Hi Baptiste,
Well in keep-alive mode I'd expect the connection to not be closed but
idle. I'm using HAProxy behind an ELB with keep-alive mode enabled, but
when using 'errorfile' I'm getting 504 Gateway Timeout.
The ELB manual:
"Solution: Enable keep-alive settings on your EC2 instances and set
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 11:23 PM, Mathias Bogaert
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible that HAProxy (1.5.8) closes a keep-alive connecting using
> 'http-request deny' in combination with 'errorfile'?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mathias
Hi Mathias,
I would say this is the expected behavior.
Have you observed som
Hi,
Is it possible that HAProxy (1.5.8) closes a keep-alive connecting using
'http-request deny' in combination with 'errorfile'?
Thanks,
Mathias
Subscribe joel.vanvelden+hapr...@bulletin.net
--
[image: Inline image 1]
Joel van Velden
DEVOPS ENGINEER
Bulletin.Net (NZ) Ltd.
Auckland, New Zealand
Dear Willy & list,
We've finally had some time to spend on the namespace support previously
discussed here on the mailing list.
Please find attached the new version of the patch implementing namespace
support and hopefully fixing some of your concerns. Changes compared to the
previous version of
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 3:48 PM, Jesse Hathaway wrote:
> Baptiste writes:
>
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 10:11 PM, Jesse Hathaway wrote:
>> > Does haproxy have support for fair share concurrent request scheduling?
>> >
>> > Description:
>> >
>> > Give each user at least their fair share of conc
Let me answer inline.
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Yosef Amir wrote:
> Will HAProxy keep 10.0.0.1 session (since the session time out 7 minutes-
> not expired) for the second request from the HTTP client ?
an incoming connection won't trigger a name resolution.
the name resolution is simply
Baptiste writes:
>
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 10:11 PM, Jesse Hathaway wrote:
> > Does haproxy have support for fair share concurrent request scheduling?
> >
> > Description:
> >
> > Give each user at least their fair share of concurrent connections based
on the
> > current number of users and
You are right, that's the way our DNS works.
I probably wasn't clear enough. I will describe a scenario.
Let's say we have HTTP client which opened session to HAProxy and HAProxy bind
to 10.0.0.1 backend server (HAProxy will get 10.0.0.1 from the DNS upon health
check and not upon client reques
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Yosef Amir wrote:
> Lets say that the DNS is configure with s1.domain.com which has 5 ips:
> 10.0.0.1
> 10.0.0.2
> 10.0.0.3
> 10.0.0.4
> 10.0.0.5
>
> The DNS respond for the first DNS query 10.0.0.1 for the second 10.0.0.2 and
> so on...(roundrobin)
> That's mean
Lets say that the DNS is configure with s1.domain.com which has 5 ips:
10.0.0.1
10.0.0.2
10.0.0.3
10.0.0.4
10.0.0.5
The DNS respond for the first DNS query 10.0.0.1 for the second 10.0.0.2 and so
on...(roundrobin)
That’s mean the for each health check (DNS query) HAProxy will get different ip.
Pr
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Yosef Amir wrote:
> We have in our system DNS which has its own logic for health check and
> balancing for preconfigured "farms".
> So, our system DNS could respond with different ip to the different queries
> for the same name i.g "s1.domain.com".
> Could it wi
We have in our system DNS which has its own logic for health check and
balancing for preconfigured "farms".
So, our system DNS could respond with different ip to the different queries for
the same name i.g "s1.domain.com".
Could it will be problem for the HAProxy ?
Thanks
Amir Yosef
-Orig
Thanks a lot for your clear answer.
Thanks
Amir Yosef
-Original Message-
From: Baptiste [mailto:bed...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2014 10:44 AM
To: Yosef Amir
Cc: Cohen Galit; HAProxy; Meltser Tiran
Subject: Re: HAProxy - DNS
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 8:50 PM, Yosef Amir wrot
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 8:50 PM, Yosef Amir wrote:
> Thanks a lot for the quick prompt.
>
> Will be very appreciate if you can elaborate (High Level is fine) for this
> feature option/s ?
DNS resolution will be per server.
So if your DNS server answers multiple IPs, then HAProxy will use only on
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 10:11 PM, Jesse Hathaway wrote:
> Does haproxy have support for fair share concurrent request scheduling?
>
> Description:
>
> Give each user at least their fair share of concurrent connections based on
> the
> current number of users and if capacity exceeds that allotment
17 matches
Mail list logo
