Re: regression? scheme and hostname logged with %r with 2.6.13

Hi, Yeah I addressed this with "%HM %HPO%HQ %HV" which looks right in my logs under some light testing, but I will check the pathq option also. B. > On 7 Jun 2023, at 22:39, Lukas Tribus wrote: > > Hello, > > > yes, H2 behaves very differently; due to protocol differences but also > due to

Re: regression? scheme and hostname logged with %r with 2.6.13

Hello, yes, H2 behaves very differently; due to protocol differences but also due to other changes. In the beginning H2 was only implemented in the frontend and every transaction was downgraded to HTTP/1.1 internally. This was later changed to an internal generic "HTX" representation that

re: regression? scheme and hostname logged with %r with 2.6.13

Hi, Figured this out (my reply might not be threaded, the mailing list daemon doesn't add me after I confirm my subscription) It was https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/commit/30ee1efe676e8264af16bab833c621d60a72a4d7 in haproxy 2.1 that caused this change. It's deliberate but the documentation

[ANNOUNCE] haproxy-2.7.9

Hi, HAProxy 2.7.9 was released on 2023/06/07. It added 118 new commits after version 2.7.8. This release, as the previous one, is a bit huge. We were busy to release the 2.8.0. It is high time for us to emit new releases for other stable versions. The 2.7.9 is the first one of a long series.

Re: [PATCH] DOC: quic: fix misspelled tune.quic.socket-owner

Hello Willy,  I understand, thank you for the explanation. Have a nice holidays ! ;) Le 07/06/2023 à 14:55, Willy Tarreau a écrit : Hello Artur, On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 03:18:31PM +0200, Artur wrote: About the backporting instructions I was not sure how far it should be backported. I

Re: maint, drain: the right approach

Hi Willy, > > Seems that it's considered an expected behavior to consider > > optimistically the server as UP > > when leaving MAINT mode, even if the L4 health checks are not completed > > yet. > Normally using the existing API you could forcefully > mark the server's check as down using

Re: Contribute to HaProxy

Hi Umesh, On Fri, Jun 02, 2023 at 10:27:48AM +0530, umesh patel wrote: > Hi There, > > I am looking for SCTP protocol based load balancer. I see that HaProxy has > a solid platform for TCP load balancing. However, SCTP is not supported. I > would like to develop and contribute to HaProxy SCTP

Re: [PATCH] DOC: quic: fix misspelled tune.quic.socket-owner

Hello Artur, On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 03:18:31PM +0200, Artur wrote: > About the backporting instructions I was not sure how far it should be > backported. I preferred to skip it instead of giving an erroneous > instruction. > Maybe someone can explain if this backport instruction is really