' || *s == '\n') {
+ while (*s != '\r' *s != '\n') {
char *p = s++;
if (!*p)
return p;
}
- *s++ = 0;
+ *s++ = '\0';
return s;
}
Best regards,
Krzysztof Olędzki
,
Krzysztof Olędzki
Hi all,
It was me. I removed this our/cherry P. account.
Best,
K.
On 2011-10-21 08:48, LinkedIn Password wrote:
LinkedIn
Hi cherry,
Can’t remember your LinkedIn password? No problem — it happens.
Please use this link to reset your password within the next 1 day:
On 2011-09-01 22:15, Julien Vehent wrote:
On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 03:09:56 +0200, Krzysztof Olędzki wrote:
Your concern is very valid and I think this is a moment where you
should take advantage of HAProxy, so you came to the right place. ;)
Each active session on HAProxy does not cost too much
that I can set the cookie's domain dynamically to handle
both of these cases?
How many different domains you need to handle? You can have several,
identical backends, each one dedicated for subdomains from one domain.
Best regards,
Krzysztof Olędzki
.
Best regards,
Krzysztof Olędzki
effective. Instead another
solution was chosen - LVS DR.
Best regards,
Krzysztof Olędzki
On 2010-12-02 10:03, Gerd Müller wrote:
On 01.12.2010 21:55, Krzysztof Olędzki wrote:
On 2010-11-11 12:59, Gerd Müller wrote:
Hi Krzystof,
thank you for your the net-snmp plugin for haproxy. It's a great help.
Since I am using OpenNMS I had to make small patch. OIDs for frontends
and backends
is it not possible
to address backends and frontends using two fields, like it is required
for servers? Yes, the last one will be 0 but it should not make a problem.
Best regards,
Krzysztof Olędzki
;a=commitdiff;h=c8b16fc94885adbf7b0146b847ce50530eab9e40
It allows you to enable health checks only once for each server and
configure other servers to follow state of a checked one.
HTH.
Best regards,
Krzysztof Olędzki
.
Best regards,
Krzysztof Olędzki
). Hopefully simple benchmarks (queryperf for
example) show that with 1kqps I'm still far enough from the limit. ;)
[1] ftp://ftp.isc.org/isc/dns_perf/ISC-TN-2008-1.pdf
Krzysztof Olędzki a écrit :
On 2010-09-28 10:51, Hamnedalen, Mikael wrote:
Hi.
Anyone used HAProxy to load balance DNS
tested it and it's OK for me, I'm merging it.
Thanks. If it is still possible, I believe it is worth to add a note
that the bug was reported by Guido Krause.
Best regards,
Krzysztof Olędzki
agree it's an important piece of
information, other people heavily rely on it.
My bad. Hopefully it should be trivial to get it back. I'll fix it.
Best regards,
Krzysztof Olędzki
have more CPUs than you NIC is able to support natively.
Also, please make sure that if you are using bondig or vlan, your kernel
is recent enough to propagate multiqueue over these additional layers.
Best regards,
Krzysztof Olędzki
willing to do it as a sponsored feature. If you are interested
please contact me privately.
Best regards,
Krzysztof Olędzki
days.
Has anyone already done this? Perl is not my strong point :-).
Yes, haproxy.pl-0.27 + haproxy-1.4 works.
Best regards,
Krzysztof Olędzki
,
Krzysztof Olędzki
($(TARGET),solaris).
Best regards,
Krzysztof Olędzki
and not rely on the standard includes which are only
there for compatibility with specific programs which define
_XOPEN_SOURCE.
I have several FreeBSD servers - 4.x, 5.x, 6.x, 7.x, and 8.x. None of
them have crypt.h. :(
Best regards,
Krzysztof Olędzki
fix it ASAP. However, currently I'm traveling so I can't
promise I'll be able to do it before the monday.
Thank you for your report.
Best regards,
Krzysztof Olędzki
you suggest a
workaround or fix to the bahavior in either Glassfish or HAProxy?
I'll try to fix it but first I need to reproduce it. Would it be
possible to provide me an access to such server?
Best regards,
Krzysztof Olędzki
,
Krzysztof Olędzki
show up in this night's snapshot.
Thanks.
Best regards,
Krzysztof Olędzki
X X
disabledX X X X
Sure. I have no idea why I did it wrong. :|
Best regards,
Krzysztof Olędzki
,
Krzysztof Olędzki
On 2010-01-06 21:31, Paul Hirose wrote:
2010/1/6 Krzysztof Olędzki o...@ans.pl:
On 2010-01-06 18:45, Paul Hirose wrote:
The docs under retries says if a connection attempt fails, it waits
one second, and then tries again.
This 1s timeout is only used in case of immediately error (like TCP RST
in the end. Now it builds for both 32 and 64 bits without
any warning.
Ooops, pointer arithmetics. :| I fixed it without thinking. :| My bad.
Best regards,
Krzysztof Olędzki
On 2009-12-16 00:06, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:42:14PM +0100, Krzysztof Piotr Oledzki wrote:
From 79b9d25eb78cb217b0a8fe90d33f14061db2a767 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Krzysztof Piotr Oledzki o...@ans.pl
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 23:40:47 +0100
Subject: BUG] config: fix
with respect to s/error_limit/error-limit/g.
Best regards,
Krzysztof Olędzki
On 2009-12-15 23:35, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi Krzysztof,
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:48:23PM +0100, Krzysztof Piotr Oledzki wrote:
From b05e4be21fc2a1f56fc43cedc0229dd45fb54158 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Krzysztof Piotr Oledzki o...@ans.pl
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 22:45:54 +0100
Subject: [BUG]
compatibility :-)
Sure thing. ;)
Best regards,
Krzysztof Olędzki
,
Krzysztof Olędzki
-stripped binary with valgrind[1]. If the bug is trivial it
should immediately show where the problem is.
[1] http://valgrind.org/
Best regards,
Krzysztof Olędzki
and are normally followed by other ones?
Best regards,
Krzysztof Olędzki
(suppressed: 4 from 4)
-Original Message-
From: Krzysztof Olędzki [mailto:o...@ans.pl]
Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 5:54 AM
To: John Lauro
Cc: haproxy@formilux.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] haproxy 1.4-dev4 and 1.3.21
On 2009-10-14 10:47, John Lauro wrote:
Sorry to report, from 1.3.21:
Oct 13
36 matches
Mail list logo
