARM

2020-12-23 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 02:48:17PM +0100, Ionel GARDAIS wrote: > For what it's worth, I tried to build haproxy on Apple M1. > It builds OK but at run, it's stuck in the initial pool_flush, hogging 100% > CPU. > > the assembly part of __ha_cas_dw for __aarch64__ seems to be ignored. What version

Re: [*EXT*] Re: Quick question on atomics on ARM

2020-12-23 Thread Ionel GARDAIS
For what it's worth, I tried to build haproxy on Apple M1. It builds OK but at run, it's stuck in the initial pool_flush, hogging 100% CPU. the assembly part of __ha_cas_dw for __aarch64__ seems to be ignored. -- Ionel - Mail original - De: "Willy Tarreau" À: "David CARLIER" Cc: