hopefully final BoringSSL patches this week.
Ilya
From bebe09e8e1aaf89f12394322fa6a0387d4232f0a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ilya Shipitsin
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2020 23:10:04 +0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] CLEANUP: remove unused function "ssl_sock_is_ckch_valid"
"ssl_sock_is_ckch_valid" is not used a
On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 06:52:52PM +0100, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> Willy,
>
> Am 21.11.20 um 18:49 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> > On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 06:46:46PM +0100, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> >>> 2) make DEBUG_STRICT=1 default and only option
> >>
> >> This is what I did. Anything crashing by using D
сб, 21 нояб. 2020 г. в 22:55, Tim Düsterhus :
> Ilya,
>
> Am 21.11.20 um 18:51 schrieb Илья Шипицин:
> >>> there's single job configuration without strict debug
> >>> https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/blob/master/.travis.yml#L66
> >>>
> >>> I think there are couple of options available
> >>>
> >>
Ilya,
Am 21.11.20 um 18:51 schrieb Илья Шипицин:
>>> there's single job configuration without strict debug
>>> https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/blob/master/.travis.yml#L66
>>>
>>> I think there are couple of options available
>>>
>>> 1) add similar job definition to github actions
>>>
>>> 2) mak
Willy,
Am 21.11.20 um 18:49 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 06:46:46PM +0100, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
>>> 2) make DEBUG_STRICT=1 default and only option
>>
>> This is what I did. Anything crashing by using DEBUG_STRICT is a bug by
>> definition (compared to ASAN which might or might
сб, 21 нояб. 2020 г. в 22:46, Tim Düsterhus :
> Ilya,
>
> Am 21.11.20 um 18:38 schrieb Илья Шипицин:
> > there's single job configuration without strict debug
> > https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/blob/master/.travis.yml#L66
> >
> > I think there are couple of options available
> >
> > 1) add sim
On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 06:46:46PM +0100, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> > 2) make DEBUG_STRICT=1 default and only option
>
> This is what I did. Anything crashing by using DEBUG_STRICT is a bug by
> definition (compared to ASAN which might or might not be a bug). It's
> either a real bug or an incorrect
Ilya,
Am 21.11.20 um 18:38 schrieb Илья Шипицин:
> there's single job configuration without strict debug
> https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/blob/master/.travis.yml#L66
>
> I think there are couple of options available
>
> 1) add similar job definition to github actions
>
> 2) make DEBUG_STRIC
there's single job configuration without strict debug
https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/blob/master/.travis.yml#L66
I think there are couple of options available
1) add similar job definition to github actions
2) make DEBUG_STRICT=1 default and only option
also, we run ERR=1 for a while for v
On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 06:07:58PM +0100, Tim Duesterhus wrote:
> This forces a recompilation if the value of DEBUG= changes.
I thought it was the case, thanks for catching this! All 3 patches
merged now.
Willy
This was missing when migrating from Travis.
---
.github/workflows/compliance.yml | 1 +
.github/workflows/vtest.yml | 1 +
.github/workflows/windows.yml| 1 +
3 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/.github/workflows/compliance.yml b/.github/workflows/compliance.yml
index d778ee42
Previously this was not visible after building.
---
Makefile | 1 +
src/haproxy.c | 3 +++
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index ff2084dd1..dd85e51a2 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -919,6 +919,7 @@ src/haproxy.o: src/haproxy.c $(DEP)
This forces a recompilation if the value of DEBUG= changes.
---
Makefile | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index b93b0a872..ff2084dd1 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -878,7 +878,7 @@ help:
# Used only to force a rebuild if some build o
Hi,
HAProxy 2.4-dev1 was released on 2020/11/21. It added 107 new commits
after version 2.4-dev0.
Let me say that despite having spent quite some time recently on a few
really irritating bugs, I'm quite happy to see that the new development
cycle starts to pay off. It's probably the first ever ne
> Em 21 de nov de 2020, à(s) 12:00, William Lallemand
> escreveu:
>
> On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 07:48:48AM -0300, Joao Morais wrote:
>>
>> The attached patch adds some clarification on how one can declare a
>> proper fallback certificate using crt-list. Feel free to ask me to
>> tune verbosity
On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 07:48:48AM -0300, Joao Morais wrote:
>
> The attached patch adds some clarification on how one can declare a
> proper fallback certificate using crt-list. Feel free to ask me to
> tune verbosity to a higher or lower level.
>
That's actually a bit confusing, because the fi
On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 07:48:48AM -0300, Joao Morais wrote:
--
William Lallemand
0001-DOC-clarify-how-to-create-a-fallback-crt.patch
Description: Binary data
Hi Maciej,
On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 03:29:51PM +0100, Maciej Zdeb wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Willy thanks for clarification about lfs_file, I've removed it from patch.
