Hi Andrew,
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 11:32:49AM -0400, Andrew Rodland wrote:
(...)
> I haven't found the cause of this, or been able to pin it down much further
> than that it happens fairly reliably when doing a "haproxy -sf" restart under
> load.
OK I'll have to test it.
> Other than that, I
On Thursday, September 15, 2016 4:06:15 AM EDT Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 02:44:26PM -0400, Andrew Rodland wrote:
> > On Sunday, September 11, 2016 7:57:41 PM EDT Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > > > > Also I've been thinking about this issue of the infinite loop that
>
Hi Andrew,
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 02:44:26PM -0400, Andrew Rodland wrote:
> On Sunday, September 11, 2016 7:57:41 PM EDT Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > > > Also I've been thinking about this issue of the infinite loop that you
> > > > solved already. As long as c > 1 I don't think it can happen at
On Sunday, September 11, 2016 7:57:41 PM EDT Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > > Also I've been thinking about this issue of the infinite loop that you
> > > solved already. As long as c > 1 I don't think it can happen at all,
> > > because for any server having a load strictly greater than the average
> >
On Sunday, September 11, 2016 7:57:41 PM EDT Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 01:45:35PM -0400, Andrew Rodland wrote:
> > On Sunday, September 11, 2016 9:11:50 AM EDT Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > > Don't worry, that's the principle of a PoC. I looked at your code. I
> > >
Hi Andrew,
On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 01:45:35PM -0400, Andrew Rodland wrote:
> On Sunday, September 11, 2016 9:11:50 AM EDT Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > Don't worry, that's the principle of a PoC. I looked at your code. I think
> > we can significantly simplify it. The current server's relative
On Sunday, September 11, 2016 9:11:50 AM EDT Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Don't worry, that's the principle of a PoC. I looked at your code. I think
> we can significantly simplify it. The current server's relative capacity
> should be computed on the fly when trying to pick the server in the ring.
>
Hi Andrew,
On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 02:28:47PM -0400, Andrew Rodland wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> === Background material, skip this if you just want to know what I've done ===
>
> For some time I've been wishing for a way to combine the best aspects of
> consistent hashing and "balance leastconn".
8 matches
Mail list logo