Le Lundi 1 Février 2010 23:43:26, Holger Just a écrit :
Hi
On 2010-02-01 23:32, Cyril Bonté wrote:
This would give something like :
- UP : the server is UP because the tracked server is UP
- DOWN/DOWN : the server is DOWN because the tracked server is DOWN = the
line is in red
-
Hi again,
Le Mardi 2 Février 2010 21:07:04, Cyril Bonté a écrit :
OK, you'll find a small update (smaller than I firstly thought) in attachment.
please forget the previous one and find this new one that correctly hide all
DOWN and MAINT servers.
Thanks ;)
--
Cyril Bonté
diff -Naur
Hi Cyril,
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 11:00:47PM +0100, Cyril Bonté wrote:
Hi again,
Le Mardi 2 Février 2010 21:07:04, Cyril Bonté a écrit :
OK, you'll find a small update (smaller than I firstly thought) in
attachment.
please forget the previous one and find this new one that correctly
Hi Willy,
Le Mardi 2 Février 2010 23:39:22, Willy Tarreau a écrit :
at first I was hesitating because those DOWN/MAINT can become quite
confusing, but after some thinking, the current situation is already
confusing.
So I think I'll merge this one but if someone comes up with a less
Le Mardi 2 Février 2010 23:52:36, Cyril Bonté a écrit :
Le Mardi 2 Février 2010 23:39:22, Willy Tarreau a écrit :
(...)
In my opinion the real state is MAINT, and we may complete it with
some info indicating that it was propagated from another server.
Maybe something such as MAINT(via) or
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 11:52:36PM +0100, Cyril Bonté wrote:
Hi Willy,
Le Mardi 2 Février 2010 23:39:22, Willy Tarreau a écrit :
at first I was hesitating because those DOWN/MAINT can become quite
confusing, but after some thinking, the current situation is already
confusing.
So I
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 12:26:28AM +0100, Cyril Bonté wrote:
Le Mardi 2 Février 2010 23:52:36, Cyril Bonté a écrit :
Le Mardi 2 Février 2010 23:39:22, Willy Tarreau a écrit :
(...)
In my opinion the real state is MAINT, and we may complete it with
some info indicating that it was
Hi,
Le Lundi 1 Février 2010 12:13:23, Holger Just a écrit :
Hi,
On 2010-01-31 11:33 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
I'm hesitating whether we should report the tracking servers the
same color, because it's not an error if they appear down, it's
an expected condition which should not
Hi willy,
this is a first attempt to add a maintenance mode on servers, using the stat
socket (in admin level).
It can be done with the following command :
set maintenance backend/server on (or off to leave the maintenance mode).
In this mode, no more checks will be performed on the server and
This is really cool.
I recently wrote a script to do a 'slow down' that writes decreasing
percentages to the stats socket over a configurable time window.
It would be really cool to be able to use the slow start logic
internal to haproxy combined with this command to implement all of
what I
Hi Cyril,
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 07:54:55PM +0100, Cyril Bonté wrote:
Hi willy,
this is a first attempt to add a maintenance mode on servers, using the stat
socket (in admin level).
It can be done with the following command :
set maintenance backend/server on (or off to leave the
Le Dimanche 31 Janvier 2010 20:32:45, Willy Tarreau a écrit :
OK. Is the server subject to the slowstart timer once it
leaves maintenance mode ?
Yes, the call to set_server_up() will set the SRV_WARMINGUP flag.
If some servers were tracking it, they'll go UP until the server leave the
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 10:34:03PM +0100, Cyril Bonté wrote:
OK, I didn't see it like this. I thought it was better to have the same
behaviour as if those servers were not checked at all, and that users have
the possibility to disable the tracking servers by hand.
In fact not because the
13 matches
Mail list logo
