> Le 27 sept. 2019 à 12:23, Geoff Simmons a écrit :
>
> On 9/26/19 19:27, Emmanuel Hocdet wrote:
>
>>> And I wonder if there are situations in which someone will want to
>>> specifically choose one source of truth for authority over the other.
>>> Suppose an incoming connection uses TLS with a
On 9/26/19 19:27, Emmanuel Hocdet wrote:
>
>>>
>>> Proposal reworking after playing with « authority » and look at how « src
>>> »/« dst » are working.
>>>
>>> Authority » can come from transport layer (TLS), ProxyV2 TLV or «
>>> set-authority ».
>>> « src/dst » is set from transport layer (TCP)
> Le 26 sept. 2019 à 18:10, Geoff Simmons a écrit :
>
> On 9/26/19 11:43, Emmanuel Hocdet wrote:
>>
>> Proposal reworking after playing with « authority » and look at how « src
>> »/« dst » are working.
>>
>> Authority » can come from transport layer (TLS), ProxyV2 TLV or «
>> set-authority
Geoff,
Am 26.09.19 um 18:10 schrieb Geoff Simmons:
> Incidentally, I too have not seen a patch on this thread since September
> 10th (not sure if you meant to send a new one today).
>
see my sibling emails to this thread:
https://www.mail-archive.com/haproxy@formilux.org/msg35005.html
Best rega
On 9/26/19 11:43, Emmanuel Hocdet wrote:
>
> Proposal reworking after playing with « authority » and look at how « src »/«
> dst » are working.
>
> Authority » can come from transport layer (TLS), ProxyV2 TLV or «
> set-authority ».
> « src/dst » is set from transport layer (TCP), overwrite by
Manu,
Am 26.09.19 um 17:40 schrieb Emmanuel Hocdet:
> I see it on my side.
>
Ah, again it's the stupid Apple Mail issue at fault. It misconstructs
emails with attachments and the attachment is only visible when viewing
the HTML version. I can confirm the patch is there when showing HTML
Technic
Hi Tim,
> Le 26 sept. 2019 à 15:11, Tim Düsterhus a écrit :
>
> Manu,
>
> Am 26.09.19 um 11:43 schrieb Emmanuel Hocdet:
>> Included my patch for that proposal. (could be split with comments from this
>> mail)
>
> Did you forgot to actually attach the patch? I'm not seeing anything.
>
I s
Manu,
Am 26.09.19 um 11:43 schrieb Emmanuel Hocdet:
> Included my patch for that proposal. (could be split with comments from this
> mail)
Did you forgot to actually attach the patch? I'm not seeing anything.
Best regards
Tim Düsterhus
Hi,Proposal reworking after playing with « authority » and look at how « src »/« dst » are working.Authority » can come from transport layer (TLS), ProxyV2 TLV or « set-authority ».« src/dst » is set from transport layer (TCP), overwrite by Proxy-protocol and « set-{src,dst} »I propose to do the sa
patch update with bug fix
> Le 10 sept. 2019 à 14:19, Emmanuel Hocdet a écrit :
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Included, my first proposal for « set-authority » action, to set
> custom "authority" sample fetch.
>
> Use case could be to use « sni authority » in server line.
> For "proxy-v2-options authority
Hi,
Included, my first proposal for « set-authority » action, to set
custom "authority" sample fetch.
Use case could be to use « sni authority » in server line.
For "proxy-v2-options authority », authority is pick from custom
authority (« set-authority »), ppv2 authority or ssl_fc_sni.
Sample
11 matches
Mail list logo