Thank you for your reply, I had to stop the testing, cause it made to
much trouble.
Has someone a good idea how to produce enough load to reconstruct the
situation?
I need load to solve this problem. Everything is working fine without.
As soon as I find a way to construct some test condition I w
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 02:29:12PM +0100, Sebastian Fohler wrote:
> On 12.02.2012 14:24, Cyril Bonté wrote:
> >You said that you couldn't find anything useful in the logs.
> >From the configuration you just posted, you're using the default log
> >format.
> >You should use an enhanced one, at least
Hi Cyril, Sebastian,
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 10:49:26PM +0100, Cyril Bonté wrote:
> Le 12/02/2012 22:31, Sebastian Fohler a écrit :
> >I've noticed that too.
> >The problem is, when I try to reach the backendservers themselves (they
> >are all reachable by there own name, adserve1/adserver2/...).
Le 12/02/2012 22:31, Sebastian Fohler a écrit :
I've noticed that too.
The problem is, when I try to reach the backendservers themselves (they
are all reachable by there own name, adserve1/adserver2/...). The don't
show any problems at all, the question in that case is, how do I find
out which er
I've noticed that too.
The problem is, when I try to reach the backendservers themselves (they
are all reachable by there own name, adserve1/adserver2/...). The don't
show any problems at all, the question in that case is, how do I find
out which error they throw, seen from the lb end.
Sure I h
On the last screenshot you set, you had a lot of retries...
Which means there may be some issues for your HAProxy to reach the
server sometimes.
Have you checked all the network settings (speed and duplex) on both
servers (web and vsphere) and switches?
I've changed nbproc to 1 now, as I did change the httpclose option, it
seems to help a little.
The adserver.adworxs.net backends are physical servers.
The adserver.dev.adworxs.net backends are vm's.
There are four physical NICs used by the vsphere server.
Greets,
Sebastian
On 12.02.2012 14:42,
Your nbproc is still 2.
You should turn it to 1.
You should also remove the option httpclose, replacing it by option
http-server-close.
It will save some packets on the client side.
Are the backend servers VMs too?
Are they hosted on the same vsphere server?
How many physical network cards are used
On 12.02.2012 14:24, Cyril Bonté wrote:
Take into account that virtualization can be a bottleneck for a
network component like haproxy.
I know that, that's the reason I used one physical nic especially for
the haproxy instances.
Sure there could still be some problem, but that would be a mette
Le 12/02/2012 13:21, Sebastian Fohler a écrit :
Hi,
On 12.02.2012 12:54, Baptiste wrote:
lukaszjagielloorg
Hi,
When speaking about virtualization, there are so many factors to take
into account.
- which hypervisor are we speaking about ?
VMWare ESXi 5.0
Take into account that virtualizati
I did sent you the screenshot, before the changes.
Just to clear that out.
How do I know that HAProxy is taking all the CPU resources?
PFSense shows the CPU and NIC Traffic resources, I get a rising CPU load
until it's 100% and after that haproxy stops the adserver.adworxs.net
frontend the adse
Hi,
On 12.02.2012 12:54, Baptiste wrote:
lukaszjagielloorg
Hi,
When speaking about virtualization, there are so many factors to take
into account.
- which hypervisor are we speaking about ?
VMWare ESXi 5.0
- what phisical NIC are using?
Broadcom Corporation Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM5716 1
Hi Sebastian,
Can you take a screenshot of your stats page and share it with us?
Then, please do the changes below in your configuration:
turn nbproc to 1
increase the maxconn on the frontend to 4000
cheers
ous thread, then. It would be
easier for everyone.
Thanks for your help, I guess you'll have better answers with such an
effort ;-)
Le 12/02/2012 11:05, Sebastian Fohler a écrit :
I've checked the values Willy posted on the haproxy page. All my
hardware configurations should meet t
2012/2/12 Łukasz Jagiełło :
> 2012/2/12 Sebastian Fohler :
>> I've checked the values Willy posted on the haproxy page. All my hardware
>> configurations should meet the needs of haproxy. Still I have major
>> performance problems. How do I best find out why? The
I've checked the values Willy posted on the haproxy page. All my hardware
configurations should meet the needs of haproxy. Still I have major
performance problems. How do I best find out why? The logs tell me not
nearly anything I neec to now to fix that problems. Since I use vm's to try
hapro
2012/2/12 Sebastian Fohler :
> I've checked the values Willy posted on the haproxy page. All my hardware
> configurations should meet the needs of haproxy. Still I have major
> performance problems. How do I best find out why? The logs tell me not
> nearly anything I neec t
the needs of haproxy. Still I have
major performance problems. How do I best find out why? The logs tell me
not nearly anything I neec to now to fix that problems. Since I use vm's
to try haproxy, I'm able to change some specifics in case I need to.
My Hardware assigned to the vm's is
I've checked the values Willy posted on the haproxy page. All my
hardware configurations should meet the needs of haproxy. Still I have
major performance problems. How do I best find out why? The logs tell me
not nearly anything I neec to now to fix that problems. Since I use vm'
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 12:50:00PM -0700, James Hartshorn wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We run Haproxy on Amazon ec2 for http load balancing. On Monday
> (august 11) we upgraded seven of our load balancers in two of our
> products to 1.3.20 from 1.3.15.8 (four servers, all of one product)
> and 1.3.18 (t
Hi,
We run Haproxy on Amazon ec2 for http load balancing. On Monday
(august 11) we upgraded seven of our load balancers in two of our
products to 1.3.20 from 1.3.15.8 (four servers, all of one product)
and 1.3.18 (three servers, all of the other product). We kept the
config files the same. We f
21 matches
Mail list logo
