Hi Aleks,
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 09:43:40AM +0200, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
Be careful, if you want to implement a resolver, you can't use the
libc's
since the process is supposed to be chrooted, so you'll need to
implement
an autonomous resolver with an IP address to be used as the DNS
Hi Willy,
On 13-05-2012 11:00, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi Aleks,
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 09:43:40AM +0200, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
Be careful, if you want to implement a resolver, you can't use the
libc's
since the process is supposed to be chrooted, so you'll need to
implement
an autonomous
Sometimes it would be resolvable and other times not, it depends if
the host has reported itself to the DNS server previously and it's
still in the bind cache after going down. I suspect that this is
happening if the host is down and there is no IP for it in the DNS
tables, but that's just guess
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 02:53:45PM -0500, Andres Thomas Stivalet wrote:
That's why I've added this to the TODO list :-)
Thanks Willy!
For the same reason, you cannot safely install firewalls nor VPNs in such
environments.
I'd just like to mention that it's certainly possible to
Given how the current farm toolset operates under the hostname assumption
we're still going to have change hostnames etc.
We're currently evaluating if we want to patch haproxy for our needs or
track our machines some other way.
Patching haproxy seems like the sane route. :)
On May 12, 2012 3:17
5 matches
Mail list logo
