On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 08:04:08AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Does anyone have any opinion, objection or suggestion on this (especially
> those in CC who participated to the first discussion or who could have
> packaging concerns) ? Barring any comment I think I'm going to do this
> tomorrow so
On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 10:03:16AM +0200, William Lallemand wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 08:04:08AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> > So after changing my mind, I would go with the following approach:
> >
> > - building with USE_SLZ=1 => always use the embedded one
Hello,
On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 08:04:08AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> [...]
>
> So after changing my mind, I would go with the following approach:
>
> - building with USE_SLZ=1 => always use the embedded one
> - building with USE_ZLIB=1 => always build using the user-provided zlib
>
>
On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 09:36:52AM +0200, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> Willy,
>
> [cleaning CC List]
>
> On 4/21/21 8:04 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > Does anyone have any opinion, objection or suggestion on this (especially
> > those in CC who participated to the first discussion or who could have
> >
Willy,
[cleaning CC List]
On 4/21/21 8:04 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Does anyone have any opinion, objection or suggestion on this (especially
those in CC who participated to the first discussion or who could have
packaging concerns) ? Barring any comment I think I'm going to do this
tomorrow so
On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 08:13:57AM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> From a distribution point of view, we don't like bundled dependencies.
> However, as I see it, libslz is an internal lib (like ebtree), so I
> don't think this is really a problem. Moreover, we don't have the
> external lib in
On 21.04.2021., at 08:04, Willy Tarreau wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> […]
> So after changing my mind, I would go with the following approach:
>
> - building with USE_SLZ=1 => always use the embedded one
> - building with USE_ZLIB=1 => always build using the user-provided zlib
>
> We'd enable
❦ 21 avril 2021 08:04 +02, Willy Tarreau:
> William suggested that I was needlessly seeking for trouble and that it
> was pointless to keep compatibility for *both* an external version and
> an internal one. While I initially wanted to demonstrate him he was wrong,
> I realized that I was the
Hi all,
After Lukas and Ilya's comments on the difficulty to use libslz, last
week I tried to find a way to cleanly import libslz into haproxy (that's
only 2 files basically), *and* at the same time keep the ability to use
an external one for those who want. It resulted in a configuration mess
9 matches
Mail list logo
