On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 10:22:17PM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> > I'm just thinking, we have a SILENT_DEFINE macro that should already
> > address this. Could you please try to pass your -f... there ? If it
> > works it would just be a matter of improving the SILENT_DEFINE
> > description to
❦ 22 October 2021 21:08 +02, Willy Tarreau:
>> ? 19 October 2021 09:22 +02, Vincent Bernat:
>>
>> > This could be backported to 2.4. Older versions do not display CFLAGS.
>>
>> Note that if you find this too ugly, I have no problem to maintain this
>> as an OOT patch.
>
> I don't find it
Hi Vincent,
On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 09:23:25AM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ? 19 October 2021 09:22 +02, Vincent Bernat:
>
> > This could be backported to 2.4. Older versions do not display CFLAGS.
>
> Note that if you find this too ugly, I have no problem to maintain this
> as an OOT patch.
❦ 19 October 2021 09:22 +02, Vincent Bernat:
> This could be backported to 2.4. Older versions do not display CFLAGS.
Note that if you find this too ugly, I have no problem to maintain this
as an OOT patch.
--
Avoid unnecessary branches.
- The Elements of Programming Style
Some distributions (Debian) adds `-ffile-prefix-map=/current/pwd=` to
CFLAGS in an attempt to make the package more reproducible when source
code is using `__FILE__`. Unfortunately, this makes HAProxy build not
reproducible since CFLAGS is recorded to be displayed in `haproxy
--version`. To solve
5 matches
Mail list logo