Hi,
I am running (trying to, really) postfix with postscreen (really Zimbra) behind
haproxy.
I enabled proxy protocol support in Zimbra
08:27:26 (TEST) zimbra@zcs-fe5 [~] $ postconf |grep haproxy
postscreen_upstream_proxy_protocol = haproxy
08:26:47 (TEST) zimbra@zcs-fe6 [~] $ postconf
> Am 07.03.2023 um 18:26 schrieb Marc West :
>
> On 2023-03-07 08:09:04, Rainer Duffner wrote:
>> I admit I only toyed with TP, so I really don???t know what I???m doing
>> there, but:
>>
>> Have you tried to just use pfSense for this? The developer of th
> Am 07.03.2023 um 08:46 schrieb Marc West :
>
>
>
> Any other thoughts to look at or data that would be helpful to collect?
>
I admit I only toyed with TP, so I really don’t know what I’m doing there, but:
Have you tried to just use pfSense for this? The developer of the package
> Am 21.06.2021 um 18:25 schrieb Shawn Heisey :
>
> On 2021-06-20 06:03, Shawn Heisey wrote:
>> Unrelated, and off topic because it's mostly about Apache, but strange:
>> I've been doing some tests with webpagetest.org, and seeing REALLY
>> long load times for some resources in their waterfall
> Am 22.05.2018 um 06:46 schrieb TomK :
>
> Trying to mount an NFS share vi an Haproxy / Keepalived configuration. When I
> mount the NFS share directly from the host, bypassing Haproxy / Keepalived,
> it works fine. However, when I try via the Haproxy / Keepalived
> Am 03.03.2017 um 15:07 schrieb David King :
>
> Hi All
>
> Hoping someone will be able to help, we're running a bit of an interesting
> setup
>
> we have 3 HAProxy nodes running freebsd 11.0 , each host runs 4 jails, each
> running haproxy, but only one of the
> Am 06.05.2016 um 00:15 schrieb Thierry FOURNIER
> :
>
> Hi,
>
> You can look here:
>
> http://discourse.haproxy.org/t/ironbee-in-haproxy/92
>
> Thierry
>
>
Is that project actually alive?
The last (and what looks like only) commit this year was to
> Am 30.09.2015 um 16:25 schrieb Jeff Palmer :
>
> Arnall,
>
>
> This advice is less of an haproxy specific response, and more of
> general information.
>
> As someone who's tried to manage mixed infrastructure, I would push
> back if possible, unles syour organization has
> Am 01.10.2015 um 01:22 schrieb Willy Tarreau :
>
>>
>
> I'd be tempted to place my judgement between yours and Jeff's. I'd say
> that if the company is already using the target OS on any other place,
> the cost of switching is low. If the load balancer is the opportunity
> to
I consider openssh for sftp pretty much unusable for clients/customers.
I wouldn’t say that.
Certainly true if they don’t actually know what they’re doing.
As for the setup: yes, the first directory users can write to in a chroot-setup
is a subdirectory of the home directory (because $HOME
Am 01.01.2015 um 14:37 schrieb PiBa-NL piba.nl@gmail.com:
Yosef Amir schreef op 1-1-2015 om 13:57:
listen IMAP_SSL
mode tcp
bind :443 name VVM_SSL
balance roundrobin
tcp-check connect port 443
Maybe try the 'ssl' keyword as below. (i have not tested
Am 11.12.2014 um 15:26 schrieb David Adams dr...@yahoo.com
mailto:dr...@yahoo.com:
We are running 1.5.9 on Centos 6.5. It crashes 10 seconds (give or take a
few seconds) after 1am, 5am, 9am, 1pm, 5pm and 9pm, like clockwork; let's
call that CRASHTIME. Previously we'd been using 1.5.3
Hi,
we use HAPROXY for incoming mail, outgoing mail (authenticated), POP3, IMAP.
With incoming mail, I can make use of HAProxy’s send-proxy feature to make the
source-IP known to the backend SMTP-servers.
(Works in the lab, I just need to move a few hundred customers off port 25 for
Hi,
I’ve configured nginx+haproxy in front of a couple of IIS servers.
NGINX terminates SSL.
configuration is as following:
global
log /var/run/log local5
log /var/run/log local1 notice
#log loghostlocal0 info
maxconn 4096
#debug
#quiet
user www
group www
daemon
Hi,
I want to take the status of a server of a given backend and use it in
another backend or in the frontend.
If that possible?
I though there might be something simular to
nbsrv() - but I haven't found anything.
Best Regards
Rainer
Hi,
we will put haproxy in front of a Zimbra infrastructure (which we have
split-up, so that there is a „front end“, with pop, imap, smtp and a „back
end“, where the mail sits).
I have too haproxy-servers (active/standby via CARP) that are checking the
front-ends.
I check:
- smtp
- smtps
Am 28.08.2014 um 22:41 schrieb Baptiste bed...@gmail.com:
Hi,
maybe you could share your HAProxy configuration :)
By default, HAProxy tests a service every 3s, which is fine. It just
does a tcp connect, so nothing complicated for your server to handle.
Since we switched to
Am 28.08.2014 um 23:21 schrieb Baptiste bed...@gmail.com:
Ok,
I would create a monitoring backend, such as below:
Hey, thanks a lot!
I will try this and report back.
Best Regards,
Rainer
hdr(host) ACL only applies to HTTP.
Furthermore, I'm not sure there is a notion of Host header in FTP ;)
Last time I looked (admittedly with 1.4) into FTP+HAProxy, the
end-result was that it was just not possible.
AFAIK, you can use LVS for that on Linux.
Am 30.07.2013 um 21:40 schrieb Lukas Tribus luky...@hotmail.com:
Hi Rainer!
I'm using haproxy on FreeBSD 9.1-amd64 inside a VMware VM.
I realized that when I have a situation where all servers in a backend
are down, haproxy crashes:
Jul 30 08:03:52 px2-bla kernel: pid 58816 (haproxy),
Hi,
I'm using haproxy on FreeBSD 9.1-amd64 inside a VMware VM.
I realized that when I have a situation where all servers in a backend
are down, haproxy crashes:
Jul 30 08:03:52 px2-bla kernel: pid 58816 (haproxy), uid 80:
exited on signal 11 (core dumped)
pkg info|grep haproxy
haproxy-1.4.24
Am Tue, 30 Jul 2013 21:40:34 +0200
schrieb Lukas Tribus luky...@hotmail.com:
Hi Rainer!
I'm using haproxy on FreeBSD 9.1-amd64 inside a VMware VM.
I realized that when I have a situation where all servers in a
backend are down, haproxy crashes:
Jul 30 08:03:52 px2-bla kernel: pid
22 matches
Mail list logo