[PATCH] BUILD: makefile: Enable getaddrinfo() on OS/X
Enable getaddrinfo() on OS/X. diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile index db9bbe7e9..2fb05c719 100644 --- a/Makefile +++ b/Makefile @@ -382,7 +382,8 @@ endif # Mac OS/X ifeq ($(TARGET),osx) set_target_defaults = $(call default_opts, \ -USE_POLL USE_TPROXY USE_LIBCRYPT USE_THREAD USE_CPU_AFFINITY USE_KQUEUE) +USE_POLL USE_TPROXY USE_LIBCRYPT USE_THREAD USE_CPU_AFFINITY USE_KQUEUE \ +USE_GETADDRINFO) EXPORT_SYMBOL = -export_dynamic endif
Advertising offer
Hey there, Hope this finds you well. I was just wondering if you had a chance of reviewing my latest message. Concerning advertising your website. Looking forward to your answer, thanks once again, and have a great day. Yours faithfully -- Maria Biz
Re: QUIC and the PROXY protocol
On Friday, October 9, 2020 4:28 PM, Frederic Lecaille wrote: > > > The IETF-QUIC transport protocol spec [1] hasn't been ratified, but > > > there exists a number of QUIC deployments in the wild. I'm writing a > > > proxy and I'd like to add support for QUIC. Are there any plans to add > > > QUIC4/QUIC6 to the list of PROXY transport protocols? > > > > from what I know the ongoing work on haproxy side is visible here > > https://github.com/haproxytech/quic-dev > > I let haproxy team answer if they have more details but there are > > already some preparation work done in haproxy.git mainline. > > Best, > > As already mentioned by William, I confirmed we have started to work on > QUIC support for HAProxy. > > Note that the last QUIC draft version is 31. Thanks both for replying. My question was less about haproxy and more about the PROXY protocol specification [1]. How should proxies forward QUIC connection metadata via the PROXY protocol? There is \x11 for TCP over IPv4, but nothing for QUIC over IPv4. [1]: https://www.haproxy.org/download/2.3/doc/proxy-protocol.txt
Re: QUIC and the PROXY protocol
On 10/9/20 3:54 PM, William Dauchy wrote: Hi Simon, Hi Simon, On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 3:10 PM Simon Ser wrote: The IETF-QUIC transport protocol spec [1] hasn't been ratified, but there exists a number of QUIC deployments in the wild. I'm writing a proxy and I'd like to add support for QUIC. Are there any plans to add QUIC4/QUIC6 to the list of PROXY transport protocols? from what I know the ongoing work on haproxy side is visible here https://github.com/haproxytech/quic-dev I let haproxy team answer if they have more details but there are already some preparation work done in haproxy.git mainline. Best, As already mentioned by William, I confirmed we have started to work on QUIC support for HAProxy. Note that the last QUIC draft version is 31. Regards, Fred.
Re: QUIC and the PROXY protocol
Hi Simon, On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 3:10 PM Simon Ser wrote: > The IETF-QUIC transport protocol spec [1] hasn't been ratified, but > there exists a number of QUIC deployments in the wild. I'm writing a > proxy and I'd like to add support for QUIC. Are there any plans to add > QUIC4/QUIC6 to the list of PROXY transport protocols? from what I know the ongoing work on haproxy side is visible here https://github.com/haproxytech/quic-dev I let haproxy team answer if they have more details but there are already some preparation work done in haproxy.git mainline. Best, -- William
QUIC and the PROXY protocol
Hi all, The IETF-QUIC transport protocol spec [1] hasn't been ratified, but there exists a number of QUIC deployments in the wild. I'm writing a proxy and I'd like to add support for QUIC. Are there any plans to add QUIC4/QUIC6 to the list of PROXY transport protocols? Thanks, Simon Ser [1]: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-quic-transport-30
Re: [PATCH] DOC: Add missing stats fields in the management doc
On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 9:59 AM Willy Tarreau wrote: > Good catch, thanks for these Pierre. I feel ashamed for having forgotten > to add them into the doc when I added the metrics :-/ I bet it was during our long running debug session before v2.2 :) -- William
Re: [PATCH] DOC: Add missing stats fields in the management doc
On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 04:37:14PM +0200, Pierre Cheynier wrote: > Added latest fields: idle_conn_cur, safe_conn_cur, used_conn_cur, > need_conn_est Good catch, thanks for these Pierre. I feel ashamed for having forgotten to add them into the doc when I added the metrics :-/ Willy
Re: [PATCH] help coverity to detect BUG_ON as a real stop
On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 03:09:06AM +0500, ??? wrote: > Hello,, > > I added DEBUG_STRICT=1 to coverity build definition. > hopefully, it will resolve 1 coverity issue. Applied, thanks Ilya! Willy
Re: [PATCH] BUILD: makefile: Update feature flags for NetBSD
On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 04:24:52PM -0400, Brad Smith wrote: > This updates the feature flags for NetBSD. > > NetBSD 8 adds support for accept4(). > > Enable getaddrinfo(). Applied, thanks Brad. willy
