In Http/2 mode with threads enabled, updating the config on a live serving
haproxy server takes several minutes.
If I turn this off, the update of config is near instantaneous.
The config change itself is just adding a newline in the file. So it feels
like haproxy is waiting for connections to cl
Last macOS hasn't support export-dynamic, just remove it
---
Makefile | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index 2acf5028..19234897 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -630,7 +630,7 @@ check_lua_inc = $(shell if [ -d $(2)$(1) ]; then echo
$(2
On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 10:21:25PM +0100, Lukas Tribus wrote:
> Hello Pieter,
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 1:08 AM, PiBa-NL wrote:
> > Hi Lucas, William,
> >
> > I've made a patch which 'i think' fixes the issue with fclose called 'to
> > often?'.
> > Can you guys verify?
>
> I can confirm the
My small site is basically a html page with two pages (home and about for
example), each page contains basic markup, some styling and some JavaScript,
switching pages tends to replicate the issue every now and then (differs a bit
how often it happens, but possibly every 20-30 request or so)
I’m
Hello Lucas,
On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 9:24 PM, Lucas Rolff wrote:
> Can't even compose an email correctly..
>
> So:
>
> I experience the same issue however with nginx as a backend.
>
> I tried enabling “option httplog” within my frontend, it's rather easy for
> me to replicate, it affects a few
Hello Pieter,
On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 1:08 AM, PiBa-NL wrote:
> Hi Lucas, William,
>
> I've made a patch which 'i think' fixes the issue with fclose called 'to
> often?'.
> Can you guys verify?
I can confirm the patch fixes the issue reported; whether it does it
"the correct way" - I don't know
Can't even compose an email correctly..
So:
I experience the same issue however with nginx as a backend.
I tried enabling “option httplog” within my frontend, it's rather easy for me
to replicate, it affects a few percent of the traffic.
I have a site, with a total of 3 requests being perform
I tried enabling “option httplog” within my frontend, I do have the same issue
wit
On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 07:30:29PM +, Lucas Rolff wrote:
> > Could you please just remove this option (or replace it with
> > http-server-close if you absolutely want to disable keepalive for any
> > reason) ?
>
> I can't remember why I disabled keep-alive, however - removing it completely
>
> Could you please just remove this option (or replace it with
> http-server-close if you absolutely want to disable keepalive for any reason)
> ?
I can’t remember why I disabled keep-alive, however – removing it completely
did the trick.
So basically “option httpclose” and h2 won’t work.
Usin
On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 06:52:21PM +, Lucas Rolff wrote:
> - you said that using multiple certs breaks, but did you get a working state
> in any way ?
>
> Actually regarding the multiple certs breaking - I was wrong.
>
> So, if I use release 1.8.1 (downloaded from haproxy.org and compiling f
Sure either way I m ok with the changes decided. Thanks !
On 27 December 2017 at 18:40, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Thank you. I'll check with Christopher once he's back but I think that
> should be OK this way. I may have a suggestion (we'll edit before merging,
> don't worry) :
>
> On Wed, Dec 27,
- you said that using multiple certs breaks, but did you get a working state in
any way ?
Actually regarding the multiple certs breaking – I was wrong.
So, if I use release 1.8.1 (downloaded from haproxy.org and compiling from
source) then my bind works perfectly.
If I use release 1.8.2 with s
On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 06:06:33PM +, Lucas Rolff wrote:
> Hi Willy,
>
> I ended up adding an actual backend to perform the test (reused my nginx
> instance I had already), so the connection between haproxy and nginx would be
> a matter of localhost traffic - and I was indeed able to reach abo
Thank you. I'll check with Christopher once he's back but I think that
should be OK this way. I may have a suggestion (we'll edit before merging,
don't worry) :
On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 06:26:56PM +, David CARLIER wrote:
> From 2e76de286db0e4672a9173e52a070e4b61452983 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>
I must confess I love this one. I hope he didn't expect his inquiry to
remain discrete by sending it to the list and being archived forever :-)
Feeding the anti-spam with it now.
