On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 4:05 AM, Allen, Thomas tal...@asce.org wrote:
Hi,
I like the idea of having HAProxy check server health, but for some reason,
it reports all of my servers as down. Here's my full config:
listen http_proxy :80
mode http
balance roundrobin
option httpchk
Message-
From: Jeffrey 'jf' Lim [mailto:jfs.wo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 2:22 AM
To: Allen, Thomas
Cc: haproxy@formilux.org
Subject: Re: option httpchk is reporting servers as down when they're not
- Show quoted text -
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 4:05 AM, Allen, Thomas tal
Woohoo!! :) thanks, Willy, for the work. Seems like a really great
list of stuff there.
Especially love the HTTP invalid request and response captures per
frontend/backend feature - I would definitely love to be able to see
what we're getting over here where we use haproxy
One question if u
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 2:38 AM, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote:
Hi Thomas,
On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 08:45:20AM -0500, Allen, Thomas wrote:
Hi Jeff,
The thing is that if I don't include the health check, the load balancer
works fine and each server receives equal distribution. I have no
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 8:02 PM, Benoit maver...@maverick.eu.org wrote:
diff -ru haproxy-1.3.15.7/doc/configuration.txt
haproxy-1.3.15.7-cur/doc/configuration.txt
--- haproxy-1.3.15.7/doc/configuration.txt 2008-12-04 11:29:13.0
+0100
+++
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 3:48 AM, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote:
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 12:31:27PM -0700, John L. Singleton wrote:
I'm a little mystified as to the usefulness of this as well. I mean,
what does hashing the domain name solve that just balancing back to a
bunch of Apache
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 5:06 AM, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote:
Hi all!
Now that the storm of horror stories has gone with release of 1.3.17,
I'd like to explain what I'm planning to do for future versions of
haproxy.
Right now there are a few issues with the development process and
the
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 3:32 PM, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote:
Hi Ryan,
On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 12:22:57PM -0700, Ryan Schlesinger wrote:
I've got haproxy set up (with 2 frontends) to load balance a php app
which works great. However, we're using a java uploader applet that
doesn't
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 9:02 PM, Dirk Taggesell
dirk.tagges...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I want to load balance a new server application that generally sends
http code 204 - to save bandwidth and to avoid client-side caching.
In fact it only exchanges cookie data, thus no real content
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 7:51 PM, Andrew Commons
andrew.comm...@bigpond.com wrote:
Hi Beni,
A few things to digest here.
What was leading me up this path was a bit of elementary (and probably naïve)
white-listing with respect to the contents of the Host header and the URI/L
supplied by the
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote:
OK so here are a few results of haproxy 1.4.8 running on Atom D510 (64-bit)
without keep-alive :
6400 hits/s on 0-bytes objets
6200 hits/s on 1kB objects (86 Mbps)
5700 hits/s on 2kB objects (130 Mbps)
5250 hits/s on 4kB
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 7:29 AM, Bryan Talbot btal...@aeriagames.com wrote:
In the tcpdump listed below, isn't the next-to-the-last RST also include an
ACK of the data previously sent? If that is the case, then the client has
received all of the data and ACK'd it but then rudely closed the TCP
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 7:27 PM, Hank A. Paulson
h...@spamproof.nospammail.net wrote:
Please see the thread:
need help figuring out a sticking method
I asked about this, Willie says there are issues figuring out a workable
config syntax for 'regex to pull the URL/URI substring' but (I think)
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 2:05 AM, DeMarco, Alex alex.dema...@suny.eduwrote:
I have a situation where a backend server defined in HAProxy may be a
vip on our F5.The F5 vip is setup for source persistence. Right now
all the requests to this vip from the haproxy box are all going to one
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Jürgen Haas juer...@paragon-es.de wrote:
Hi there,
I'm having some issues with the forward-for feature. It seems to be
working in general but for some reason not consistently. My default
section in the config file looks like this:
defaults
log global
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Jürgen Haas juer...@paragon-es.de wrote:
Am 21.05.2014 08:40, schrieb Jeffrey 'jf' Lim:
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Jürgen Haas juer...@paragon-es.de wrote:
It's been some time since i last looked at the code; but I reckon it
would be the same issue I came
16 matches
Mail list logo
