For those interested, here's a little experiment I did over the week-end :
http://haproxy.1wt.eu/hap-in-the-sky.html
Not too hard to reproduce, have fun!
Willy
Hi,
very cool ! thanks for sharing it :)
Regards,
Shadow.
2013/4/1 Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu
For those interested, here's a little experiment I did over the week-end :
http://haproxy.1wt.eu/hap-in-the-sky.html
Not too hard to reproduce, have fun!
Willy
Yeah, brilliant, it passed over versailles, 1h after leaving your flat :)
Fun to see how far it's going to go!
Baptiste
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 2:12 PM, david rene comba lareu
shadow.of.sou...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
very cool ! thanks for sharing it :)
Regards,
Shadow.
2013/4/1 Willy
Hi Simon,
Sorry for the long delay and thanks for waiting. I've just reviewed your
two patch series (16 total). They're pretty good in my opinion.
I'm seeing a few points we'll probably have to adjust :
- normally, health checks reserve file descriptors (one per checked server),
here we'll
Hi Marc-Antoine,
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 02:50:56PM +0100, Marc-Antoine Perennou wrote:
Formerly, if A was replaced by B, and then B by C before
A finished exiting, we didn't wait for B to finish so it
ended up as a zombie process.
Fix this by queuing all process we spawn for waitpid.
I'm a
Hi,
After checking out the man page of waitpid, wait would indeed be sufficient
here.
I didn't actually know about waitpid(-1)
I'll resubmit an updated patch tomorrow!
Thanks
On 1 April 2013 23:32, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote:
Hi Marc-Antoine,
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 02:50:56PM
Hi Alex,
On Sat, Mar 02, 2013 at 04:04:50PM +, Alex Davies wrote:
This change makes the crt block of the documentation easier to use
for those not clear on what needs to go in what file, specifically for
those using CAs that require intermediate certificates.
Applied, thank you for taking
On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 11:38:00PM +0200, Marc-Antoine Perennou wrote:
Hi,
After checking out the man page of waitpid, wait would indeed be sufficient
here.
I didn't actually know about waitpid(-1)
I'll resubmit an updated patch tomorrow!
Great. I'm planning a dev18 release for tomorrow
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 03:26:59AM +0900, Hiroaki Nakamura wrote:
Hi,
Thank you for your review.
Sorry for being late, now I made a new patch.
As you suggested, I added struct jit_regex. I also add typedef to
avoid #ifdef's scatter here and there. I think the code becomes cleaner.
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote:
Hi,
For the medium term, I'm going to prepare the following changes :
- make poll() rely solely on bit fields without using FD_* macros
- add a start up warning when select() is used with a maxconn leading
to more
10 matches
Mail list logo