Hi David,
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 02:31:03PM +0100, David CARLIER wrote:
> Hi willy,
>
> I think that would be useful to backport it, even when 1.7 will be
> out, the 1.6 branch will be still used.
Oops sorry I missed your e-mail and discovered that I hadn't pushed
Bertrand's patch that I
Hi,
HAProxy 1.7-dev5 was released on 2016/10/25. It added 65 new commits
after version 1.7-dev4.
Things have been calming down since last release, which is quite good.
Among the changes I've noticed when preparing this release, the following
ones caught my attention:
- minimum supported
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 05:04:12PM -0400, Andrew Rodland wrote:
> It was accidentally added as "balance-factor". Fix it and
> re-alphabetize.
merged, thanks Andrew!
Willy
It was accidentally added as "balance-factor". Fix it and
re-alphabetize.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Rodland
---
doc/configuration.txt | 54 +--
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/configuration.txt
Dear list!
This is an automated relay of the Github pull request: Fix typo in description
of `-st` parameter
Author: Jorrit Schippers
Number of patches: 1
Patch titles:
Fix typo in description of `-st` parameter
Link: https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/pull/65
Edit locally:
Hello HaProxy Team,
*MyObjective*:Client upload file via HaProxy and it will upload in sftp
servers
*example*:
expected this type of configuration in Ha Proxy
a.kk.com
192.168.0.1(sftp 1 server ip)
b.kk.com
192.168.0.2(sftp
Good morning,
Got my coffee ready before I read and reply:-)
On 25/10/2016 12:42 πμ, Lukas Tribus wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> Am 24.10.2016 um 22:32 schrieb Pavlos Parissis:
>>
>> IMHO: Ask the users to not perform reloads every 2miliseconds. It is
>> insane. You may spend X hours on this which
On 25/10/2016 01:21 πμ, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 12:42:26AM +0200, Lukas Tribus wrote:
>> Not fixing *real world issues* because we don't agree with the use-case or
>> there is a design misconception somewhere else is dangerous. We don't have
>> to support every
Hi Andrew,
just not having luck with this. Here is my rule which is certainly used
when e.g. calling https://www.arocom.de/de/team but it doesn't redirect
to https://www.arocom.de/team
Any idea what's wrong?
backend backend_aweb2_https
acl r_host hdr(host) -i -n www.arocom.de
acl r_path
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 22, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Another important point, when you say you restart every 2ms, are you
> certain you have a way to ensure that everything is completely started
> before you issue your signal to kill the old process ? I'm asking because
> thanks to the principle that the
Hey Willy,
Willy Tarreau wrote:
> I absolutely despise systemd and each time I have to work on the
> wrapper I feel like I'm going to throw up. So for me working on this
> crap is a huge pain each time. But I'm really fed up with seeing
> people having problems in this crazy environment because
On 22/10/2016 08:08 πμ, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Pavlos,
>
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 03:01:52PM +0200, Pavlos Parissis wrote:
>>> I'm not surprized that always works better, but my point is that if it's
>>> much better it can be useful to stay with it, but if it's only 1% better
>>> it's not
Hi Jarno,
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 11:43:44AM +0300, Jarno Huuskonen wrote:
> This is probably a bit off topic, but there's sd_notify call
> (and [Service] Type=notify)
> where service can notify systemd that it's done starting/reloading
> configuration:
>
Thanks Andrew,
That's the same regex that I have in my backend definition. But I also
need the ACLs to make sure that the redirect only happens on a specific
host and with a specific beginning of a path. Otherwise that would be
redirected every time and end up in an infinite loop, doesn't it?
Hello Jürgen
Sorry for the delay in replying to you.
after a little playing I have come up with this single line without an ACL
which seems to do what you want.
It will redirect http://domain.com/de/this/that/other/dir
To
http://domain.com/this/that/other/dir
reqrep ^([^\ :]*)\ /de/(.*)
Hello Jürgen
Thank you for your reply saying its the same line you already have
I did this on a single VIP assuming you just wanted to rewrite /de to / and
have everything below /de/page-x become /page-x
If this is the case it works well and does not produce a redirect loop.
Try it out and see
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 03:14:59PM +, James Stroehmann wrote:
> We have updated our test instance of HAProxy to 1.6.9 but are still able to
> reproduce the issue.
>
>
> From: Stroehmann, James
> Sent: Friday, October 07, 2016 2:44 PM
> To: haproxy@formilux.org
> Subject: Issue with windows
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 11:46:53AM +0300, Dmitry Maslov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm keep digging on this problem and that's what I've found so far:
> I have another one frontend/backend pair handled by the same instance, and
> it looks like whenever this backend goes slow, everything goes slow.
> Why
Hi Holger,
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 12:38:26PM +0200, Holger Just wrote:
> Hey Willy,
>
> Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > I absolutely despise systemd and each time I have to work on the
> > wrapper I feel like I'm going to throw up. So for me working on this
> > crap is a huge pain each time. But I'm
Hi Hugo,
I'm CCing Bertrand who implemented the netscaler CIP protocol.
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 01:36:40PM -0700, Hugo Slabbert wrote:
> The PROXY protocol spec specifically indicates that a receiver should not
> try to guess whether or not a PROXY protocol header is present[1]:
>
> > The
Hi Pierre,
> Apart from that, we exchanged off-list with Willy about the submitted patch.
> It seems that if fixes the issue. I now have only one instance bound to the
> TCP sockets after the reloads, the others are there just to terminate the
> existing connections.
And thank you for the quick
Hi,
I didn't subscribed to the list and noticed that there was several exchanges on
this thread that I didn't read so far.
To share a bit more of our context:
* we do not reload every 2ms, this was the setting used to be able to reproduce
easily and in a short period of time. Our reload
The consistent hash lookup is done as normal, then if balancing is
enabled, we progress through the hash ring until we find a server that
doesn't have "too much" load. In the case of equal weights for all
servers, the allowed number of requests for a server is either the
floor or the ceil of
For active servers, this is the sum of the eweights of all active
servers before this one in the backend, and
[srv->cumulative_weight .. srv_cumulative_weight + srv_eweight) is a
space occupied by this server in the range [0 .. lbprm.tot_wact), and
likewise for backup servers with tot_wbck. This
0 will mean no balancing occurs; otherwise it represents the ratio
between the highest-loaded server and the average load, times 100 (i.e.
a value of 150 means a 1.5x ratio), assuming equal weights.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Rodland
---
doc/configuration.txt| 28
Hi,
Here's a resend of my previous patch, incorporating some changes suggested by
Willy. As my mailer ate my patches last time around, and I'm not completely
sure that it won't do it again, I'm attaching them to this email as well as
sending them inline in the following emails.
Thanks,
This will allow lb_chash to determine the total active sessions for a
proxy without any computation.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Rodland
---
include/types/proxy.h | 1 +
src/queue.c | 1 +
src/stream.c | 2 ++
3 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git
Hi Andrew,
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 12:47:17PM -0400, Andrew Rodland wrote:
> Here's a resend of my previous patch, incorporating some changes suggested by
> Willy. As my mailer ate my patches last time around, and I'm not completely
> sure that it won't do it again, I'm attaching them to this
28 matches
Mail list logo