On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 12:10:02AM +0200, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> Willy,
>
> Am 26.07.20 um 22:34 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> > Just a small point, Jackie, as I noticed you fixed several bad constructs
> > of "he" instead of "it", it's worth noting that in some latin languages
> > (like French or
Willy,
Am 26.07.20 um 22:34 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> Just a small point, Jackie, as I noticed you fixed several bad constructs
> of "he" instead of "it", it's worth noting that in some latin languages
> (like French or Spanish), a number of common words are arbitrarily male
> or female. A car is
Thanks Jérôme,
CCing Baptiste for approval (in case we've missed anything, I'm clueless
about DNS).
Willy
On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 06:04:38PM +0200, Jerome Magnin wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 05:47:00PM +0200, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> > Jerome,
> >
> > Regarding the commit
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 07:54:17PM +0200, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> Jackie,
>
> Am 26.07.20 um 19:02 schrieb Jackie Tapia:
> > Thanks for the suggestion, Tim.
> >
> > That commit message sounds good to me.
> >
>
> Your patch looks good to me now. I've put Willy into Cc to perform the
> final
Jackie,
Am 26.07.20 um 19:02 schrieb Jackie Tapia:
> Thanks for the suggestion, Tim.
>
> That commit message sounds good to me.
>
Your patch looks good to me now. I've put Willy into Cc to perform the
final review and commit the patch.
Best regards
Tim Düsterhus
Thanks for the suggestion, Tim.
That commit message sounds good to me.
On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 11:49 AM Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> Jackie,
>
> Am 26.07.20 um 18:36 schrieb Jackie Tapia:
> > I've attached an updated patch.
> >
> Thank you, the Diff LGTM now (however I did not check whether you
Jackie,
Am 26.07.20 um 18:36 schrieb Jackie Tapia:
> I've attached an updated patch.
>
Thank you, the Diff LGTM now (however I did not check whether you missed
any gendered phrasing).
Unfortunately it appears that you missed by remark regarding the missing
commit message body.
Please make sure
I've attached an updated patch.
Thanks!
On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 10:58 AM Jackie Tapia
wrote:
> Thank you for the feedback! I'll make those changes.
>
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 2:14 AM Tim Düsterhus wrote:
>
>> Jackie,
>>
>> First: I'm a community contributor, so my review might not
Hi Tim,
On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 05:47:00PM +0200, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> Jerome,
>
> Regarding the commit message: Please add backporting information to the
> end of the commit message body (I believe it should be 2.2+).
You're right the commit I mentionned in the message was indeed
introduced
Thank you for the feedback! I'll make those changes.
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 2:14 AM Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> Jackie,
>
> First: I'm a community contributor, so my review might not necessarily
> reflect that of the HAProxy project. I'm also not a native English speaker.
>
> Regarding your patch I
Jerome,
Am 26.07.20 um 17:25 schrieb Jerome Magnin:
> Please find a proper fix attached. We already know if we have entries in
> the Authority section (dns_p->header.nscount > 0), so just skip them
> when they are present and only use the Additional records.
Regarding the commit message: Please
On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 01:21:45PM +0200, Jerome Magnin wrote:
> as I was trying to reproduce the issue with DNS Service Discovery with
> SRV records reported in issue #775 I encountered a different issue.
>
> I am using bind as a dns server, and its answers contain an Authority
> field before
Hi,
as I was trying to reproduce the issue with DNS Service Discovery with
SRV records reported in issue #775 I encountered a different issue.
I am using bind as a dns server, and its answers contain an Authority
field before the Additional records that can be made use of since
13a9232eb
Hello,
cleanup patch attached.
Ilya Shipitcin
From e5a49969d374e3e8e9da695dca48cb6fa82ca13d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ilya Shipitsin
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2020 15:01:10 +0500
Subject: [PATCH] CLEANUP: suppress coverity warnings
Coverity is not happy when return value is not examined. Those
Hi.
Have you seen this Draft?
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-quic-load-balancers/
Because there are a lot of QUIC Drafts there and 2.2 is released it would be
nice
to get some update about the QUIC state in HAProxy ;-).
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/search/?name=QUIC=on=on
15 matches
Mail list logo
