On 12/12/18 2:08 AM, PiBa-NL wrote:
Hi List,
Didn't have time yet to bisect when it went wrong. But attached testfile
produces the following output after 3 curl requests at different speeds,
this seems to trigger a problem as the hash of the downloaded content is
nolonger the same as it shoul
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 18, UPPALAPATI, PRAVEEN wrote:
> My backend config is:
>
> backend bk_8093_read
> balancesource
> http-response set-header X-Server %s
> option log-health-checks
> option httpchk get
> /nexus/v1/repository/rawcentral/com.att.swm.attpublic/healthcheck.txt
> HT
Hello,
Le 17/12/2018 à 20:16, Willy Tarreau a écrit :
Hi Arnall,
On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 02:13:31PM +0100, Arnall wrote:
don't know if it's related but haproxy.org answers with 400 status right now
!
(Windows 10 Chrome/Firefox)
Might be, though I can't reproduce it. I've found a capture of a
On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 11:43:44AM +0100, Christopher Faulet wrote:
> Le 18/12/2018 à 00:32, PiBa-NL a écrit :
> > Hi List, Christopher,
> >
> > Seems like d94f877 causes timeout in a pretty 'basic' connection test
> > that transfers a little bit of data .?
> > Or at least attached test fails to c
On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 at 14:56, UPPALAPATI, PRAVEEN wrote:
>
> wcentral/com.att.swm.attpublic/healthcheck.txt HTTP/1.1\r\nAuthorization:\
> Basic\
>
> [Dec 18 05:22:51] Health check for server bk_8093_read/primary8093r
> failed, reason: Layer7 wrong status, code: 400, info: "No Host", check
> dur
Hi Jarno,
My backend config is:
backend bk_8093_read
balancesource
http-response set-header X-Server %s
option log-health-checks
option httpchk get
/nexus/v1/repository/rawcentral/com.att.swm.attpublic/healthcheck.txt
HTTP/1.1\r\nAuthorization:\ Basic\
server primary8
Thankyou Willy. http-send-name-header works for my use case.
@Norman - Yes, we are looking at replacing the usage of X- headers.
Thanks
Sachin
On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 2:18 AM Norman Branitsky <
norman.branit...@micropact.com> wrote:
> Don't forget the "X-" header prefix is deprecated:
> https:/
Le 18/12/2018 à 00:32, PiBa-NL a écrit :
Hi List, Christopher,
Seems like d94f877 causes timeout in a pretty 'basic' connection test
that transfers a little bit of data .?
Or at least attached test fails to complete for me..
# top TEST ./PB-TEST/basic_connection.vtc TIMED OUT (kill -9)
#
Hi Cyril,
On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 09:11:26AM +0100, Cyril Bonté wrote:
> There's a bug with cookies and HTX.
> When haproxy sends the headers to the backend server, it leaks 6 more bytes
> at the end of the cookie value, which is the length of the name "cookie".
>
> This is due to this part of co
From: Frédéric Lécaille
This script runs two tests. One with "httpchk" over SSL/TLS and another
one with "check-ssl" option. As varnishtest does not support SSL/TLS
we use two haproxy processes to run these tests. h2 haproxy process
be2 and be4 backends declare one server each wich are the fronte
Hi haproxy.org,
Hope you are doing fantastic.
I am Alex Sr. Web Analyzer having 9+ years of experience in Search Engine
Marketing, Social media Marketing, Content Marketing, Pay-per-click, Video
Marketing etc.
While analyzing your website, we tracked some pitfalls for which your
website doesn’t s
Hi haproxy.com,
Hope you are doing fantastic.
I am Alex Sr. Web Analyzer having 9+ years of experience in Search Engine
Marketing, Social media Marketing, Content Marketing, Pay-per-click, Video
Marketing etc.
While analyzing your website, we tracked some pitfalls for which your
website doesn’t s
Hi Willy,
Le 17/12/2018 à 14:13, Arnall a écrit :
Le 16/12/2018 à 23:05, Willy Tarreau a écrit :
I expected to release this week-end after running it on the haproxy.org
servers, but some annoying issues faced in production took some time to
get fixed and delayed the release.
Things have been q
13 matches
Mail list logo
