Willy,
On 10/18/21 10:51 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 09:18:12AM +0200, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
Hu, interesting. Is the GitHub Mirror Sync broken? I'm seeing changes in
https://git.haproxy.org/?p=haproxy.git, but not in GitHub.
So it was in relation with the Painful Access
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 09:18:12AM +0200, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> Hu, interesting. Is the GitHub Mirror Sync broken? I'm seeing changes in
> https://git.haproxy.org/?p=haproxy.git, but not in GitHub.
So it was in relation with the Painful Access Token apparently. The
mirror user was not allowed
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 09:18:12AM +0200, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> Willy,
>
> On 10/18/21 9:15 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 09:09:01AM +0200, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> > > Feel free to replace 'unsigned int' with 'uint' and reformat the struct as
> > > needed.
> >
> > Done an
Willy,
On 10/18/21 9:15 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 09:09:01AM +0200, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
Feel free to replace 'unsigned int' with 'uint' and reformat the struct as
needed.
Done an pushed, thank you!
Willy
Hu, interesting. Is the GitHub Mirror Sync broken? I'm seeing
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 09:09:01AM +0200, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> Feel free to replace 'unsigned int' with 'uint' and reformat the struct as
> needed.
Done an pushed, thank you!
Willy
Willy,
On 10/18/21 7:22 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 06:24:18PM +0200, Tim Duesterhus wrote:
see 6a0dd733906611dea958cf74b9f51bb16028ae20
Found using GitHub's CodeQL scan.
---
include/haproxy/stick_table-t.h | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 06:24:18PM +0200, Tim Duesterhus wrote:
> see 6a0dd733906611dea958cf74b9f51bb16028ae20
>
> Found using GitHub's CodeQL scan.
> ---
> include/haproxy/stick_table-t.h | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git
On Sat, Jan 18, 2020 at 11:41:58AM +0100, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> Fair enough. In the specific implementation of gcc it might be okay. But
> that doesn't say anything about clang (but I guess it's okay as well).
Clang tries hard to support whatever gcc does and when I mean gcc I
implicitly also
Willy,
Am 18.01.20 um 07:51 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
>> - Non-ints are not allowed by the C standard.
>
> Hmmm that's not exactly what I'm reading in C99 #6.7.2.1 here, which
> explicitly permits implementation-defined types:
>
>"A bit-field shall have a type that is a qualified or
Hi Tim,
On Sat, Jan 18, 2020 at 01:32:49AM +0100, Tim Duesterhus wrote:
> Willy,
>
> I did not touch the `struct pat_time` in pattern.h which appears to be
> completely unused. Please check whether adjustments should be made there
> as well or whether it should simply be removed. Feel free to
10 matches
Mail list logo