I'm also testing some ldap checks but I see lots of logging and log
partitions filling up like crazy.
I wonder if it's really doable to check the ldap status in in a gracefull way.
2015-03-31 9:45 GMT+02:00 Neil - HAProxy List
maillist-hapr...@iamafreeman.com:
Hello
I was thinking of updating
Hello
I was thinking of updating the ldap-check but I think I've a better idea.
Macros (well ish).
send-binary 300c0201 # LDAP bind request ROOT simple
send-binary 01 # message ID
send-binary 6007 # protocol Op
send-binary 0201 # bind request
send-binary 03 # LDAP v3
send-binary
Hi Matt,
The issue with LDAP, is that it is not a banner protocol.
So either you check the TCP port is well bound on the server for a
simple L4 check, for L7, you don't have the choice, you must send a
message and check the server's result.
Baptiste
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 9:53 AM, Matt .
Hi Baptiste,
Yes I've seen it also and never got around large logs.
What do most people do, empty logt very often ?
2015-03-31 11:29 GMT+02:00 Baptiste bed...@gmail.com:
Hi Matt,
The issue with LDAP, is that it is not a banner protocol.
So either you check the TCP port is well bound on
I think they play with their syslog server to detect a check from real
traffic and prevent the syslog server to log the checks.
Baptiste
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Matt . yamakasi@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Baptiste,
Yes I've seen it also and never got around large logs.
What do most
I was thinking of updating the ldap-check but I think I've a better idea.
Macros (well ish).
send-binary 300c0201 # LDAP bind request ROOT simple
send-binary 01 # message ID
send-binary 6007 # protocol Op
send-binary 0201 # bind request
send-binary 03 # LDAP v3
send-binary
you should believe it :)
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 11:34 PM, Neil - HAProxy List
maillist-hapr...@iamafreeman.com wrote:
Hello
Thanks so much. That worked well, I now get
L7OK/0 in 0ms
not sure I believe the 0ms but maybe I should
Thanks again,
Neil
On 30 March 2015 at 22:14, Baptiste
Hello
Thanks so much. That worked well, I now get
*L7OK/0 in 0ms*
not sure I believe the 0ms but maybe I should
Thanks again,
Neil
On 30 March 2015 at 22:14, Baptiste bed...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 10:33 PM, Neil - HAProxy List
maillist-hapr...@iamafreeman.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 10:33 PM, Neil - HAProxy List
maillist-hapr...@iamafreeman.com wrote:
Hello
I'm trying to use ldap-check with active directory and the response active
directory gives is not one ldap-check is happy to accept
when I give a 389 directory backend ldap server all is well,
9 matches
Mail list logo
