On 22-4-2010 20:28, Michiel van Es wrote:
Yes
That is the default smtp failover setup but I want to balance the load
via a load balancer setup
Mx records can not balance load
If you have 2 mx records with the same priority, your load should be
balanced..
Or you could have a single mx
Angelo Höngens wrote:
On 22-4-2010 20:28, Michiel van Es wrote:
Yes
That is the default smtp failover setup but I want to balance the load
via a load balancer setup
Mx records can not balance load
If you have 2 mx records with the same priority, your load should be
balanced..
Or you could
On 23-4-2010 11:19, Michiel van Es wrote:
Angelo Höngens wrote:
On 22-4-2010 20:28, Michiel van Es wrote:
Yes
That is the default smtp failover setup but I want to balance the load
via a load balancer setup
Mx records can not balance load
If you have 2 mx records with the same
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 11:36:12AM +0200, Michiel van Es wrote:
Don't look blindly at the tools you're using, but choose the tools you
need based on the goal you're trying to reach. Ah, who am I kidding, I'm
just an IT-nerd wanting to play with cool balancers as well..
That is the whole idea
I read this archive from 2008:
http://www.formilux.org/archives/haproxy/0801/0507.html
But the problem is that I can not recompile the kernel :(
Isn't there any other way like the x-forward-for header to make this work?
Kind regards,
Michiel
On 4/22/10 5:55 PM, Michiel van Es wrote:
Hi,
I
Michiel van Es wrote:
I read this archive from 2008:
http://www.formilux.org/archives/haproxy/0801/0507.html
But the problem is that I can not recompile the kernel :(
Isn't there any other way like the x-forward-for header to make this work?
As this runs on layer 4 headers can not be
On 4/22/10 6:03 PM, Chris Sarginson wrote:
Michiel van Es wrote:
I read this archive from 2008:
http://www.formilux.org/archives/haproxy/0801/0507.html
But the problem is that I can not recompile the kernel :(
Isn't there any other way like the x-forward-for header to make this
work?
As
-Message d'origine-
De : Michiel van Es [mailto:m...@pcintelligence.nl]
Envoyé : jeudi 22 avril 2010 18:11
À : Chris Sarginson
Cc : haproxy@formilux.org
Objet : Re: question about transparancy
On 4/22/10 6:03 PM, Chris Sarginson wrote:
Michiel van Es wrote:
I read
Hi,
Why dont you use 2 MX record with the same weight
All email will come in to youre 2 servers.
Just my 2¢
Bye
Michiel van Es a écrit :
Hi,
I am running 2 mailservers with ASSP as a spam proxy.
I use haproxy to load balance between the 2 mailservers.
The problem is that the spam filter
Yes
That is the default smtp failover setup but I want to balance the load
via a load balancer setup
Mx records can not balance load
Regards
Michiel van Es
Op 22 apr 2010 om 19:06 heeft Guillaume Bourque guillaume.bour...@gmail.com
het volgende geschreven:\
Hi,
Why dont you use 2 MX
Hmm, I found out that it is not supported for mode tcp:
Starting HAproxy: [WARNING] 111/213701 (5089) : config : 'option
forwardfor' ignored for proxy 'load_balanced_smtp' as it requires HTTP mode.
[ OK ]
Is this possible for the
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 09:47:51PM +0200, Michiel van Es wrote:
Hmm, I found out that it is not supported for mode tcp:
Starting HAproxy: [WARNING] 111/213701 (5089) : config : 'option
forwardfor' ignored for proxy 'load_balanced_smtp' as it requires HTTP mode.
12 matches
Mail list logo