> As Christopher mentioned, when developing the patch I've noticed the
> comment that when "action_ptr" is set, "action" can be set to any
>
sob., 21 lis 2020 o 07:13 Willy Tarreau napisał(a):
> So I guess we'll use you as a beta tester once we're starting to see
> promising solutions ;-)
>
I'll test it happily :)
Hi,
Willy thanks for clarification about lfs_file, I've removed it from patch.
As Christopher mentioned, when developing the patch I've noticed the
comment that when "action_ptr" is set, "action" can be set to any
meaningful value. However, I also had doubts about it. :)
Christopher I fixed the p
On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 07:48:48AM -0300, Joao Morais wrote:
>
> The attached patch adds some clarification on how one can declare a proper
> fallback certificate using crt-list. Feel free to ask me to tune verbosity to
> a higher or lower level.
Applied, thank you Joao!
Willy
I planned to have a look whether dedicated github action "install and cache
locally" exists for ubuntu
"apt-get update" and install itself add internet calls. we lose time on
that.
сб, 21 нояб. 2020 г. в 17:53, Tim Düsterhus :
> Ilya,
> Willy,
>
> Am 21.11.20 um 10:47 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> >
Ilya,
Willy,
Am 21.11.20 um 10:47 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> Hi Ilya,
>
> On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 02:05:01PM +0500, ??? wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> ubuntu somehow needs it, no idea why does not apt-get do it itself.
>
> Thanks, I took it, but please, please, the justification you provide
> abo
The attached patch adds some clarification on how one can declare a proper
fallback certificate using crt-list. Feel free to ask me to tune verbosity to a
higher or lower level.
0001-DOC-clarify-how-to-create-a-fallback-crt.patch
Description: Binary data
On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 02:53:05PM +0500, ??? wrote:
> here we go!
Merged, thank you!
Willy
On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 02:55:58PM +0500, ??? wrote:
> > Based on this, Ilya, do you have all the info you need and should I
> > take this or does this need more discussion ?
> >
>
> yes, I clarified it for myself
Perfect, now merged, thanks all!
Willy
сб, 21 нояб. 2020 г. в 14:48, Willy Tarreau :
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 12:38:02PM +0100, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> > > yes, I wonder how it is supposed to work.
> > > first, GH actions is supposed to run matrix.py in order to generate
> some
> > > scheduled jobs.
> >
> > It's simple, this part of th
here we go!
сб, 21 нояб. 2020 г. в 14:40, Willy Tarreau :
> On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 02:16:21PM +0500, ??? wrote:
> > ??, 21 . 2020 ?. ? 10:18, Willy Tarreau :
> >
> > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 02:10:33AM +0500, ??? wrote:
> > > > I'd like to get rid of OPENSSL_VERSION as muc
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 12:38:02PM +0100, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> > yes, I wonder how it is supposed to work.
> > first, GH actions is supposed to run matrix.py in order to generate some
> > scheduled jobs.
>
> It's simple, this part of the patch is responsible for that:
>
> -run: python3
Hi Ilya,
On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 02:05:01PM +0500, ??? wrote:
> Hello,
>
> ubuntu somehow needs it, no idea why does not apt-get do it itself.
Thanks, I took it, but please, please, the justification you provide
above is the essential part of your change and belongs to the commit
messag
On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 09:42:32AM +0100, Christopher Faulet wrote:
> ..Le 21/11/2020 à 06:15, Willy Tarreau a écrit :
> > I looked at the patch, it's OK regarding this and most of the other
> > stuff, except one thing, it mixes ACT_HTTP_* and PAT_MATCH_* and there
> > is some breakage there, becau
On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 02:16:21PM +0500, ??? wrote:
> ??, 21 . 2020 ?. ? 10:18, Willy Tarreau :
>
> > On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 02:10:33AM +0500, ??? wrote:
> > > I'd like to get rid of OPENSSL_VERSION as much as possible.
> > > what would be better for guarding TLS13 ciphers
сб, 21 нояб. 2020 г. в 10:18, Willy Tarreau :
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 02:10:33AM +0500, ??? wrote:
> > I'd like to get rid of OPENSSL_VERSION as much as possible.
> > what would be better for guarding TLS13 ciphers manipulation ?
> >
> > approach 1 (macro defined in openssl-compat.h)
>
Hello,
ubuntu somehow needs it, no idea why does not apt-get do it itself.
Ilya
From 0803e7bedff24f98cab5221999bf591bd4b8d23c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ilya Shipitsin
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2020 13:42:19 +0500
Subject: [PATCH] CI: Github Action: run "apt-get update" before packages
restore
---
..Le 21/11/2020 à 06:15, Willy Tarreau a écrit :
I looked at the patch, it's OK regarding this and most of the other
stuff, except one thing, it mixes ACT_HTTP_* and PAT_MATCH_* and there
is some breakage there, because the HTTP action being set to PAT_MATCH_STR
for example sets it to value 5 whi
35 matches
Mail list logo
