Re: Pregenerated SSL sessions interest?

On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 3:02 PM Aleksandar Lazic <al-hapr...@none.at> wrote: > Hi. > > Am 15.02.2018 um 22:42 schrieb Christopher Lane: > > Internally, my company uses pregenerated SSL sessions. > > Just for my curiosity what is a "pregenerated SSL

Pregenerated SSL sessions interest?

Internally, my company uses pregenerated SSL sessions. I am thinking about maybe changing haproxy to load and use our sessions. Would there be interest in some sort of opensource change to allow session loading as some easy extension/config for haproxy. Like some config

Re: [PATCH] CONTRIB: log: exit with warning when -sf/-sd cannot parse argument

On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 5:06 AM Willy Tarreau wrote: > Hi Chris, > > On Sat, Feb 03, 2018 at 10:08:58PM +, Chris Lane wrote: > > diff --git a/src/haproxy.c b/src/haproxy.c > > index f1a2fb9..30490b3 100644 > > --- a/src/haproxy.c > > +++ b/src/haproxy.c > > @@ -1445,13 +1445,26

Re: [PATCH] CONTRIB: log: emit warning when -sf/-sd cannot parse argument

On Jan 26, 2018 10:39 PM, "Willy Tarreau" <w...@1wt.eu> wrote: On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 11:14:03PM +0000, Christopher Lane wrote: > > I don't know much what to think about such a change to be honnest. What > > valid use case do you have for passing multiple processes as

Re: [PATCH] CONTRIB: log: emit warning when -sf/-sd cannot parse argument

On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 8:52 PM Willy Tarreau <w...@1wt.eu> wrote: > Hi Chris, > > On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 10:07:03PM +0000, Christopher Lane wrote: > > Ping; this is a safe change to wanr about a confusing source of error > when > > you don't quote the arguments t

Re: [PATCH] CONTRIB: log: emit warning when -sf/-sd cannot parse argument

Ping; this is a safe change to wanr about a confusing source of error when you don't quote the arguments to haproxy in a "soft reloading new config a lot" type of environment. On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 1:17 PM Chris Lane wrote: > > Previously, -sf and -sd command line

Re: Incredible performance bump between 1.5.12 and 1.8.1 ?

On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 10:18 PM, Willy Tarreau <w...@1wt.eu> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 09, 2017 at 10:10:25AM +0100, Pavlos Parissis wrote: >> On 09/12/2017 05:01 ?u, Christopher Lane wrote: >> > It is plausible/expected that my version upgrade performance goes like &g

Incredible performance bump between 1.5.12 and 1.8.1 ?

It is plausible/expected that my version upgrade performance goes like (about 4K connections, long lived and short lived mix, TCP only, no HTTP: 1.5.12 (nproc 1, old connections causing about 100 old -sf processes to linger) uses 100% CPU almost all the time, frequently with >1 process. (100%,

Re: Segfault with 1.8.0 build (RHEL5, old gcc).

On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 4:36 AM, Olivier Houchard <ohouch...@haproxy.com> wrote: > Hi Christopher, > > On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 05:34:15PM -0800, Christopher Lane wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 11:56 AM, Christopher Lane >> <ch...@disputingtaste.com> wrote: >&g

Re: Segfault with 1.8.0 build (RHEL5, old gcc).

On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 11:56 AM, Christopher Lane <ch...@disputingtaste.com> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 4:22 AM Lukas Tribus <lu...@ltri.eu> wrote: > >>Hello Christopher, > > >>2017-12-01 20:59 GMT+01:00 Christopher Lane <ch...@dispu

Re: Segfault with 1.8.0 build (RHEL5, old gcc).

On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 4:22 AM Lukas Tribus <lu...@ltri.eu> wrote: >Hello Christopher, >2017-12-01 20:59 GMT+01:00 Christopher Lane <ch...@disputingtaste.com>: >> >> gist with backtrace, -vv output, and config file. Also strace. >>

Segfault with 1.8.0 build (RHEL5, old gcc).

gist with backtrace, -vv output, and config file. Also strace. https://gist.github.com/jayalane/c6dbe7918aa9635b62c874d20f57dfec It does all the listens and then right after the first epoll is done it has this segv. all the local variables are "optimized out" (We really want the