Willy
On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 06:41:49PM +0800, Daniel Millers wrote:
> Hi team at Haproxy
>
> How are you?
>
> I c
On 27 December 2017 at 18:18, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 01:23:34PM +, David CARLIER wrote:
> > diff --git a/contrib/spoa_example/Makefile b/contrib/spoa_example/
> Makefile
> > index c44c2b879..71ba6107a 100644
> > --- a/contrib/spoa_example/Makefile
> > +++
Hi Lucas,
On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 04:49:31PM +, Lucas Rolff wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I was running haproxy 1.8.1 and testing out http2, for this I require the
> alpn h2,http/1.1 in my bind - however when using multiple certificates
> together with alpn in 1.8.2 - this seems to break.
>
> My b
2017-12-27 19:16 GMT+01:00 Lucas Rolff :
> 1.8.2 is the latest version, or do you mean latest version as in compiling
> master from git?
>
Both are OK to test with.
>
>
> Current build config (my 1.8.1 build config is exactly the same, except
> version number is different):
>
>
>
> HA-Proxy ver
Hi David,
On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 01:23:34PM +, David CARLIER wrote:
> diff --git a/contrib/spoa_example/Makefile b/contrib/spoa_example/Makefile
> index c44c2b879..71ba6107a 100644
> --- a/contrib/spoa_example/Makefile
> +++ b/contrib/spoa_example/Makefile
> @@ -2,12 +2,14 @@ DESTDIR =
> PRE
1.8.2 is the latest version, or do you mean latest version as in compiling
master from git?
Current build config (my 1.8.1 build config is exactly the same, except version
number is different):
HA-Proxy version 1.8.2-08396fa 2017/12/23
Copyright 2000-2017 Willy Tarreau mailto:wi...@haproxy.org>
Hi Lucas,
There has been so many bugs fixed in HAProxy 1.8.2 you should really check
this latest version first, and see if you still have this issue.
Olivier
2017-12-27 17:49 GMT+01:00 Lucas Rolff :
> Hi guys,
>
>
>
> I was running haproxy 1.8.1 and testing out http2, for this I require the
Hi Willy,
I ended up adding an actual backend to perform the test (reused my nginx
instance I had already), so the connection between haproxy and nginx would be a
matter of localhost traffic – and I was indeed able to reach about 18k req/s on
a single core with keep-alive.
I can see that reply
Hi Davor!
On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 10:18:34PM +0100, Davor Ocelic wrote:
> From e2dcd863484826a6c38509d78845cb1a88b9f5ab Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Davor Ocelic
> Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2017 17:49:28 +0100
Got bored eating chocolates under the xmas tree and wante
On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 10:28:57AM +0100, Jérôme Magnin wrote:
> 748 looks like what a single core on a VM can achieve in terms of private key
> computation with rsa 2048 certs. You can confirm this by running the following
> command in your vm:
>
> openssl speed rsa2048.
>
> 21000 is too high to
Hi guys,
I was running haproxy 1.8.1 and testing out http2, for this I require the alpn
h2,http/1.1 in my bind – however when using multiple certificates together with
alpn in 1.8.2 – this seems to break.
My bind looks like this:
bind *:443 ssl crt /etc/haproxy/certs/default.pem crt /etc/hapro
Hi,
Here a little patch proposal to build the example.
Kind regards.
Thanks in advance.
From e9be79654d9b1f7b63e3f13b9f61b5ad4543cdf3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Carlier
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2017 13:19:14 +
Subject: [PATCH] BUILD/SMALL: contrib : spoa example
Change to the build to b
Hi team at Haproxy
How are you?
I came across your excellent site: http://haproxy.org
How much would it be for an article placement with a link in the main
content area of the article going to a *leading gaming/sports betting
site*, taking
into account the 3 points below:
- We will get the*
28 matches
Mail list logo