Re: Should we change the -c output?

2023-11-13 Thread John Lauro
I like the default message. If you want to suppress it, then you can use -q. Having some standard output that can be suppressed with -q is also fairly standard for UNIX commands. On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 4:07 AM William Lallemand wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 09:52:57AM +0100, Baptiste

Re: Can't display the certificate: Not found or the certificate is a bundle!

2023-11-13 Thread William Lallemand
On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 10:46:08AM +0100, Christoph Kukulies wrote: > > Am 13.11.2023 um 10:09 schrieb William Lallemand : > >> > >> acme@mail:~$ echo "show ssl cert /etc/haproxy/certs/mydomain.org.pem" | > >> socat /var/run/haproxy/admin.sock - > >> Can't display the certificate: Not found or

Re: Can't display the certificate: Not found or the certificate is a bundle!

2023-11-13 Thread Shawn Heisey
On 11/13/23 02:09, William Lallemand wrote: "show ssl cert" shows the certificate in the haproxy memory, and not on the filesystem. Start by doing "show ssl cert" without any argument to see the list of certificates whcih were loaded by haproxy. That makes complete sense now! I saw an error

Re: Can't display the certificate: Not found or the certificate is a bundle!

2023-11-13 Thread Christoph Kukulies
> Am 13.11.2023 um 10:09 schrieb William Lallemand : > > On Sat, Nov 11, 2023 at 10:26:33AM +0100, Christoph Kukulies wrote: >> I'm using haproxy2.8 and I have configured the acme.sh challenge to fetch >> the certificate, following this wiki here: >>

Re: Can't display the certificate: Not found or the certificate is a bundle!

2023-11-13 Thread William Lallemand
On Sat, Nov 11, 2023 at 10:26:33AM +0100, Christoph Kukulies wrote: > I'm using haproxy2.8 and I have configured the acme.sh challenge to fetch > the certificate, following this wiki here: > https://github.com/haproxy/wiki/wiki/Letsencrypt-integration-with-HAProxy-and-acme.sh > > Once I get to

Re: Should we change the -c output?

2023-11-13 Thread William Lallemand
On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 09:52:57AM +0100, Baptiste wrote: > On Thu, Nov 9, 2023 at 5:00 PM William Lallemand > wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > haproxy -c seems to be too verbose in the systemd logs by > > showing "Configuration file is valid" for every reloads. > > > > Is there anyone against

Re: Should we change the -c output?

2023-11-13 Thread Baptiste
On Thu, Nov 9, 2023 at 5:00 PM William Lallemand wrote: > Hello, > > haproxy -c seems to be too verbose in the systemd logs by > showing "Configuration file is valid" for every reloads. > > Is there anyone against removing this message by default? > This will still output the alerts and warnings