Hi,
HAProxy 2.5.6 was released on 2022/04/26. It added 86 new commits
after version 2.5.5.
As usual, several bugs were fixed in this release:
* An internal issue leading to truncated messages. When data were mixed
with an error report, connection errors could be handled too early by the
Hello,
> > Let's say we have the following setup.
> >
> > ```
> > maxconn 2
> > nbthread 4
> > ```
> >
> > My understanding is that HAProxy will accept 2 concurrent connection,
> > right? Even when I increase the nbthread will HAProxy *NOT* accept more then
> > 2 concurrent
Hi,
On Tue, 26 Apr 2022 03:32:16 -0700
Ivana Paul wrote:
> Hello haproxy.org
[SPAM Content]
New Idea for spam "learning platform" :-)
I never heard anything about "SMO services" and now I know it's this.
Social Media Optimization (SMO) Services
Regard
Alex
Hi, I have several backend configuration that make use of a custom script:
external-check command 'custom-script.sh'
The script read uses the environment variables such as $HAPROXY_PROXY_NAME.
I would like to be able to set and environment variable in the backend
declaration, before running the
Hello haproxy.org
Hope you know how engaging Social Media Platforms like Facebook, Instagram,
Twitter, etc. are these days.
We help you find the right audience and provide exposure for your services
while managing a consistent plan of communication for your business. You
reach the right people
On Tue, 26 Apr 2022 15:03:51 +0200
Valerio Pachera wrote:
> Hi, I have several backend configuration that make use of a custom script:
>
> external-check command 'custom-script.sh'
>
> The script read uses the environment variables such as $HAPROXY_PROXY_NAME.
> I would like to be able to set
Hi.
Anyone any Idea about the question below?
Regards
Alex
On Sat, 23 Apr 2022 11:05:36 +0200
Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I'm not sure if I understand the doc properly.
>
> https://docs.haproxy.org/2.2/configuration.html#nbthread
> ```
> This setting is only available when support for
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 11:28:47PM +0200, Tim Duesterhus wrote:
> A config like the following:
>
> global
> stats socket /run/haproxy/admin.sock mode 660 level admin expose-fd
> listeners
>
> resolvers unbound
> nameserver unbound 127.0.0.1:53
>
> will report the following
A config like the following:
global
stats socket /run/haproxy/admin.sock mode 660 level admin expose-fd
listeners
resolvers unbound
nameserver unbound 127.0.0.1:53
will report the following leak when running a configuration check:
==241882== 6,991 (6,952 direct, 39
Hi Tim,
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 11:35:07PM +0200, Tim Duesterhus wrote:
> To make the deinit function a proper inverse of the init function we need to
> free the `http_err_chunks`:
>
> ==252081== 311,296 bytes in 19 blocks are still reachable in loss record
> 50 of 50
> ==252081==at
To make the deinit function a proper inverse of the init function we need to
free the `http_err_chunks`:
==252081== 311,296 bytes in 19 blocks are still reachable in loss record 50
of 50
==252081==at 0x483B7F3: malloc (in
It appears that it is safe to call perform a clean deinit at this point, so
let's do this to exercise the deinit paths some more.
Running `valgrind --leak-check=full --show-leak-kinds=all ./haproxy -vv` with
this change reports:
==261864== HEAP SUMMARY:
==261864== in use at exit: 344
On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 12:08:11AM +0200, Tim Duesterhus wrote:
> It appears that it is safe to call perform a clean deinit at this point, so
> let's do this to exercise the deinit paths some more.
OK let's try. If there were any issue with this, we could easily revert
it without impact anyway.
13 matches
Mail list logo
